Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello bs, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not,
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds
like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to.
In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then
drop that delta in subsequent
I think this is blocked pending bug 1874719?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968039
Title:
DEP-8 test fails in Focal after Corosync update
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971565
Title:
charm no longer works with latest mysql-router version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gvfs has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100
Title:
Slow file dialogs, open and save
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-jammy
** Tags added: lto verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can
Hello Rik, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kstars into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kstars/5:3.5.7-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Thank you msaxl and Adrian for performing the verification!
I've also verified in the build log that lto optimisation is now
missing. For example:
cc -DDEBUG_PPPD -DTRUST_PPPD_TO_DIE -O2 -fno-builtin -Wall -DSANITY
-DLINUX -I/include/ -DIP_ALLOCATION -DUSE_KERNEL -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-
map=/<>=.
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Hi Po-Hsu Lin,
Sorry, there's also a decompression step. The relevant code is:
https://git.launchpad.net/uvtool/tree/uvtool/libvirt/__init__.py#n45
It's possible this could be optimized if libvirt's API has had any
enhancements since I wrote that code. It looks like I did it this way
because I
Hi,
In uvtool this is by design. It has to download the entire image before
it can cryptographically verify it, and only then does it start
injecting the image into libvirt. It does that using libvirt's socket
API. Using that mechanism, I don't think it's possible to do a
filesystem-level move to
I uploaded a rebuild of xl2tpd to fix this in Kinetic, but it is still
pending SRU review for Jammy (22.04).
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
Thank you for testing the fix! I've now uploaded the fix for inclusion
in an update to 22.04. This is now awaiting SRU team review (I shouldn't
do that myself as I prepared it). Once the fix is accepted, we will ask
for testing again of the final package binary before it is published to
updates.
Filed upstream: https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
** Bug watch added: github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues #232
https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Public bug reported:
See bug 1951832 for details of the failure. That bug tracks the
regressed UX and will be resolved with a workaround. This bug tracks the
issue that LTO cannot be enabled on this package.
** Affects: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Triaged
--
You
Users affected on 22.04: please test the fix from ppa:racb/fixes
(https://launchpad.net/~racb/+archive/ubuntu/fixes?field.series_filter=jammy).
This is the minimal change to disable LTO, and is the fix I intend to
propose for 22.04 if it is reported to work.
If this does work, then I'll need:
1)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881
Title:
Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> I'm not sure how to do that in packaging except to try to guide the
user into somehow not following the broken installation flow.
Maybe, *if* it's never useful to use corosync with the default shipped
corosync.conf, we should just not ship it, and add a
James said:
> Setting the pacemaker distro task back to new - it seems very odd that
a system designed to manage a cluster of servers would install on every
node with a non-unique node id, which is a change in behaviour from
older versions of the same software.
In Jammy, I think this is still
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951832 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1951832
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/LTO
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Looks like this needs someone familiar with Ubuntu process to arrange
either disabling link time optimisation or to use msaxl's patch in
comment 30. I don't know which would be correct and would want to
consult with others on the LTO thing.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
Fix available upstream so this should be trivial to cherry-pick now. It
might be worth taking a briefly deeper look from a security perspective
because of the force untaint.
In 3.5 years nobody else reported themselves as affected though.
@Giuseppe would you still benefit from this fix? If so I
I verified that this is fixed when upgrading from Focal to Jammy.
Method:
lxc launch ubuntu:focal test
lxc exec test bash
apt -y update && apt -y full-upgrade
apt -y install python-is-python2
do-release-upgrade -d
do-release-upgrade does suggest removing python-is-python2 as obsolete
after the
This works for me. Thanks! Now I just have to look for the button
circles to tell if I'm looking at an active window or not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967747
Title:
Lack of
** Description changed:
Expected behaviour: no unnecessary prompts during do-release-upgrade
Actual behaviour: needrestart prompts during do-release-upgrade
Steps to reproduce:
- lxc launch ubuntu:focal reproducer
+ lxc launch ubuntu:impish reproducer
lxc exec reproducer bash
apt-get
ged in: at (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968874
Title:
Upgrades from Focal to Jammy pull in Postfix
To manage notifications
FTR, tumbleweed reviewed the change in principle for me in #ubuntu-
devel. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958720
Title:
python3-yaml and python3-six are not
Uploaded fixes for pyyaml and six. Now awaiting release team approval.
