[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2014-01-02 Thread Dave Johansen
I no longer have access to this hardware to get the full computer model, but the referenced test programs should be able to reproduce the issue on most, if not all machines (it's worked on everyone I've tried it on to date). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2014-01-02 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Low ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058864 Title: Poor

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2014-01-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Dave Johansen, could you please provide the full computer model as noted on the sticker (ex. HP Pavilion dm4-2015dx Entertainment Notebook PC)? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-10-11 Thread Dave Johansen
As another data point, I loaded the Ubuntu 8.04-4 x86 LiveCD and rebuilt the executable and ran the test. I then ran the same executable on the Ubuntu 7.10 x86 LiveCD and the Ubuntu 12.04 x64 Install (after installing ia32-libs) and here are the results. I chose those release because those were

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-10-04 Thread Dave Johansen
I installed the kernel with the BFS scheduler from https://launchpad.net/~chogydan/+archive/ppa and ran the test. It appears that the the two schedulers count user/system time differently, but over all it appears that BFS is slightly better than CFS in this test, but doesn't show any significant

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-10-02 Thread Dave Johansen
I'm running 12.04 so I gave the 3.4 kernel a try ( http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.4-precise/ ). It appears that the performance is about the same, if not worse, with 3.4. Here are the results: mutex 1 thread real 0m 0.515s user 0m 0.508s sys 0m 0.004s 2 threads real 0m 4.305s

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-10-02 Thread Dave Johansen
I also ran it with the 3.6 kernel ( http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.6-quantal/ ) and just like with 3.4, the performance is about the same, if not worse. Here are the results: mutex 1 thread real 0m 0.545s user 0m 0.520s sys 0m 0.000s 2 threads real 0m 3.550s user 0m 3.636s

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-10-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v3.6 kernel[0] (Not a kernel in the daily directory) and install both the linux-image and linux-image-extra .deb packages. Once you've tested the

[Bug 1058864] Re: Poor mutex and semaphore performance

2012-09-29 Thread Dave Johansen
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise running-unity staging ** Description changed: I noticed the results of this blog post: http://mr-edd.co.uk/blog/sad_state_of_osx_pthread_mutex_t and I was curious if the same sort of issue existed with the linux kernel and if it