> To support fixing other bugs in fwupd, libjcat needs to be upgraded to
a newer release in focal
Please could you expand on this? Paraphrasing, this reads to me as
equivalent to saying "we need to SRU this". This may be true, but merely
stating this does not help me review whether an SRU is
An upload of libjcat to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "This is objectively not a "no change
rebuild in focal" as claimed in the changelog.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
A couple of thoughts:
1)
In addition to future supported platforms, what about weird third party
hacked up things? Are we going to end up with reports from users who
have grabbed a custom image for some esoteric platform from someone who
is hacking something together for that platform by basing
> labelling them as Raspberry Pi would exacerbate the issue
Sorry, I should have acknowledged that Dave's proposal would avoid this
issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920837
> Is it better to fix this in Ubuntu or INSIST on it coming in via
Debian?
I appreciate you efforts in helping to make Ubuntu better here. However
if we upload this to Ubuntu then we have to then start merging against
every package update in Debian, and if we don't then the package
languishes
Uploaded the debdiff in comment 1, with a couple of minor changes:
1) I ran update-maintainer to comply with
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField
2) I tweaked the version string to 1.5.5-1ubuntu0.1 to fit the scheme
recommended at
** Description changed:
[IMPACT]
umount.davfs consistently segfault in focal. This leads to a number of
medium severity issues.
- inability to unmount (this might have security implications)
- inability to remount
- autofs fails to unmount
- reports of higher load in
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted docker.io into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted docker.io into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.4.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.4.4-0ubuntu1~18.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opengcs into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opengcs/0.3.4+dfsg2-0ubuntu3.18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opengcs into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opengcs/0.3.4+dfsg2-0ubuntu3.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opengcs into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opengcs/0.3.4+dfsg2-0ubuntu4.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted golang-github-containers-buildah into groovy-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-containers-
buildah/1.15.2-1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libpod into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/2.0.6+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
> 1) According to Lucas, this should not be a problem because we are
backporting a version from Hirsute, which already contains the postinst
excerpt you're referring to (the ZFS one, if I'm understanding
correctly). The extra hunk that is being added to the posting script is
just related to ZFS,
An upload of at to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "See previous comment".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464051
Title:
at does not
An upload of at to groovy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "See previous comment".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464051
Title:
at does not
I discussed this further with Utkarsh. Since there isn't currently a
high impact use case and we have so few people affected since 2015, I'm
going to reject this SRU on the basis that it doesn't meet the bar for
risking regression and download/install bandwidth/time for existing
users. On this
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899248
Title:
package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.21-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 failed to
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dpdk into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/19.11.7-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dpdk into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/19.11.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Tags added: network-online-ordering
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912826
Title:
Knockd service fails to start due to missing dependency
To manage notifications about this bug
Hello Sergey, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nova into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/2:21.1.2-0ubuntu2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
I see that this code change already exists in Ubuntu Hirsute, so I'm
setting that task Fix Released.
> rewriting the bug desciption to follow the downstream bug template
could cause confution in some cases so that might be better to keep in a
comment
FWIW, from the Ubuntu SRU team perspective I
> This isn't a Ubuntu decision - upstream of the package/functionality
goes this way, so if challenged one should challenge it there.
I disagree. This is entirely a question of how we integrate between
services. The distribution is where that integration happens, and users
expect consistency of
Hello Kai-Chuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-
conf/1.2.2-1ubuntu0.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Kai-Chuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-
conf/1.2.2-1ubuntu5.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Please could you clarify the use case that requires sub-minute
precision? Without an explanation of this, I don't see how an SRU is
justified here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm not sure it's *ever* correct for distribution packaging to ship
After=network-online.target. One person's "wait for the network to come
online" is another person's "my system hangs on boot because I'm booting
offline" and yet another person's "one NIC was up but the one through
which DNS is
Alternatively, if this is an exceptional case for which the upstream
recommendation shouldn't apply, this should be clearly documented.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918141
Title:
** Tags added: network-online-ordering
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918141
Title:
nfs-server.service needs name resolution and network online
To manage notifications about this
Hello vmware-gos-Yuhua, or anyone else affected,
Accepted open-vm-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-
tools/2:11.2.5-2ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello vmware-gos-Yuhua, or anyone else affected,
Accepted open-vm-tools into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-
tools/2:11.2.5-2ubuntu1~ubuntu20.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello lordaro, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libapache2-mod-perl2 into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache2-mod-
perl2/2.0.11-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by
SRU +1 for opengcs as currently in Bionic, Focal and Groovy Unapproved.
