** Changed in: serverguide
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Branch linked: lp:serverguide
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: serverguide
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Provided a suggestion for the serverguide to improve and soemwhat un-
tangle timedatectl/timesyncd/ntpd.
** Changed in: serverguide
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: serverguide
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
** Branch linked:
This bug was fixed in the package ntp - 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu1
---
ntp (1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu1) artful; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #1604010). Remaining changes:
- d/ntp.conf, d/ntpdate.default: Change default server to ntp.ubuntu.com.
- Add PPS
Added a serverguide task to clean up the the mentioned section.
Both should stay but split more clearly.
Also FYI the merge of latest ntp is on the way which will bring sntp back as it
should be for Artful and later.
It is part of a new package there - not sure if this qualifies as an SRU or if
Am affected by the missing sntp binary also.
For reference the Debian bug mentioned in comment #4 is
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793837.
Also note that the workaround mentioned in #15 does not (AFAICT from
https://github.com/ntp-project/ntp/blob/master/ntpdate/ntpdate.c)
We didn't want to diverge until Debian decided to either ship it or fully
remove it.
Now Debian release at least to experimental (but only there so far).
Given the low prio/impact this had overall so far, we will likely pick
it up in the merge for the aa-release and then consider SRUing it back.
** Changed in: ntp (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
workaround for ubuntu 16.04 lts is to install the deprecated ntpdate
that still works ok:
ntpdate:amd64/xenial-security 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.3 uptodate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ntp (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Project changed: ntp => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: ubuntu
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #793837 => None
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** Also affects: ntp (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793837
NTP.org discussion on the missing EX_* definitions ongoing in NTP bug 3096
=> http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3096
** Bug watch added: bugs.ntp.org/ #3096
http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3096
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@Sponsors - as written above, please unsubscribe yourself for now,
unfortunately I can't do that for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage
The attachment "experimental debdiff for discussion and as reference"
seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to
the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the
debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch"
flag from the
That is true @Markus Kuhn - I just wanted to mention it after testing
the debdiff I attached a bit as - severe or not - it is the first thing
that really meets the eye.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
General comment: I would not consider "Use of uninitialized value"
warnings in Perl on their own as evidence of a lack of software quality.
If a Perl programmer deliberately used the fact that undef also works as
an empty string, I would still consider that to be a perfectly
legitimate Perl
BTW - ntpsweep is not particularly stable or correct - so I don't know
how much of a "reason to need sntp" it is.
ntpsweep --host 0.debian.pool.ntp.org
Host st offset(s) version system processor
bugs.ntp.org is encountering internal server errors on bug submission,
I'll update once I was able to submit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage
Draft debdiff to enable and provide sntp in Yakkety.
For now only meant as reference - please do not upload yet.
If there is a autosubscribe of sponsors please due to this being a patch please
ubsubscribe for now.
It has to changes to internal libopts and thereby drops the libopts25 runtime
Just dropping the --with-sntp=no would have been too easy (thanks Murphy).
It runs into build issues.
I was able to track those down to one of the build deps in combination
with no more disabling sntp causing this => autogen.
But then removing autogen build dep is not a "solution" - especially
** Changed in: ntp
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I was building upstream ntp as-is having --with-sntp=no as debian/rules does.
And just as I assumed, the old 4.2.6 build "ignored" the "--with-sntp=no" and
built it anyway.
While the new one follows the order.
This was changed way back in:
commit dd3be096e78eb8d13da36caad215c9f5c009b11a
Author:
Interestingly it was configured and build with "--with-sntp=no" all the
time back as far as history goes.
Since 4.2.8 ntp brings their own manpage, so the sntp manpage patch got
dropped.
As I identified Debian being affected as well I searched there and found
the reason it was disabled to begin
Hi,
I took a look as I recently hacked on ntp packaging.
I can confirm the issue and also that it affects Debian as well.
I'll dig a bit where/why it came from and then update accordingly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
** Tags removed: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => ChristianEhrhardt (paelzer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604010
Title:
sntp missing
To manage notifications about this
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Confirmed that the manpage is present but the binary is missing. This
needs further investigation (as to whether there is some logic to this
or it is just a mistake).
** Tags added: server-next
--
You received
sntp is not just a useful tool, it is essential for ntpsweep (included
in the ntp pacakge).
> ntpsweep --host 0.ubuntu.pool.ntp.org
Host st offset(s) version system processor
+--+-+---++-
31 matches
Mail list logo
