I just confirmed, that it is not the apt proxy I am using. I will now try the
new automated installer instead of preseeding.
Apparently it has something to do with the preseeding I did. Actually
apt/apt-get/aptitude worked fine and have no problems to install packages. Just
the ansible-apt
I just did a fresh install of 20.04 from the live cd, and the playbook
works there as well. It must be something with my automated installation
method. Currently I am still using preseed and an apt proxy. I will
continue debugging the setup, as it still does not work in this
environment.
--
You
Thats great info. At least it generally is able to run.
The shebang is there to be able to call the playbook as ./apt.yml.
For testing I removed the first two lines (comments) and on my fresh focal
system it still fails:
PLAY [Install packages]
Yes,
I already reduced the playbook to the following:
#!/usr/bin/env ansible-playbook
#
---
- name: Install packages
hosts: localhost
tasks:
- name: install apt packages
apt:
pkg:
- git
become: true
It still fails.
--
You
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874195/+attachment/5358301/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected focal
** Description changed:
When using ansible on 20.04, package installation via apt fail.
Consider the following playbook:
#!/usr/bin/env ansible-playbook
#
---
- name: Install packages
hosts: localhost
tasks:
I just confirmed that on Ubuntu 18.04 the playbook works fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874195
Title:
ansible is not able to install packages via apt on 20.04
To manage
Public bug reported:
When using ansible on 20.04, package installation via apt fail.
Consider the following playbook:
#!/usr/bin/env ansible-playbook
#
---
- name: Install packages
hosts: localhost
tasks:
- name: install apt packages
apt:
pkg:
Running conntrackd with valgrind provides the attached log.
The Segfault is on line 36030.
** Attachment added: "valgrind.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/conntrack-tools/+bug/1852072/+attachment/5306286/+files/valgrind.log.bz2
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I have a setup using conntrackd and keepalived for a ha-firewall. When
stress-testing the system by stopping and starting keepalived eventually the
conntrackd segfaults.
Nov 4 15:29:46 host conntrackd[1122]: [Mon Nov 4 15:29:46 2019] (pid=1122)
[notice] committing
This is still the fact on LTS 16.04. A patch was posted on
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/2016-December/010307.html
It would be great if this would be added to the apparmor-utils.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 14.10
apparmor 2.8.98-0ubuntu2
Analyzing the logs with aa-logprof works when the logs are written by
audid:
# aa-logprof -f /var/log/audit/audit.log
Reading log entries from /var/log/audit/audit.log.
Updating AppArmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d.
Complain-mode
This happens on Trusty Tahr 14.04 as well:
german installation
apparmor-utils 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Strongswan is divided into several packages. You can install either
strongswan-ikev1 or strongswan-ikev2 alone or both at the same time.
Unfortunately the pluto daemon in strongswan-ikev1 depends on the
libstrongswan-kernel-netlink.so plugin which is only provided in
Thanks a lot. So you are saying there is no way to do an
ifdown bond0
ifup bon0
and the bond is recreated on Ubuntu?
Maybe this needs to be stated in the documentation as this is the
expected behavior.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
I am trying to preseed an Ubuntu LTS 12.04 installation without using LVM.
This works fine if a previous linux installation on the same system did not use
LVM.
If lvm volumes are already present on the system the preseeding partman fails
and no root filesystem selected is
Public bug reported:
Release: Ubuntu 12.04
ifenslave-2.61.1.0-19ubuntu5
At boot time bonding interfaces are activated fine. But if I manually
ifdown the bonding interface and subsequently ifup it againt the
physical network cards are not enslaved.
I use the following
The correct way is:
localechooser/translation/warn-severe=true
localechooser/translation/warn-light=true
Somehow counterintuitive ;-)
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I can confirm it on amd64 using
ipvsadm 1.25.clean-1ubuntu5
linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic and linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585
Further information:
ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.10.21:80 -s rr
works, while
ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.10.21:80 -s -rr
(obviously wrong syntax) creates a memory allocation error.
Apparently whenever a syntax or semantic error occurs ipvsadm generates
an memory allocation error.
