[Bug 1879290] Re: pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW

2020-05-21 Thread Seth Forshee
I think the answer here is to stop passing "console=ttyS0". This is something that is typically only done for debugging. dmesg shows a 14 second delay between the "console [tty1] enabled" and "console [ttyS0] enabled" messages. I suspect that because console=ttyS0 is passed the kernel is going to

[Bug 1879690] Re: Docker registry doesn't stay up and keeps restarting

2020-05-20 Thread Seth Forshee
I confirmed that 5.4.0-29 does not show the problem, and -31 does. Then I built -31 with these three patches reverted: UBUNTU: SAUCE: overlayfs: fix shitfs special-casing UBUNTU: SAUCE: overlayfs: use shiftfs hacks only with shiftfs as underlay UBUNTU: SAUCE: overlayfs: allow with shiftfs as

[Bug 1879454] Re: Set CONFIG_USELIB=n in Ubuntu kernels

2020-05-19 Thread Seth Forshee
On the surface this seems like a reasonable thing to do. However I think someone from foundations should weigh in on the topic too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879454 Title: Set

[Bug 1879290] Re: pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW

2020-05-18 Thread Seth Forshee
Based on the video it looks like the first kernel messages which appear on the screen have timestamps >20s, so it seems likely at least part of the delay is in the kernel. If you can supply dmesg we might be able to get some idea of where this delay is happening. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1879077] Re: package linux-firmware 1.157.23 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2020-05-18 Thread Seth Forshee
Sorry, I misread something before. I thought you were running 16.04 now. You are running 14.04, so 3.13 is the correct kernel, it is not an "old" kernel for that release. Do you need to have casper installed? If not, the easiest thing to do would be to uninstall casper, then run the upgrade

[Bug 1875263] Re: linux-firmware: missing sof-cfl.ri symbol link for Bionic and Eoan

2020-05-18 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1879077] Re: package linux-firmware 1.157.23 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2020-05-18 Thread Seth Forshee
I see two problems. 1. You have a very old kernel installed (3.13.0-38), which is causing this message: "E: amd64-microcode: unsupported kernel version!" I'm not sure if this is causing update-initramfs to fail, but if you don't need this kernel you should just remove it. 2. These messages:

[Bug 1873325] Re: update-initramfs complains of missing amdgpu firmware files

2020-05-15 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: + SRU Justification + + Impact: amdgpu references firmware files in modinfo which have not been + supplied to linux-firmware. This causes update-initramfs to generate + "Possible missing firmware" warnings. + + Fix: Since the firmware is not available, all we can do is

[Bug 1873325] Re: update-initramfs complains of missing amdgpu firmware files

2020-05-15 Thread Seth Forshee
AMD has not released this firmware to linux-firmware. For now all we can do is remove the files from modinfo so that update-initramfs will stop complaining. ** Package changed: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1875263] Re: linux-firmware: missing sof-cfl.ri symbol link for Bionic and Eoan

2020-05-14 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1875665] Re: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make ourselves RT: Operation not permitted after upgrade to 20.04

2020-05-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-gcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-oracle (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 1876847] Re: HP-Spectre 2019 Intel wireless driver is detected incorrectly.

2020-05-08 Thread Seth Forshee
The firmware load messages are not unusual. The driver will try to load a range of firmware versions, and often the "newest" version the driver looks for has not been released by Intel. As long as it finds supported firmware version (as indicated by the "loaded firmware version" message) there's

[Bug 1876847] Re: HP-Spectre 2019 Intel wireless driver is detected incorrectly.

2020-05-08 Thread Seth Forshee
Don't worry too much about what lspci says. It just has a database to map PCI ids to names, and it currently considers anything with the id 8086:02f0 to be a 9462. The correct driver (iwlwifi) is being used, and it identifies your wireless correctly, so that is what matters. Can you please

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-05-08 Thread Seth Forshee
The mailing list for i915 is intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872760 Title: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering To manage

[Bug 1875665] Re: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make ourselves RT: Operation not permitted after upgrade to 20.04

2020-05-07 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: + SRU Justification + + Impact: CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED was enabled in focal, except for the + lowlatency kernel since we expected most RT users to use that kernel. + However we are getting RT regressions with the generic kernel. Digging + deeper into this option, it seems

[Bug 1875665] Re: rtkit-daemon[*]: Failed to make ourselves RT: Operation not permitted after upgrade to 20.04