I'll set Fix Committed; this can always be undone if they refuse.
** Changed in: six (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
** Changed in: pyyaml (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Com
I did some research to ensure that removing the Breaks is safe. Some of
this repeats what we covered already but I'm stating it again so my
logic is self-contained here.
If python-is-python2 is installed on Focal and I upgrade to Jammy, then
python-is-python2 gets removed because of the Breaks.
In my test I think I got prompted twice (I said no to restarts as
they're unnecessary as I expect to reboot when it's done). The pain of
this is that release upgrades usually take a while, so every prompt may
mean hours delay in the entire upgrade process since the user might not
come back for a
Public bug reported:
Expected behaviour: no unnecessary prompts during do-release-upgrade
Actual behaviour: needrestart prompts during do-release-upgrade
Steps to reproduce:
lxc launch ubuntu:focal reproducer
lxc exec reproducer bash
apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade # needrestart prompts,
Lukas FYI.
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968874
Title:
Upgrades from Focal to Jammy pull in Postfix
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
lxc launch ubuntu:focal reproducer
lxc exec reproducer bash
do-release-upgrade -d
Expected: no Postfix debconf prompt
Actual: Postfix debconf prompt
This is bad because there's a debconf prompt at all, but also that users
don't really know how to
Thanks!
Is there any possibility of fixing this in Jammy? I'm aware we're past
UI Freeze but I don't know how that would interact with usability fixes,
exceptions, etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Shubham, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mysql-8.0 into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/8.0.28-0ubuntu0.21.10.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lena, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mysql-8.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lena, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mysql-8.0 into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/8.0.28-0ubuntu0.21.10.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Shubham, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mysql-8.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Christian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ldns into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ldns/1.7.1-2ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Ah OK. Great!
** Changed in: ldns (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Since this is a fragile bug in the sense that the wrong build time
option will silently result in a built binary that has wrong behaviour,
_and_ the Test Plan is straightforward and (I think?) doesn't need an
Internet connection or anything like that, then have you considered a
dep8 test to make
What's the plan for Impish? See comment 33. If this is released to Focal
but not Impish, then users would face a regression when upgrading from
Focal to Impish.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for keyutils has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
This was originally reported against 20.04. I haven't validated that,
but that report seems likely to be correct to me. It's worth considering
an SRU for 20.04 too, but I'm focused elsewhere now. If someone would
like to drive an SRU, then please do!
Things to consider for an SRU:
Are we sure
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961092
Title:
Installing collectd pulls in the X.org stack
To manage
FTR, Seb gave me an ack to drop the Recommends to a Suggests in #ubuntu-
devel last night, so I'm going to go ahead and upload.
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: libnotify (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
-
** Tags added: jammy regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967747
Title:
Lack of visual distinction between active and inactive windows
To manage notifications about
I'm on yaru-theme-gtk 22.04.3.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967747
Title:
Lack of visual distinction between active and inactive windows
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
User story:
I switch virtual workspaces (using Ctrl-Alt-Right) to a workspace with
two terminal windows in it. I start typing into the window I want
because I think it is active already. Expected behaviour: the correct
window gets my input. Actual behaviour: the input goes
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #996104
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996104
** Also affects: dkms (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996104
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
ged in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963835
Title:
Hello Henning, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.11-0ubuntu27.23 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Tags added: network-online-ordering
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774788
Title:
Daemon won't start at boot up (18LTS fully patched)
To manage notifications about this bug go
Thank you for the detailed additional information. I think I understand
the situation properly now, together with the need for the fix.
> That means that if something is currently accepting DHCP offers after
the specified timeout has expired, then that is buggy behaviour.
We sometimes run into
The bug description says:
> Installing evdi-dkms in focal with the latest 5.15 kernel
However your verification says:
> nbjalevi@5CG0491SYD:~$ uname -r
> 5.14.0-1029-oem
It's good to know that the package works on that kernel, but to verify
that the reported bug is actually fixed, shouldn't
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-failed verification-failed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952947
Title:
ubuntu-bug -w
Sorry, the apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.22 to Focal is bad. It looks like
symlinks have inadvertently been expanded. So that one needs fixing
please with a replacement upload for Focal. Impish is fine, so I've
released that one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apport has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemtap has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Does grub2-signed need rebuilding? I don't think I fully understand the
interaction between the two packages, so I'm being extra cautious before
releasing for fear of breaking the world.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This was blocked due to incorrect metadata in bug 1891481 (nobody had
marked it verified).