So generate a virtual
I can confirm it on amd64 using
ipvsadm 1.25.clean-1ubuntu5
linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic and linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585
Title:
Memory
Further information:
ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.10.21:80 -s rr
works, while
ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.10.21:80 -s -rr
(obviously wrong syntax) creates a memory allocation error.
Apparently whenever a syntax or semantic error occurs ipvsadm generates
an memory allocation error.
So generate a virtual
Thanks a lot for your great work.
Is it possible to make the same move for Precise? Precise being LTS will be
much longer around than Quantal.
We would really appreciate it if netcf could be moved to main for 12.04.1 as it
was planned originally
Any thoughts?
--
You received this bug
Thanks a lot for your great work.
Is it possible to make the same move for Precise? Precise being LTS will be
much longer around than Quantal.
We would really appreciate it if netcf could be moved to main for 12.04.1 as it
was planned originally
Any thoughts?
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
I would like to preseed Ubuntu Precise.
The installer mentions that the translation is still incomplete. I would like
to suppress this message.
I have tried
pkgsel/ignore-incomplete-language-support=true
localechooser/translation/warn-severe=false
Hi Steve,
yes, this just concerns 10.04 but not 12.04. Sorry for not mentioning
this in the first place.
Ralf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974165
Title:
logprof/genprof skip
Hi Serge,
is there anything we can help from the outside? Unfortunately we do not
have access to the Ubuntu build system. We need netcf in libvirt for our
environment and would gladly offer some time to push this ahead.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is still the same, using 12.04:
# aa-logprof
Reading log entries from /var/log/audit/audit.log.
Updating AppArmor profiles in /etc/apparmor.d.
Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/share/perl5/Immunix/AppArmor.pm line
2818, $LOG line 2233.
Use of uninitialized value $profile in string
This is still unsolved for 12.04. Please reopen the bug.
The proposed fixes do not work. They modify the start scripts of the
specific daemons to load only their profiles. Any security oriented
admin creating his own profiles for additional services not yet
protected by ubuntu profiles is having
Public bug reported:
AppArmor is loaded to late in the boot process. Manually generated
profiles by security oriented admins are activated after the daemons are
started. The daemons run unconfined. This is a security vulnerability
because the admin apparently has no way of activating the profile.
Applies to Ubuntu 12.04 with apparmor 2.7.102-0ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974089
Title:
AppArmor is loaded far to late in the boot process to confine services
To manage
Public bug reported:
Applies to: Ubuntu 10.04 with
Linux station1 2.6.32-40-generic #87-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 6 00:56:56 UTC 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
# apt-cache policy apparmor
apparmor:
Installiert: 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.3
Kandidat: 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.3
Logprof/Genprof may be used to
Ok. I understand that. But I think this needs to be documented
prominently either in the wiki or the apparmor package. Without any
documentation the admin generating his own profiles does not know how to
handle the situation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This patch fixes it:
http://groups.google.com/group/ganeti/attach/95e8de340d1b4b70/fix-qemu-1.0-compat.patch?part=2
--- a/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py 2012-02-01 13:14:28.556767386 +
+++ b/lib/hypervisor/hv_kvm.py 2012-02-01 13:17:02.431087060 +
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
Public bug reported:
Ganeti uses PyCurl to connect to the master daemon. When PyCurl is linked
against GnuTLS the connection fails:
2012-03-26 07:00:13,862: gnt-cluster init pid=5995 INFO Using PycURL
libcurl/7.22.0 GnuTLS/2.12.14 zlib/1.2.3.4 libidn/1.23 librtmp/2.3
2012-03-26 07:00:18,658:
We are currently in the process of building a webbased gui for the management
of virtual machines via libvirt. It would be greate if netcf is included in
libvirt, because then the creation of vlans and bridges connected to these
vlans could be handled via libvirt.
Please link libvirt to netcf.
We are currently in the process of building a webbased gui for the management
of virtual machines via libvirt. It would be greate if netcf is included in
libvirt, because then the creation of vlans and bridges connected to these
vlans could be handled via libvirt.
Please link libvirt to netcf.
