[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-05-20 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
xcasex, if you have a bug in Ubuntu, the Ubuntu Kernel team, Ubuntu Bug Control team, and Ubuntu Bug Squad would like you to please file a new report by executing the following in a terminal: ubuntu-bug linux For more on this, please see the Ubuntu Kernel team article:

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-05-19 Thread xcasex
Confirmed on Raring. additional information as per Markus Schade above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null);

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-04-05 Thread Markus Schade
This depends on the definition of fixed. Booting with nomodeset still leads to the originally reported call trace, even in 3.5.0-26-generic #42. So, the workaround is either to blacklist i915 or to add something like video=1024x768 to the kernel options in order to get a resolution that is not

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-03-13 Thread Timo Aaltonen
assuming this is fixed in raring as well. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-01-05 Thread Dave Gilbert
Tim: Apologies, I didn't notice your comment #62 The oops was in dmesg, as reported in bug 1077658 and as I said in #61 the was fixed in -19 for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-01-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Tim, did you file the bug upstream as Daniel requested? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Assignee: (unassigned) = Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2013-01-04 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Marking Invalid for Quantal as per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070690/comments/62 . ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-12-04 Thread Markus Schade
Well, the small error message ( *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. DRM: Fill_in_dev failed.) when booting without 'nomodeset' is gone. But the oops is still present when booting with nomodeset. But since upstream says that nomodeset is not really supported, I can only assume that only

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-12-03 Thread Tim Meusel
Dear Dave, for Markus and me the oops was fixed in 3.5.0-18. I haven't seen your intel(0)... messages on my test systems, where did you get them? dmesg? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-12-01 Thread Dave Gilbert
I think there are really two separate bugs going on here; 1) For some reason the Intel chipset doesn't like something and gives up 2) When it cleans up from (1) it panics It looks to me like 3.5.0-19-generic has fixed the panic on my box; although I still get a black screen - but that looks

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-27 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Tags removed: performing-bisect -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[8167f93a]

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-26 Thread Tim Meusel
My and Daniels email about this problem: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel- gfx/2012-November/022707.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-26 Thread Tim Meusel
I talked to Daniel Vetter, he is responsible for the i915 driver and works for Intel. He told me that this chipset series doesn't support the parameter nomodeset. So this bug report can be closed now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-26 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Tim Meusel, thank you for investigating this further. Regarding your comments https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070690/comments/57 : He told me that this chipset series doesn't support the parameter nomodeset. He did not say it's not supported. What he said was: Well, you're

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-26 Thread Tim Meusel
Dear Christopher, Daniel wrote to me in a personal email usermodesetting was _never_ supported on these machines. (talking about Ivy Bridge chipsets). As written by Markus in the initial post, we had an OOPS/Kernel Panic with the i915 driver and the first official Ubuntu 12.10 driver

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-22 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags removed: kernel-unable-to-test-upstream kernel-unable-to-test-upstream-v3.7-rc2-raring ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream kernel-bug-exists-upstream-3.7-rc6 kernel-unable-to-test-upstream-v3.7-rc2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-21 Thread Tim Meusel
FYI: the error is still present in the newest 3.7-rc6 mainline release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null);

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-15 Thread Tim Meusel
Hi, my previous posts were not accurate enough, sorry for that. To clarify some facts: The Raring Kernel 3.7.0-0.5 and the newer one from last night 3.7.0-1.7 are as buggy as the real quantal kernel. Their dmesg output is the same as mentioned in my comment #42. Also as written in post #49,

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-14 Thread Karma Dorje
** Also affects: bumblebee Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null);

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-14 Thread Karma Dorje
https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/277 ** Also affects: bumblebee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Incomplete = New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-14 Thread Karma Dorje
Christopher M. Penalver (penalvch) I do not share your views, so do not try to do anything without explanation. we do not believe in an unknown fucking garbage. therefore, you have no right to label something there just based on your philosophy. p.s. and, last but not least. I never see your

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-14 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Karma Dorje, to maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct . Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in mind. As well, please do not add bumblebee (Ubuntu) tasks as

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-14 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Markus Meusel, thank you for your comments. Regarding them https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070690/comments/48 : Christopher, please read Tim's post #39. I re-reviewed comment #39 and saw no mention of how either of you tested this issue in a Raring environment, whose Ubuntu

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Markus Schade, thank you for your comments. Regarding them https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070690/comments/45 : as Tim wrote, the upstream bug is fixed as of 3.7-rc5. Changed in linux (Ubuntu Raring): status: Incomplete → Fix Released The fact Tim said his issue is

