I talked to Todd C. Miller, the author of sudo, who proposed the
following patch:
diff -r 6c0cc2def911 plugins/sudoers/ldap.c
--- a/plugins/sudoers/ldap.cWed Jun 04 11:43:39 2014 -0600
+++ b/plugins/sudoers/ldap.cMon Jun 16 13:41:02 2014 -0600
@@ -2429,10 +2429,11 @@
rc =
Public bug reported:
NOTE: I was asked in
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+question/249819 to
report this as a bug.
raub@testfirewall:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Release: 14.04
Codename: trusty
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.9.6-1~12.04.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
I did apt-get upgrade to the host in question and found out that
/etc/postfix/main.cf was silently changed (I was not asked to
validateverify changes)
(/var/log/apt/term.log)
Setting up mail-stack-delivery (1:2.0.19-0ubuntu2.1)
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.9.6-1~12.04.1 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
I did apt-get upgrade to the host in question and found out that
/etc/postfix/main.cf was silently changed (I was not asked to
validateverify changes)
(/var/log/apt/term.log)
Setting up mail-stack-delivery (1:2.0.19-0ubuntu2.1)
Public bug reported:
Related to
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+question/237854
When upgrading slapd, I observed the following:
root@ubuntu:~# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly
Public bug reported:
Related to
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+question/237854
When upgrading slapd, I observed the following:
root@ubuntu:~# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly
According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, and http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, the examples are in the dovecot-core package
According to http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, and http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/dovecot-
core/filelist, the examples are in the dovecot-core package
Public bug reported:
According to http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux-
complete/, 2.5.0 is not considered a current version. Would it be
possible to provide something newer?
** Affects: dahdi-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Attachment added:
Public bug reported:
I am installing Asterisk 1.8 + dahdi + wanpipe (which I will be
installing manually) in ubuntu 12.04LTS. So I begin by doing
apt-get install asterisk asterisk-dahdi asterisk-dev asterisk-mysql
mysql-server curl asterisk-mp3 unzip
apt-get install build-essential
I believe the main reason for this issue is because this is a fresh
install of 12.04LTS, i.e. uses backported kernels from 12.10/13.04;
uname -a
Linux voip 3.5.0-36-generic #57~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 20 18:21:09 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Which probably might explain why the
Another reason to upgrade is the asm/system.h issue, as mentioned in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dahdi-linux/+bug/1199081
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199040
Title:
Public bug reported:
Was trying to install openssh-server and then got a crash report
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: lrzsz 0.12.21-5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic 3.2.30
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14
AptOrdering:
Just to let anyone know, it still happens in 12.04:
Sep 20 14:29:21 ubuntu64 kernel: [84118.210121] nscd[17964]: segfault at
0 ip 7f6d44ef2b91 sp 7f6d3d9515e8 error 4 in
libc-2.15.so[7f6d44e6a000+1b3000]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
In 12.04, after I went to /etc/nscd.conf and changed
enable-cachenetgroupyes
to
enable-cachenetgroupno
and restarted nscd, I stopped seeing segfault messages in my syslog
file. Is this the solution? I honestly do not know, but it has
Public bug reported:
If nslcd and nscd are both installed on a machine, that means we are
doing ldap. Which means nslcd needs to first talk to ldap and then have
nscd do its thing by querying nslcd. Therefore, we really want
/etc/init.d/nscd to have something like:
# Should-Start: nslcd
#
** Description changed:
If nslcd and nscd are both installed on a machine, that means we are
doing ldap. Which means nslcd needs to first talk to ldap and then have
nscd do its thing by querying nslcd. Therefore, we really want
/etc/init.d/nscd to have something like:
- Should-Start:
I believe that
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1335022
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss-pam-ldapd/+bug/806761
are related since they show a better way to do this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
in you should see something like:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_0156Pt
6. Immediately reload page. You will now see
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=
7. Wait 15 seconds and try again
in you should see something like:
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_apache_0156Pt
6. Immediately reload page. You will now see
PHP Kerberos Test
user=raubvogel
REMOTE_USER=raubvo...@domain.com
KRB5CCNAME=
7. Wait 15 seconds and try again
Public bug reported:
Input file:
raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ cat pickles
Hey there!
Think of the metaphysical consequences!