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Precise with all updates
gtk-vnc: libgtk-vnc-1.0-0 0.5.0-1ubuntu1
vinagre: 3.3.3-0ubuntu1
xtightvncviewer: 1.3.9-6.2
qemu-kvm: 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu2
Virtual guest with Windows 7 32bit
When using Qemu-kvm to virtualize guests the virt-viewer and vinagre (both
based
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Precise
Versions:
qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu2
xvnc4viewer 4.1.1+xorg4.3.0-37ubuntu3
Connecting to a virtual guest via the qemu built in vnc-server crashes
xvnc4viewer. The image is drawn and then the client crashes.
# xvnc4viewer 192.168.0.202:5900
VNC
What can I do to push this?
Ubuntu LTS is unusable on advanced platforms without numa.
Virtualization on LTS is unusable on advanced platforms without numa locking
via libvirtd
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Apparently this is a 2.6/3.0 Kernel thing. Using the command uname26
from http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/people/ak/uname26/ it works:
Without uname26:
# hpacucli ctrl all show
Error: No controllers detected.
With uname26:
# ./uname26 hpacucli ctrl all show
Smart Array P400 in Slot 9
Public bug reported:
When installing Precise Alpha 1 the debian-installer requires a gateway
when configuring static network.
When I use an empty string the Installer shows an error: gateway not
reachable.
I would like to install debian in a network without gateway.
** Affects: netcfg (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
I have built a USB-Stick to install Ubuntu Server Precise Alpha 1 64 Bit
based on the precise-alpha-1-amd64 ISO image.
Installation works but the netcfg component segfaults!
The installer screen shows an error. The 4th console shows:
INFO: Menu item 'netcfg' selected
INFO:
Removing all netcfg preseeding options circumvents the segfault.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901700
Title:
netcfg segfauts when preseeding Precise Alpha 1
To manage notifications
Turning on this option, make netcfg segfault:
d-i netcfg/enable boolean false
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901700
Title:
netcfg segfauts when preseeding Precise Alpha 1
To manage
This is very important, since the coming 12.04 will be a LTS version
again. Not being able to use NUMA in main will pose a lot of problems on
NUMA architectures.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599735/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
hpacucli is a HP commandline tool to configure hp smart array controllers
online.
A amd64 package using i386 libraries can be found here
http://downloads.linux.hp.com/SDR/psp/pool/non-free/
This binary works
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599736/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599737/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599738/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599740/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599741/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599742/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599744/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599743/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768/+attachment/2599739/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Tried 3.2.0-030200rc2-generic as suggested by Joseph. It does not change
anything.
Still no controllers found.
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging kernel-bug-exists-upstream
** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.1.0-2.3
--
You received this bug notification
** Tags added: kernel-needs- upstream-bug-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890768
Title:
hpacucli does not find controllers on precise
To manage notifications about this bug go
Public bug reported:
hpacucli is a HP commandline tool to configure hp smart array controllers
online.
A amd64 package using i386 libraries can be found here
http://downloads.linux.hp.com/SDR/psp/pool/non-free/
This binary works fine on 2.6 kernels but not on 3.1. Apparently the
tool
There is no crashdump to collect. The tools runs but does not find a
controller.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have discussed the matter with Guido Günther from the Debian team.
After some testing he reenabled the numa feature in the debian package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648323
Would you like to follow him?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #648323
I have discussed the matter with Guido Günther from the Debian team.
After some testing he reenabled the numa feature in the debian package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648323
Would you like to follow him?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #648323
I can confirm this and I am very dissapointed that still after more than a year
this issue has not been fixed.
I am currently running Ubuntu precise (development, the next lts) on
HP DL 585 G2 with 4 Dual Cores and thus 4 Numa cells.
Numactl shows the hardware:
# numactl --show
policy: default
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614322
Title:
libvirt not recognizing NUMA architecture
To manage
I can confirm this and I am very dissapointed that still after more than a year
this issue has not been fixed.
I am currently running Ubuntu precise (development, the next lts) on
HP DL 585 G2 with 4 Dual Cores and thus 4 Numa cells.
Numactl shows the hardware:
# numactl --show
policy: default
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614322
Title:
libvirt not recognizing NUMA architecture
To manage notifications
67 matches
Mail list logo