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-13 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Fazlur, if you have a bug in Ubuntu, could you please file a new report by executing the following in a terminal: ubuntu-bug linux For more on this, please see the Ubuntu Kernel team article: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies#Filing_Kernel_Bug_reports the Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-13 Thread Markus Schade
Christopher, please read Tim's post #39. He is testing the platform with me. We are working on the issue together. So the bug is indeed fixed for Raring. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-13 Thread Tim Meusel
I justed tested several other raring Kernel: 3.6.4-030604-generic 3.6.6-030606-generic 3.7.0-030700rc1-generic 3.7.0-030700rc2-generic 3.7.0-030700rc3-generic 3.7.0-030700rc4-generic they are all working, dmesg output looks like the one posted in #42 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-12 Thread Tim Meusel
I tested the 3.7.0-030700rc5 #20120835 too, looks like it works without the kernelparameter nomodeset: [9.374325] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [9.429448] pci :00:00.0: Intel Ivybridge Chipset [9.429524] pci :00:00.0: detected gtt size: 2097152K total, 262144K

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-12 Thread Tim Meusel
** Attachment added: dmesg 3.7.0-030700rc5 without nomodeset https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1070690/+attachment/3431295/+files/dmesg_no_nomodeset -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-12 Thread Fazlur
I am facing the same issue on 3.5.0-18 on Ubuntu 12.10 (64-bit) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP:

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-12 Thread Markus Schade
as Tim wrote, the upstream bug is fixed as of 3.7-rc5. So the only thing that needs to be resolved is the actual quantal bug. As we have tested the mainstream kernels up to 3.5.7, could you please post the pre- release quantal kernels that we should test? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring)

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-11 Thread Dave Gilbert
I've just reported bug 1077658 which looks like it might be the same as this. This only happens for me if I plug in via a KVM switch, not direclty in via a monitor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-11 Thread Dave Gilbert
3.7.0-030700rc5 #20120835 from the nightlies works for me (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.7-rc5-raring/ although I'm on a quantal userspace) So I say that makes it a fixed upstream 3.6.3-030603 #201210211349 boots but won't start X (but ctrl-alt-f1 gets me a console)

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-07 Thread Tim Meusel
@Joseph I tested together with Markus 3.5.0-16.25 and several older ones, all are working. In 3.5.0-17.26 were some drm/i915 related things added. Booting the 17.26 prints the following at boot: * Starting load fallback graphics devices [fail] the curious thing

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-06 Thread Markus Schade
Upstream is already aware of the issue, see http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1418335.html So the only thing that needs to be determined, is which quantal patch to the 3.5 mainline has introduced the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-06 Thread Markus Schade
As outlined in the message the bug is triggered by adding the nomodeset option to the kernel command line which seems to enable a different code path. So booting without nomodeset is fine, but I don't need KMS on a server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-06 Thread Joseph Salisbury
@Markus, Comment #27 lists some kernel version prior to The final 12.10 kernel. Did you not see this bug in any of those listed kernels? If that is the case, I will post some additional kernels to test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-03 Thread Florent Mertens
PLease Christopher, could you tell us what is missing to this bug ? For what I can see this bug was introduced between 3.5.0-18-generic and 3.5.0-17-generic, and looking at the changelog, there is a bunch of i915 changes there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-02 Thread Florent Mertens
Christpher, I don't see any reason to open a new bug, this is the exact same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-01 Thread Florent Mertens
I also encounter this issue on my dell xps 15. This bug happens for me with kernel 3.5.0-18-generic, but not with 3.5.0-17-generic. When booting with 3.5.0-18-generic, driver initialization fail, and X fallback to using the vesa driver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-11-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Florent Mertens, if you have a bug in Ubuntu, could you please file a new report by executing the following in a terminal: ubuntu-bug linux For more on this, please see the Ubuntu Bug Control and Ubuntu Bug Squad article:

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-25 Thread Markus Schade
I am a bit puzzled. I have tested up to 3.5.7 including the mainline 3.5.5, on which the quantal kernel is based, without encountering this error. But looking at the changelog I can't see anything related to drm or i915. Kernel 3.6.0 had the light version of the bug. [9.001003]

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-25 Thread Markus Schade
the light bug is already present in 3.6-rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP:

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-25 Thread Simon Jones
I've seen the same problem on my Dell M4700. However, it appears to fail intermittently. The last time I booted, the driver loaded without error, but the time before that it failed with the message below. 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070690 Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-25 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Simon Jones, if you have a bug in Ubuntu, could you please file a new report by executing the following in a terminal: ubuntu-bug linux For more on this, please see the Ubuntu Bug Control and Ubuntu Bug Squad article:

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-24 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Markus Schade, as this report is apport-collect'ed against your ivy bridge computer, please file a new report against your sandy bridge computer by executing the following in a terminal, and please feel free to subscribe me to it: ubuntu-bug linux Thank you for your understanding. Status

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-24 Thread Joseph Salisbury
This issue appears to be an upstream bug, since you tested the latest upstream kernel. Would it be possible for you to open an upstream bug report[0]? That will allow the upstream Developers to examine the issue, and may provide a quicker resolution to the bug. Please follow the instructions on

[Bug 1070690] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null); RIP: 0010:[ffffffff8167f93a] [ffffffff8167f93a] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xaa/0x150

2012-10-24 Thread Joseph Salisbury
In addition to opening an upstream bug, I'd like to perform a bisect to figure out what commit caused this regression. It would be very helpful to know the earliest kernel where the issue started happening as well as the latest kernel that did not have this issue. Can you test the following