Banana banana banana!
raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$
Now, run gpg --clearsign pickles, creating pickles.asc. And then see its
contents:
raub@ubuntu86:/tmp$ cat pickles.asc
-BEGIN PGP
I see your point. What initially confused me is that I received a pgp message
from launchpad (confirming registration of an
OpenPGP key for use in Launchpad) that looked like this:
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
So, the '-END PGP SIGNATURE-' suffices to end the message? I can
live with that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007094
Title:
gpg --clearsign does not create the -END
Public bug reported:
From reading the page carefully, it seems
server1: nagios server
server2: nagios client
I believe either renaming them, such as
server1 --- nagios-server
server2 --- nagios-client1 (so we can then say now, let's define a second
nagios client,
Ok, it seems a workaround is to first go to mysql (assuming this is the
db you are using), and grant all privileges to the rt database (rt3 in
this example) to the rt user (rtuser) but *without* creating the
database itself. Then run rt-setup-database-3.8
--
You received this bug notification
Update: This still happens with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and RT 3.8.7-1. I also
tried on 10.10 and RT 3.8.8-4. And 11.04 and RT 3.8.10.-1. Issue still
remains on all these combinations.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Lockfile part of this bug was addressed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/722770
Serge, is there a way for me to try that in 10.10 or 10.04LTS? I do not
have natty and need it in 10.04LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Serge,
NVM, I tested in 10.10 and they work. /etc/default/openipmi is created
and /etc/init.d/openipmi correctly points to /etc/default/openipmi and
/var/lock/ipmi.
So, looks like a winner to me.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
Lockfile part of this bug was addressed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/722770
Serge, is there a way for me to try that in 10.10 or 10.04LTS? I do not
have natty and need it in 10.04LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Serge,
NVM, I tested in 10.10 and they work. /etc/default/openipmi is created
and /etc/init.d/openipmi correctly points to /etc/default/openipmi and
/var/lock/ipmi.
So, looks like a winner to me.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Serge, if nobody has tried it I can try it out.
Jamie, risking going off-topic, how do you compare freeipmi with
openipmi?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openipmi
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
apt-cache policy openipmi
openipmi:
Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0
500
Serge, if nobody has tried it I can try it out.
Jamie, risking going off-topic, how do you compare freeipmi with
openipmi?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473332
Title:
Startup
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openipmi
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
Release:10.04
apt-cache policy openipmi
openipmi:
Installed: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.0.16-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.0.16-1ubuntu1 0
500
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: atftp
I was going to replace atftpd with tftpd-hpa, so I told my machine to
remove it (apt-get remove --purge atftpd). When it came time to remove
the tftpboot dir, it barked
rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/tftpboot': Is a directory
Well,we both know that
--
package atftpd failed to properly uninstall: subprocess installed post-removal
script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
So, if ureadahead is not the guilty party, who is?
I have a few 10.04 LTS servers which I have configured with separated
/var and they have been working fine so far knock on wood.
I have another 10.04 LTS machine in which I created a separate partition
for /var but forgot to configure it during
I too am experiencing the same problem; here are the first lines in my
/var/log/boot.log file:
init: mounted-tmp main process (320) terminated with status 127^M
mountall: Event failed
fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2
fsck from util-linux-ng 2.17.2
/dev/sda2: clean, 66135/122160 files, 410049/488192
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubumirror
PROBLEM:
Sometimes the mirror we are syncing from (using ubumirror) is either currently
syncing or has aborted during a sync and not cleaned up the .~tmp~ directories.
As a result, we end up having log messages that look like this:
receiving
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: php-pear
When I use version 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.5 of php-pear on a website under
ubuntu 10.04 (apache2, php5), I find the following messages in my log
file:
[Fri Oct 08 12:44:58 2010] [error] [client 192.168.11.154] PHP
Deprecated: Assigning the return
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: php-pear
When I use version 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.5 of php-pear on a website under
ubuntu 10.04 (apache2, php5), I find the following messages in my log
file:
[Fri Oct 08 12:44:58 2010] [error] [client 192.168.11.154] PHP
Deprecated: Assigning the return
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:56 AM, CzP 503...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Please https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/623354 for a
backport test package, and test it. Currently I only have Maverick
installed...
It seems to work for me. Very low load so far. Will let it loose
for a
Is it going to be backported to 10.04 LTS?
--
update syslog-ng to version 3.0 or 3.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Any chance of this being backported to Lucid? According to
http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/syslog-ng, it comes with 2.0.9 which
according to http://www.syslog.org/forum/syslog-ng/syslog-
using-99-of-a-cpu/ (a post of mine, if I may say so), it is rather
ancient and buggy.
--
update syslog-ng to
I too am experiencing it with a fresh install of 10.04 LTS:
modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-23-server/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No
such device
--
Warning during boot: WARNING: Error inserting padlock_sha
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ssmtp
Would it be possible to add to the documentation the largest email (with
its attachment) that can be sent through ssmtp? Is it an absolute or
machine-specific?
** Affects: ssmtp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Maximum
Will it be backported to Jaunty?
--
dbus-daemon: Rejected send message for indicator-applet spams
/var/log/auth.log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: request-tracker3.8
OS is the beta version of 9.10. Here is the behaviour I would expect
(i.e. it works in 3.6):
r...@tickets:~# sudo /usr/sbin/rt-setup-database-3.6 --action init --dba rtuser
--dba-password mssw
Now creating a database for RT.
Creating
48 matches
Mail list logo