I prefer to accept all related packages together to avoid confusion, so
I intend to accept these together with containerd and docker.io when
they are ready (currently waiting on feedback from my review at
SRU +1 for libpod and golang-github-containers-buildah as currently in
Groovy Unapproved. I prefer to accept all related packages together to
avoid confusion, so I intend to accept these together with containerd
and docker.io when they are ready (currently waiting on feedback from my
review at
I SRU reviewed the docker.io and containerd uploads in the Bionic and
Focal queues. I did not consider SRU acceptability in general since this
has already been accepted into Groovy; only differences for Bionic and
Focal, and anything possibly overlooked, matter.
I found three changes in packaging
I don't think it's worth maintaining a difference against Debian for
that either. I think it would just add to the confusion. So my answer is
the same: if Debian changes, we'll follow.
Secondarily, I'm not sure how you'd implement looking in both places
either. And what if two different
> This particular update is not able to cause any regressions, because
the software did not work before it.
What about on amd64? Am I right in understanding that this bug only
affects ppc64el? But we have no choice but to rebuild for all
architectures.
Accepting, but please could you add
Hello Tianon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gosu into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gosu/1.10-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Tianon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gosu into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gosu/1.10-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:14:23AM -, Karl Grindley wrote:
> I'll also comment, (and perhaps a bit of scope creap, but...) we've
> found a number of unfixed issues with sssd, specifically with PKINIT and
> LDAP optimizations. We're working with the upstream maintainers to help
> address
Karl, thank you for the detailed writeup? This looks very useful. I'll
leave Marco to respond as he drove the change in question, but a couple
of less technical comments:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:16:28AM -, Karl Grindley wrote:
> I don't discourage this change, in fact, will help push along
> Karl, thank you for the detailed writeup?
That was intended to say:
Karl, thank you for the detailed writeup!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919563
Title:
updated sssd with
Karl, thank you for your report.
We now need to decide an appropriate course of action here. An update to
sssd to revert the change is a possibility, but there's also risk there
that we will break users twice.
Do you have a deployment affected by this? How many other users might be
affected by
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915275
Title:
mysql-8.0 regressed on riscv64 due to new glibc
To manage
There's at least one feature change in 0.10.1 -> 0.10.2, but I accepted
it on the basis that this package is completely broken right now, so it
shouldn't matter to users who cannot be regressed further.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hello Sean, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xfce4-weather-plugin into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4
-weather-plugin/0.10.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello Sean, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xfce4-weather-plugin into groovy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4
-weather-plugin/0.10.2-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello Balint, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnutls28 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/3.6.13-2ubuntu1.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
See also: bug 1915547
> It is highly unlikely that the configuration file on one distro is
replaced with one that was shipped on a different one.
I think it's more likely than you say in cases that a configuration
shipped is primarily a set of boolean values and enumerations of a
limited set of
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted unattended-upgrades into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/unattended-upgrades/1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7 in a few hours, and then
in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Imagine a package shipping config file with contents "foo: true; bar:
false". You might put the md5 of that in the ucf history, so that
packaging that later changes to "foo: true; bar: true" knows that if the
user has anything other than "foo: true; bar: false" then it is a
customisation that
** Summary changed:
- sru unattended-upgrades (1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.6 update to
1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.7 ) Xenial
+ Users are prompted by ucf on upgrade from Trusty to Xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hello Ian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xsane into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane/0.999-8ubuntu2.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
OK, so we should fix pgrep to fix that. There's little sense in working
around it when we can just patch pgrep in Ubuntu. You have bug 1874824
for that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks. We try!
I used a Bionic lxd container on a Hirsute host machine, with whatever
the default is for limits.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917157
Title:
run-this-one is very
Like Debian, I think it's acceptable for the schema to be in the samba-
doc package.
Summary:
samba.schema missing: Invalid (it's not missing; it ships in samba-doc)
This led to:
Please ship samba.schema in the samba package: Won't Fix (no plans to do
this; maintainers consider samba-doc
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Based on your explanation, the "official" packaging for openvpn in
Ubuntu uses /etc/openvpn. It's the distribution packaging that gets to
choose the configuration file layout, so this isn't a bug per se, and
nor
Patch available at https://gitlab.com/procps-
ng/procps/-/commit/bb96fc42956c9ed926a1b958ab715f8b4a663dec
** Tags added: bitesize patch rls-hh-incoming
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I can reproduce this. I quickly instrumented run-this-one to see why it
takes time. The pgrep took 5.4ms, so avoiding the pgrep won't help. The
lsof call took 1376ms, so that's where most of the delay is. There's
Yes, this can be backported to Focal. It will need somebody affected to
commit to doing the necessary QA after the update is prepared (without
that QA, we won't be able to land the update).
