[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2018-05-12 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: LaMont Jones (lamont) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-17 Thread MAAS Lander
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package bind9 - 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.12 --- bind9 (1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.12) trusty; urgency=medium * Backport (70_precise_mtime.diff) 18b87b2a58d422fe4d3073540bf89b5a812ed2e5 to trusty. LP: #1553176 -- LaMont Jones Fri, 03

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-07 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Also affects: maas/1.9 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: maas/1.9 Milestone: None => 1.9.5 ** Changed in: maas/1.9 Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/1.9

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Verified trusty using the same test as found in http://paste.ubuntu.com/23921176/ ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu Trusty) Milestone: None => trusty-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/bug-1553176-1.9 ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/bug-1553176-1.9-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello LaMont, or anyone else affected, Accepted bind9 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg- 3ubuntu0.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2017-02-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Description changed: Since 2.6, linux has supported nanosecond granular time in stat(2) returns. BIND has a comment in the code that it might use it, but continues to ignore it. As of 9.9.3b2, named checks the time of (at least) zone files on disk (expanding to include include

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-08-18 Thread Andres Rodriguez
** Changed in: maas Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-04-19 Thread LaMont Jones
The Ubuntu (and Debian) tree for BIND includes a patch in 9.10 that fixes this, and the bug has been filed upstream. ** Changed in: bind Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: bind Status: Fix

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in alpha2 ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.0.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in alpha2 ** Changed in: maas Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: maas Milestone: None => 2.0.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title:

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To manage

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553176 Title: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload To

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This also affects 9.9.5 in trusty and later. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => trusty-updates ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/packaging-bug-1553176 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-5 ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1553176] Re: BIND ignores nanoseconds field in timestamps, fails to load newer versions of zones on reload

2016-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
This also affects 9.9.5 in trusty and later. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => trusty-updates ** Branch linked: lp:~lamont/maas/packaging-bug-1553176 -- You received this bug notification because you are