However, I think block-proposed-focal is probably also appropriate for
this bug. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Staging_low_priority_uploads.
If you disagree, please remove the tag with
Since this bug was to fix an FTBFS, it's sufficient to verify that
2.11.0-0ubuntu5 did build successfully. However block-proposed-focal
still seems appropriate.
** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pam-ssh-agent-auth has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for landscape-client has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966432
Title:
audio crackling on usb sound card
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you for working with us to try and get a test plan for Ubuntu
together.
How about this:
1) I'll accept the package (1.44.1-1ubuntu1.1) into focal-proposed.
2) You test using your Ubuntu VM as best as you can to ensure that the package
hasn't regressed for Ubuntu users.
3) You verify the
This bug was fixed in the package mariadb-10.6 - 1:10.6.7-3
Sponsored for Dan Bungert (dbungert)
---
mariadb-10.6 (1:10.6.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix syntax error in unstable tests lists
* Forward patches upstream and update metadata for them
* Bugfix: Include missing
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ceph-iscsi into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-
iscsi/3.4-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ceph-iscsi into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph-
iscsi/3.4-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Sorry I'm having problems getting my email to them - it's stuck in
moderation on the ubuntu-flavors@ ML. I have asked again to try and find
who moderates it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted keyutils into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keyutils/1.5.9-9.2ubuntu2.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
I think we've concluded that we're not going to ship the configuration
file parts in the Impish and Focal uploads, so I'll reject them from the
queue now. The Bionic queue upload is ready now though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I don't think there's anything further for us to do in Ubuntu unless a
patch becomes available or until 8.0.29 is released, so I'm moving it
back to Triaged and unassigning it for now.
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: mysql-
> [Test plan]
Please could you add to the test plan testing to ensure that the new
configurable timeout actually works? There's a lot of code being added
just to make this configurable, including an entirely new configuration
file and extensive by-hand C parsing code. I think we should ensure
Still awaiting SRU information please.
** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857026
Title:
OVN doesn't seem to support
Still awaiting SRU information please.
** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957817
Title:
Multicast traffic is
The obvious minimal fix would be something like:
-if ("un-blacklisting" in result) or ("isn't blacklisted" in result):
+if (b"un-blacklisting" in result) or (b"isn't blacklisted" in result):
...since in Ubuntu Focal and Impish we know that we're running on Python
3, so 2+3
Hello Hui, or anyone else affected,
Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-
conf/1.2.2-1ubuntu0.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nfs-ganesha into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-
ganesha/3.0.3-0ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947099
Title:
ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some
It looks like verification is still needed against linux-firmware
1.187.27 in focal-proposed?
** Tags removed: verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needede-focal
** Tags removed: verification-needede-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug
Can you confirm the package version that was used with proposed enabled
please? We've had serious regressions in the past because the version
released accidentally did not match the version tested, so I want to
make sure that the version I release is the version you tested.
Note that this is
The verification of the Stable Release Update for keepalived has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
> Verification was performed on Focal with proposed enabled
Can you confirm the package version that was used with proposed enabled
please? We've had serious regressions in the past because the version
released accidentally did not match the version tested, so I want to
make sure that the version
(note that I haven't actually reviewed the upload yet)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959993
Title:
SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)
To manage notifications
At yesterday's SRU team meeting we concluded that we don't want the
archive to end up going down in versions as you upgrade from Focal to
Impish. IOW, we aren't granting an exception in this case. Some reasons:
The time a security update is needed in the future would not be an
appropriate time to
Oh, now maybe I see what you mean. If upgrading from Focal to Jammy
without going through Impish, you'll have a "too-old" version of python-
is-python2? Let me think about this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> I don't see how that Breaks is relevant. "python" != "python-is-
python2", so python3-yaml having a breaks on *python* (<< 2.7.18)
doesn't have any direct impact on the python-is-python2 package. And
Jammy ships python2 2.7.18-3 anyway.
Sorry, I now see that python-is-python2 Provides "python".
I've investigated and I don't understand the issue. Has something
changed in the archive?
On a Jammy system I was able to install python2, python2.7, python3-yaml
and python3-six, as well as manually install the python-is-python2
package from Impish. I didn't hit any co-installability problems.
201 - 300 of 12260 matches
Mail list logo