2020-05-07 Thread Seth Forshee
signed) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received thi

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-30 Thread Seth Forshee
I think the upstream i915 developers might be able to best help you, since the issue still exists in 5.7. I checked and this report looks to be the same problem: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/347 I'd suggest trying to help the developers debug the problem there. Looks like

[Bug 1873506] Re: ubuntu/focal64 fails to mount Vagrant shared folders

2020-04-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Fix sent: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel- team/2020-April/109405.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873506 Title: ubuntu/focal64 fails to mount Vagrant shared folders To

[Bug 1873506] Re: ubuntu/focal64 fails to mount Vagrant shared folders

2020-04-27 Thread Seth Forshee
** Description changed: - Attempting to `vagrant up` using the `ubuntu/focal64` box fails to mount - the `/vagrant` shared folder. `ubuntu/bionic64` works as expected. Here - is the Vagrant error message: + SRU Justification + + Impact: When our kernel packaging was updated to build the

[Bug 1873506] Re: ubuntu/focal64 fails to mount Vagrant shared folders

2020-04-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-24 Thread Seth Forshee
I'm not sure that it's workload-specific, it could also be an issue with a specific driver or any number of things. RCU is widely used in the kernel, so at this point I'm looking for the proverbial needle in the haystack. I am trying to uncover code paths that you might have been exercising that I

[Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-23 Thread Seth Forshee
nee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872964 Title: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-23 Thread Seth Forshee
Please disregard comment #2. These warnings are related to preempt rcu, which is only used in the lowlatency kernel. This seems likely to be caused by an unbalanced rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() happening somewhere before the task schedules. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1872964] Re: Reliable crash in lowlatency kernel with LXD

2020-04-23 Thread Seth Forshee
When you see this in -24, is that still the lowlatency kernel or had you switched it out for generic like you mentioned in the description? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872964

[Bug 1873809] Re: Make linux-kvm bootable in LXD VMs

2020-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Test build with the vsock options: https://people.canonical.com/~sforshee/lp1873809/linux- kvm-5.4.0-1008-kvm/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873809 Title: Make linux-kvm bootable

[Bug 1873912] Re: multipathd.service fails to start with linux-kvm kernel

2020-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Progress ** Changed in: linux-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) ** Description changed: + SRU Justification + + Impact: multipath-tools is installed by default in server images. With + the linux-kvm kernel, multipathd.service fails to start because we do +

[Bug 1873912] [NEW] multipathd.service fails to start with linux-kvm kernel

2020-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: When doing a dist-upgrade in a vm running the linux-kvm kernel, multipath-tools failed because multipathd.service failed to start. Setting up multipath-tools (0.8.3-1ubuntu2) ... Job

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Because someone has to manually flip it once information has been provided. Setting it to confirmed, buy you should also be able to do that for your own bug. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1873800] [NEW] Include device tree blobs in linux-riscv packages

2020-04-20 Thread Seth Forshee
are installed by linux- modules at /lib/firmware//devcie-tree. Regression Potential: Minimal. This should only impact parameters used by drivers, and the parameters should now better match what is needed by the hardware. ** Affects: linux-riscv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seth Forshee

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-17 Thread Seth Forshee
Can you try a vanilla 5.4.30 kernel from here, and see if it has the same problem? That will let us know if any of the fixes we've applied on top of 5.4 is responsible. https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.4.30/ Note that you will need to disable secure boot to boot into this

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-17 Thread Seth Forshee
Actually there is something in the logs that I missed the first time: [ 69.108687] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun Do you know whether earlier 5.4 kernels in focal also had this same issue? If not, do you know the last version you used which

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-17 Thread Seth Forshee
Oh, no that is fine then. Sorry, on the other bug you said the system was unusable after suspend so I assumed that you could not run apport- collect in that state. Unfortunately the logs don't show anything strange happening. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

[Bug 1872760] Re: i915 - after return from suspend display is flickering

2020-04-17 Thread Seth Forshee
The attached logs are from the current boot, which doesn't show anything from when the corruption actually happened. Can you get logs from a previous boot where you did see the corruption? For example, if you know this happened the last time you booted, you can use 'journalctl -b -1', or

[Bug 1853044] Re: 5.3.0-23-generic causes fans to spin when idle

2020-04-17 Thread Seth Forshee
@arno can you file a new bug for this please? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853044 Title: 5.3.0-23-generic causes fans to spin when idle To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1871687] Re: System hard locks up intermittently