The process is documented at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure as gregor
correctly
Thank you for the analysis, Sean. I think this explains the problem. It
looks like the init_proxy() function is run unconditionally by update-
manager when it starts, so any maintainer scripts spawned by update-
manager are incorrectly being given an http(s)_proxy environment
variable in this
I'm adding a Focal task as requested in #ubuntu-bugs. However, please
don't take this as an endorsement for a Focal SRU. If it's just spurious
log entries, I'm not sure if an SRU would be appropriate or not.
** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You
Hello Bold, or anyone else affected,
Accepted node-uid-number into groovy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-uid-
number/0.0.6-1ubuntu0.20.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Bold, or anyone else affected,
Accepted node-uid-number into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/node-uid-
number/0.0.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello NoBugs!, or anyone else affected,
Accepted geoclue-2.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geoclue-2.0/2.5.6-0ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubiquity into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/20.04.15.11
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Kamal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted wireguard-linux-compat into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/wireguard-linux-compat/1.0.20201112-1~18.04.3 in a few hours, and then
in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-oslo.vmware into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
oslo.vmware/2.26.0-0ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hi Anton,
Sorry, I had not also released the enigmail update. I have done that
now. Once this gets mirrored out, I think your problem should be fixed.
Please let us know.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for thunderbird has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for thunderbird has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for thunderbird has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The Groovy fix looks fine.
Backporting the Groovy package to Focal also looks fine to me on
principle. Even though it is a major upstream version update, the actual
functional upstream change is just to enable building against Linux 5.6,
and that's what we're fixing here anyway. I also note that
Hello Kleber, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xtables-addons into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xtables-
addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted sssd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/2.2.3-3ubuntu0.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
This is fixed in Hirsute, which has sssd 2.4.0-1ubuntu3.
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908065
Title:
Hello Valters, or anyone else affected,
Accepted sssd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/2.2.3-3ubuntu0.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Thank you for working on this!
Conflicts is a little too strong perhaps, and are best avoided to give
apt the most leeway to resolve things. Can you pick from
https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition please? Unversioned is also
unusual; I'd expect versioned relationships in this case I think.
Thanks!
As discussed on IRC: the versioned Depends is also not needed for
Bionic. I dropped the changelog version bump as this is not needed as
the previous upload was never published.
I also ran update-maintainer since that hadn't been run.
I'm not sure who sponsored your previous upload, but
> + certs = CERT_CreateSubjectCertList (NULL, handle,
>derSubject,
Doesn't this need a return value test? AFAICT,
CERT_CreateSubjectCertList might return NULL, and CERTLIST_HEAD (certs)
will unconditionally look up a member? There's a second instance of this
pattern in
The Hirsute fix is in hirsute-proposed.
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915051
Title:
Hello Marcelo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dkms into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.8.3-4ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Marcelo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted dkms into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.8.1-5ubuntu2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
> Please note that this change depends on the proposed fixes for
xtables-addons (bug 1915177).
Thank you for calling this out.
Your uploads of west-chamber look fine to me, except that I don't see
any relationship with xtables-addons expressed. Exactly how does this
change depend on the
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pollinate into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pollinate/4.33-3ubuntu1.20.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pollinate into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pollinate/4.33-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pollinate into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pollinate/4.33-3ubuntu1.20.10.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Paride, or anyone else affected,
Accepted thunderbird into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted thunderbird into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted thunderbird into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted jsunit into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jsunit/0.2.2-2ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tinyjsd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tinyjsd/1.2+git1-1ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted thunderbird into groovy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/1:78.7.1+build1-0ubuntu0.20.10.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
This is fixed in Hirsute now. Backports to Focal and Bionic may be
appropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882527
Title:
mysql timeoutsec results in killing mysql process
To
I fixed a few things up, figuring we'd done enough back and forthing on
this already. For the record:
The cinnamon Groovy debdiff didn't apply, but as it's supposed to be the
same as the patch being applied to Focal, I picked up your changelog
entry and manually took the quilt patch from Focal.
src:mysql-8.0 is supposed to honour nocheck already, I think, via
debhelper (it only overrides dh_auto_test). Did you get the test run
because the riscv64 nocheck disablement doesn't apply to bileto?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
801 - 900 of 12260 matches
Mail list logo
