Hello Grant, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Versions from my report: update-notifier 3.192.54.6 on Jammy.
** Description changed:
I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update-
notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive
unless I subscribe to Pro.
Actual behaviour: However, I am also
Public bug reported:
I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update-
notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive
unless I subscribe to Pro.
Actual behaviour: However, I am also receiving notifications that tell
me about Pro-only updates when I am not
The performance-tools package is ready for review from:
ppa:racb/experimental
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055432
Title:
[needs-packaging] Metapackage for performance engineering
on the following packages:
procps
sysstat
iproute2
numactl
bpfcc-tools
bpftrace
perf-tools-unstable
trace-cmd
nicstat
ethtool
tiptop
sysprof
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: needs-packaging
--
You received this bug
** Also affects: pure-ftpd (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876597
Title:
package pure-ftpd-common 1.0.49-4 failed to
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054219
Title:
Debian installer segfaults on
** Also affects: ngspice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048906
Title:
ngspice-36 crashes in various ways
To manage
Regression bug 2055046 filed - thank you! I understand a new upload is
on the way.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic
verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-failed
** Tags added: regression-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055046
Title:
ubuntu-pro-client:3 duplicate log entry for /var/log/ubuntu-advantage-
license-check.log
To manage
In #ubuntu-security just now:
14:44 sarnold: please could we have a definitive nack if you
don't want bug 1981807 in the security pocket? Looking at the previous
IRC conversation, it looks like it was a "decision pending review".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
> We would - for example - in Ubuntu have a problem with an old
libmysqlclient that is installed along a new mysql-8 that brings newer
incompatible charsets to /usr/share/mysql.
Isn't this just an assumption? AIUI, the only thing that is clear is
that MariaDB doesn't understand the latest data
> The exact conditions for reproducing this bug on mixed IPv4/IPv6
networks are not known
Looking at the upstream commit description, isn't it just that a DHCPv6
lease expires and the server NAKs a request for the same IP again? Or is
that not sufficient to trigger the problem.
In any case, I
Hello Shih-Yuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.99.22.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lvm2 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/2.03.07-1ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libsdl2 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/2.0.20+dfsg-2ubuntu1.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
In the meantime a straightforward workaround is available to users
affected by this bug, which is to install the required dependencies
manually.
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You
This looks fine and I'm accepting. I wonder though if we can stage it to
bundle it with an update that directly impacts users? Otherwise every
qemu user will have to download this update for no benefit to them.
I don't feel too strongly about this. I'll set the tag, but if time has
passed and
Hello Matt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted php7.4 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.4/7.4.3-4ubuntu2.11 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
An upload of cups to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "As requested in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/comments/4;.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted keyutils into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.6-6ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted keyutils into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
An upload of php7.4 to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "See previous comment".
** Changed in: php7.4 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I discussed this with other members of the SRU team last week. My notes:
"...that would be a maintenance action being fixed in an SRU, and may
pull the rug from under users’ feet by forcibly upgrading them after it
has been working on Focal for years. The security implications should be
dealt
An upload of php7.4 to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "See previous comment".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968228
Title:
RTD
An upload of reprepro to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "Includes changes not normally
acceptable for an SRU with no explanation.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libnotify into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnotify/0.7.7-3ubuntu0.18.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Sorry I missed your reply, but to make progress I just tweaked the
version string in a new upload that I signed. It's otherwise identical.
So I'll just accept that.
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic
--
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libfprint into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfprint/1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Unsubscribed sponsors.
** Changed in: libfprint (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936302
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libfprint into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfprint/1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu4~21.10.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Apart from that the Bionic upload looks fine. I note that notification-
Handle-snap-applications.patch is added over the SRU for Focal, but that
makes sense as that functionality is required for the other patches.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
+libnotify (0.7.7-3ubuntu0.20.04.1) bionic; urgency=medium
Shouldn't this be ...0.18.04.1? The version number used will work, but
is confusing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802483
Hello Max, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Honza, or anyone else affected,
Accepted breezy-debian into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy-
debian/2.8.10ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Honza, or anyone else affected,
Accepted breezy-debian into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy-
debian/2.8.32ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The fix for this is stuck in kinetic-proposed on a component mismatch,
so I'm changing the status to Fix Committed to reflect that. If the
upload is pulled from kinetic-proposed then we'll end up with a higher
version in Jammy than in Kinetic so I think it's important to correctly
note that it
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted deja-dup into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/42.9-1ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968805
Title:
Hibernation fails when an additional swapfile is added due to priority
mismatch
To manage notifications about
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu9.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into impish-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu11.21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Accepted, but please adjust your Test Plan to actually test the previous
missing *functionality* of opencryptoki+EP11+Dilithium from a user's
perspective. This means something like "verify that a user can use their
token to authenticate against X" rather than "verify that the library
supports X".