2020-04-15 Thread Seth Forshee
I'm not finding much in the logs. There's some i915 splat which could possibly be related to the corruption, but nothing to explain the hard lockup. The current focal-proposed kernel (5.4.0-24) has some fixes for races/deadlocks in i915, so it's worth trying that out to see if it helps. You can

[Bug 1861462] Re: Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon 7th Gen doesn't suspend and resume

2020-04-13 Thread Seth Forshee
@Anmar, I believe this issue should be fixed now. Can you confirm? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861462 Title: Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon 7th Gen doesn't suspend and resume To

[Bug 1866882] Re: segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390

2020-04-09 Thread Seth Forshee
Confirmed that I'm no longer seeing the segfault. Thanks! ** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-10 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1870094] Re: ftbfs in focal

2020-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
You rebuilt the package with a different compiler than what was used to compute the signatures/checksums in the kernel build, so you get different objects and mismatching checksums. This is expected. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-oracle (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid --

[Bug 1870092] Re: ftbfs in focal

2020-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
You rebuilt the package with a different compiler than what was used to compute the signatures/checksums in the kernel build, so you get different objects and mismatching checksums. This is expected. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-gcp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You

[Bug 1870090] Re: ftbfs in focal

2020-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
You rebuilt the package with a different compiler than what was used to compute the signatures/checksums in the kernel build, so you get different objects and mismatching checksums. This is expected. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-aws (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You

[Bug 1870091] Re: ftbfs in focal

2020-04-07 Thread Seth Forshee
You rebuilt the package with a different compiler than what was used to compute the signatures/checksums in the kernel build, so you get different objects and mismatching checksums. This is expected. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-azure (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid --

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-06 Thread Seth Forshee
Thanks for testing. I've applied the patches to focal/master-next. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-04-06 Thread Seth Forshee
Thanks for testing. I've applied the patches to focal/master-next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855668 Title: lockdown on power To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
New test build with the updated patch in the same ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855668 Title: lockdown on power To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Test build is done now, in the same location. It has the above patch and also the updated patch from bug 1855668. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title: Ubuntu Kernel Support

[Bug 1862760] Re: Unreliable 802.11ac connection on our raspi images

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Based on some quick googling, I think there's some localization set up on raspbian that must also cause it to set the regulatory domain. https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/configuration/wireless/desktop.md -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1862760] Re: Unreliable 802.11ac connection on our raspi images

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Generally speaking we don't know what country a device is operating in, so we default to the world domain which should be safe throughout the world. The AP may send a hint to the client as to what regulatory domain to use, but many APs do not do this. Also note that on many desktop systems now

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Oh but PPC_SECURE_BOOT depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY. For now I'm going to make it depend on that or LOCK_DOWN_IN_SECURE_BOOT to get the test build going. I think this makes sense because lockdown enforces signatures for module loading and kexec (plus a number of other restrictions), which I think is

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Um, off rather. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
I'll get a test kernel uploaded with IMA_ARCH_POLICY up, will let you know when it's ready for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title: Ubuntu Kernel Support for

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Afaict the ppc ima arch policy is about ensuring that signature verification is done for module loading and kexec, which in our kernel will be enforced by automatically turning on lockdown integrity mode under secure boot. So my conclusion is that CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE should stay off and

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
I'm suddenly having a major sense of deja vu about this. I think we hit very similar issues on x86, and after discussions with Mimi we decided that CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY should be disabled for us. I think this may be the right solution here too. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-03 Thread Seth Forshee
Our policy is to require module signatures only under lockdown. CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE requires modules to be signed unconditionally, which makes dkms impossible on systems which have no mechanism for importing keys from firmware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
This is noted on the other bug, but I'll also note it here. This kernel is *not* signed with the archive key. The public half of the key pair used to sign this build can be found in this tarball: http://ppa.launchpad.net/sforshee/lp1866909/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/signed

[Bug 1867588] Re: [SFC-0316]sync mainline kernel 5.7rc1 SFC patchset into ubuntu HWE kernel branch

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867588

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
Patch one is included on the test build for bug 1866909 in https://launchpad.net/~sforshee/+archive/ubuntu/lp1866909/+packages. I incorporated the config changes in with those requested for that bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
Build is done now, version 5.4.0-21.25+lp1866909v202004020814 in https://launchpad.net/~sforshee/+archive/ubuntu/lp1866909/+packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title:

[Bug 1867587] Re: [sas-0316]sync mainline kernel 5.6rc1 roce patchset into ubuntu HWE kernel branch

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867587 Title: [sas-0316]sync mainline kernel 5.6rc1 roce patchset into

[Bug 1869947] Re: Revert "nvme_fc: add module to ops template to allow module references"

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869947 Title: Revert "nvme_fc: add module to ops template to allow module

[Bug 1866909] Re: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER NV Secure & Trusted Boot

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Forshee
Note that it is still building, should be ready in a few hours. I'll post an update when it is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866909 Title: Ubuntu Kernel Support for OpenPOWER

[Bug 1856900] Re: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12

2020-03-31 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856900 Title: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux

[Bug 1856900] Re: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12

2020-03-31 Thread Seth Forshee
I don't see that the sysinfo stressor runs at all in the logs for 5.4.0-21: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/l/linux/20200331_002447_e28f4@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-30 Thread Seth Forshee
@knossos456 thanks, the fix release status though is for when the package has been released. I've added the verification-done-eoan tag. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-30 Thread Seth Forshee
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:06:16PM -, knossos456 wrote: > To do this i need a eoan iso with embedded proposed package -> to build a usb > boot stick. So I can test on my hardware. I haven't room on my HDD sorry. > Did you know where i can find this?

[Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-30 Thread Seth Forshee
Also no one has verified the -proposed package on eoan yet. Is anyone affected running eoan and able to verify the fix there? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865130 Title:

Re: [Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-30 Thread Seth Forshee
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 06:35:08AM -, knossos456 wrote: > Question to maintainer : > 1.173.17 proposed (main) > When will this release go to real updates, 7 days are gone. We generally don't release SRU updates over weekends (including Friday), so it will probably get released today.

[Bug 1865359] Re: sysfs: incorrect network device permissions on network namespace change

2020-03-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Applied the patches from linux-next, plus one additional fix I saw, "sysfs: fix static inline declaration of sysfs_groups_change_owner()". @Christian, please let me know if there are any other fixes we need to grab. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

[Bug 1865359] Re: sysfs: incorrect network device permissions on network namespace change

2020-03-27 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-03-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Also I'll add, you can use this ppa to test the -proposed kernels without enabling all of -proposed. https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed/ These are kernels copied from the -proposed pocked, after we've built signed packages in -proposed. -- You received this

[Bug 1855668] Re: lockdown on power

2020-03-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Lockdown is enabled in focal, and the default mode when booted without any secure boot scheme is NONE. When booted under a secure boot scheme, we had previously forced the CONFIDENTIALITY mode for lockdown. But we have now scaled that back, and the kernel in focal-proposed sets the mode to

[Bug 1869364] [NEW] glibc pwd/test-getpw test failures in autopkgtest

2020-03-27 Thread Seth Forshee
Public bug reported: I started seeing this in the testing for 5.4.0-20. Only happening on arm64/armhf. -- FAIL: pwd/tst-getpw original exit status 223 PASS: NULL buffer returns -1 and sets errno to EINVAL. PASS: Read a password line given a uid. FAIL: Did not find even one invalid uid.

[Bug 1866882] Re: segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390

2020-03-25 Thread Seth Forshee
Still seeing this with the current focal-proposed kernel: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/l/linux/20200325_012616_7d5a5@/log.gz ** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-10 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete =>

[Bug 1861521] Re: [FOCAL][REGRESSION] Intel Gen 9 brightness cannot be controlled

2020-03-25 Thread Seth Forshee
** Package changed: linux-5.4 (Ubuntu Focal) => linux (Ubuntu Focal) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1860697] Re: Sound doesn't work on Lenovo X1 Carbon 7th with 20.04

2020-03-23 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860697 Title: Sound doesn't work on Lenovo X1 Carbon 7th with 20.04 To manage

[Bug 1861053] Re: no fatrace output in focal

2020-03-23 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861053 Title: no fatrace output in focal To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1865836] Re: Touchscreen Unresponsive in Focal, but Works in Eoan

2020-03-23 Thread Seth Forshee
The focal-proposed kernel is now released, so marking this bug fix released. ** Package changed: linux-5.4 (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1863951] Re: [linux-azure] Missing user mode io driver - uio_pci_generic