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu5.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.17.0+dfsg+20220202.b40982e-0ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into impish-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.16.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal-gtk into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal-gtk/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Thank you for the further details Jeremy.
Seb, Jeremy and I discussed this more out of band, with me wearing my TB
hat as this request matches "other cases where such upstream automatic
testing is not available, exceptions must still be approved by at least
one member of the Ubuntu Technical
For reference, here's what I see with some of the noise removed:
1001_keep-symbol-DumpThreadHandles-if-debugging-is-disabled.patch is
carried forward. The change to winpr/libwinpr/thread/thread.c is now
gone. The change to winpr/include/winpr/thread.h remains.
All other patches previously
Oh I see them now. Sorry for the noise. I'll delete this and the last
comment in a bit to try and keep the noise in the bug down.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Title:
Update
> The final change is backporting another patch set (from the stable
branch after the 2.7.0 release).
Where is this change in the upload please? I haven't managed to spot it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: freerdp2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Title:
Update freerdp2 to 2.7.0
To manage notifications about
This request doesn't seem to fit SRU policy. Could you please provide
specifics that explain why users need the update beyond "bug fixes", and
a plan to test that the specific issues users are experiencing are
fixed?
Further, I expect one bug per issue being fixed in the diff so they can
be
Good job finding a solution that works!
What's the status on Debian accepting something like this?
This also seems like a pattern that would be useful elsewhere. Is it
already an established pattern?
I'm reluctant to take this for an SRU without having confidence that we
won't end up iterating
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second
question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you to all involved in the discussion and analysis for carefully
considering the regression risk there. Regardless of the final decision,
I think the thoughtful consideration makes this an exemplary SRU.
I confirmed that the new upload is simply a straightforward review on
top of the
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64
build. Can't we just hit that?
If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going
through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then
it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left
This reminds me of bug 1384503, and a search reveals some other bugs
that may be related too. Perhaps it's a recurrence of the same
underlying issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The SRUs already landed related to minor version bumps (eg. 5.3.0-1.1 to
5.3.0-1.3~ubuntu20.04) and the entire set of changes were accounted and
considered for SRU purposes by the SRU documentation provided.
This doesn't apply to the Bionic Unapproved upload though, as 5.1.1-1 to
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970737
Title:
Stalled IO Operations During MySQL Tests (with sysbench)
To manage notifications about this bug
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971788
Title:
Failure to enable SSL out of the box when in fips mode
To manage notifications about this bug go
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello bs, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not,
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds
like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to.
In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then
drop that delta in subsequent
I think this is blocked pending bug 1874719?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968039
Title:
DEP-8 test fails in Focal after Corosync update
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971565
Title:
charm no longer works with latest mysql-router version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gvfs has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100
Title:
Slow file dialogs, open and save
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-jammy
** Tags added: lto verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can
Hello Rik, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kstars into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kstars/5:3.5.7-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Thank you msaxl and Adrian for performing the verification!
I've also verified in the build log that lto optimisation is now
missing. For example:
cc -DDEBUG_PPPD -DTRUST_PPPD_TO_DIE -O2 -fno-builtin -Wall -DSANITY
-DLINUX -I/include/ -DIP_ALLOCATION -DUSE_KERNEL -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-
map=/<>=.
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Hi Po-Hsu Lin,
Sorry, there's also a decompression step. The relevant code is:
https://git.launchpad.net/uvtool/tree/uvtool/libvirt/__init__.py#n45
It's possible this could be optimized if libvirt's API has had any
enhancements since I wrote that code. It looks like I did it this way
because I
Hi,
In uvtool this is by design. It has to download the entire image before
it can cryptographically verify it, and only then does it start
injecting the image into libvirt. It does that using libvirt's socket
API. Using that mechanism, I don't think it's possible to do a
filesystem-level move to
I uploaded a rebuild of xl2tpd to fix this in Kinetic, but it is still
pending SRU review for Jammy (22.04).
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
Thank you for testing the fix! I've now uploaded the fix for inclusion
in an update to 22.04. This is now awaiting SRU team review (I shouldn't
do that myself as I prepared it). Once the fix is accepted, we will ask
for testing again of the final package binary before it is published to
updates.
Filed upstream: https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
** Bug watch added: github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues #232
https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Public bug reported:
See bug 1951832 for details of the failure. That bug tracks the
regressed UX and will be resolved with a workaround. This bug tracks the
issue that LTO cannot be enabled on this package.
** Affects: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Triaged
--
You
101 - 200 of 12236 matches
Mail list logo