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863951 Title: [linux-azure] Missing user mode io driver -

[Bug 1868217] Re: Make Dell WD19 dock more reliable after suspend

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868217 Title: Make Dell WD19 dock more reliable after suspend To

[Bug 1864484] Re: Update SmartPQI driver in Focal to 1.2.10-025

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864484 Title: Update SmartPQI driver in Focal to 1.2.10-025 To manage

[Bug 1836030] Re: enable realtek ethernet device ASPM function

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836030 Title: enable realtek ethernet device ASPM function To manage

[Bug 1867790] Re: update-version-dkms doesn't add a BugLink

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867790 Title: update-version-dkms doesn't add a BugLink To manage

[Bug 1864442] Re: dmaengine: hisilicon: Add Kunpeng DMA engine support

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04 Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864442 Title: dmaengine: hisilicon: Add Kunpeng DMA engine support

[Bug 1780590] Re: Add support for Realtek 8723DE wireless adapter

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780590 Title: Add support for Realtek 8723DE wireless adapter To manage

[Bug 1835531] Re: [20.04 FEAT] Base KVM setup for secure guests - kernel part

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Patches applied for focal. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835531 Title: [20.04 FEAT] Base KVM setup for secure

[Bug 1867656] Re: Remove linux-firmware dependency from kernel meta packages for s390x

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867656 Title: Remove linux-firmware dependency from kernel meta

[Bug 1867753] Re: [Ubuntu 20.04] Unset HIBERNATION and PM kernel config options for focal

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
Config changes applied for focal. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867753 Title: [Ubuntu 20.04] Unset

[Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-20 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865130 Title: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!! To

[Bug 1860697] Re: Sound doesn't work on Lenovo X1 Carbon 7th with 20.04

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
This should be fixed in focal now. I've uploaded packages for bionic and eoan too, those are waiting to be approved and built. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860697 Title: Sound

[Bug 1867753] Re: [Ubuntu 20.04] Unset HIBERNATION and PM kernel config options for focal

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
Let me just double check with you about disabling CONFIG_PM, as it also supports runtime power management of devices. If CONFIG_PM is disabled devices will not be put into low power states when idle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1866484] Re: focal/linux-azure: 5.4.0-1006.6 -proposed tracker

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866484 Title: focal/linux-azure: 5.4.0-1006.6 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1867656] Re: The need for the linux-firmware package on s390x

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
** Package changed: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) => linux-meta (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - The need for the linux-firmware package on s390x + Remove

[Bug 1862028] Re: Focal uses the exfat fuse filesystem even though there is support in the kernel

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
@laney: Shouldn't udisks2 prefer in-kernel filesystem support if available, then fallback to a fuse driver? We also have a fuseext2 package, but if I have that installed I would still expect an ext2 formatted thumb drive to be mounted using the kernel's driver when I insert it rather than the fuse

[Bug 1865130] Re: [drm:uvd_v1_0_start [radeon]] *ERROR* UVD not responding, trying to reset the VCPU!!!

2020-03-19 Thread Seth Forshee
Yes, sorry, I was blocked from uploading new linux-firmware packages for various reasons. All of the blocking issues are cleared up now, so I will upload new packages today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1866483] Re: focal/linux-aws: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker

2020-03-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866483 Title: focal/linux-aws: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1866486] Re: focal/linux-kvm: 5.4.0-1004.4 -proposed tracker

2020-03-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866486 Title: focal/linux-kvm: 5.4.0-1004.4 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1866485] Re: focal/linux-gcp: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker

2020-03-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866485 Title: focal/linux-gcp: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1866487] Re: focal/linux-oracle: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker

2020-03-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Tags added: regression-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866487 Title: focal/linux-oracle: 5.4.0-1005.5 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1866484] Re: focal/linux-azure: 5.4.0-1006.6 -proposed tracker

2020-03-13 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/promote-to-proposed Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Seth Forshee (sforshee) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866

[Bug 1857409] Re: alsa/sof: load different firmware on different platforms

2020-03-12 Thread Seth Forshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857409 Title: alsa/sof: load different firmware on different platforms

[Bug 1866882] Re: segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390

2020-03-12 Thread Seth Forshee
Added reproduction steps to the description. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866882 Title: segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390 To manage notifications

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >