** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
This bug was fixed in the package percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 -
5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu1.1
---
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu1.1) zesty; urgency=high
[ Jorge Niedbalski ]
* d/p/ibuf-uses-full-memory-barrier-powerpc.patch: This patch implements
a full memory
This bug was fixed in the package percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 -
5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
---
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu0.16.04.2) xenial; urgency=high
* d/p/ibuf-uses-full-memory-barrier-powerpc.patch: This patch implements
a full memory barrier for
## FOR SRU VERIFICATION TEAM ##
After some investigation and more testing from my part, I confirm the 4
autopkgtest failures for Zesty[1] release are unrelated to the current
percona SRU, and is a separate issue specifically in diaspora-installer
pkg. I have reported a bug about it[2].
[1] -
Note: Xenial would be good already in regard to verification (done), as
well as autopkgtests (all good)
On Zesty:
- arm64 / ppc64 essentially always failed - pcp is detected as such, arm was
never executed before
"configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one"
- on
This bug was fixed in the package percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 -
5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.5
---
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.5) trusty;
urgency=medium
[ Mario Splivalo ]
* d/p/fix-power8-crash-under-load.patch: Create proper barriers at
The autopkgtest still fails after an attempt to restart them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
I have identified 4 autopkgtests failure for Zesty in pending-sru page
as follow :
[autopkgtest failures]
#https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
Regression in autopkgtest for diaspora-installer (i386): test log
Regression in autopkgtest for diaspora-installer (s390x): test
By precaution, I have restarted the autopkgtest for the above 4
failures.
Let's see the outcome.
- Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a
Hello Brian,
I've performed a validation on top of amd64[0] and ppc64el[1] reproducing
the test steps described here. The verification seems successful in both
platforms.
[0] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25960515/
[1] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25960518/
** Tags removed: verification-needed
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 into trusty-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Summary of the verification:
* Xenial has been verified on the following scenarios:
** OpenStack cloud on amd64 with tempest with 1 node and 3 nodes cluster
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/+bug/1657256/comments/83)
** ppc64 through sysbench on a single
OK - look liks arm64/amd64 are covered, but it seems to me that we still
need test results for xenial-proposed and zesty-proposed on ppc64el.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
The regression test failures above were config issues on my end. They've
since passed successfully.
I also ran tempest regression successfully with 3 units of percona in an
HA configuration with corosync, pacemaker and haproxy.
Note: all the regression tests I've run are amd64.
Regression test
@Jorge what else needs to be tested before this can get a verified tag?
Note: I've tested on arm64, though I was never able to recreate the problem
myself w/ the unfixed package and percona.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Verified proposed Xenial with HA in 3 units
(http://paste.ubuntu.com/25903553/)
Tempest results, 10 failed tests, unlikely to be related to this change.
http://paste.ubuntu.com/25903540/
Juju status:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/25903545/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Regression testing for xenial-mitaka-proposed is hitting 2 heat test
failures due to authorization failures. I've not yet dug into them but
they exist on xenial-proposed and xenial-updates so likely not an issue
related to this bug.
==
Totals
Regression test results for zesty-ocata-proposed with stable charms was
successful:
==
Totals
==
Ran: 102 tests in 1559.9808 sec.
- Passed: 93
- Skipped: 9
- Expected Fail: 0
- Unexpected Success: 0
- Failed: 0
Sum of execute time for each test: 878.9997 sec.
Regression test results
Manoj, can you please verify the package in Proposed by enabling the
proposed repo and tag this bug as verification-done-xenial ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 into zesty-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and
then in the -proposed repository.
Please help
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 into xenial-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Percona will segfault when exposed to medium load, almost imediately
- * This is because of a bug in upstream, which manifests only on PPC
+ * This is because of a bug in upstream, which manifests on ARM and PPC
[Test Case]
* Install and
Ok, then we have
- code review and fixups done
- Fixed in latest Dev release
- SRU Template ready
- Tested build from PPAs
- Tested fix from PPAs
=> I'm merging the MPs and sponsoring the fix now for SRU.
I see it in the -unapproved queues - from now on it is up to the SRU
Team.
@Jorge - Please
@paelzer,
Thanks for providing a PPA.
I've verified your PPA for Zesty [0] Xenial [1] and Trusty[2] on ppc64el and
the problem isn't longer reproduced.
[0] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25825884/
[1] https://pastebin.com/raw/QpQScU7r
[2] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25825856/
--
You received this
After a few rounds of cleanup we made it.
There was enough cleanup to be worth a retest - other than that we are ready
IMO.
@Jorge - could you do a final run on the T/X/Z builds in [1] to be sure
before I sponsor.
[1]: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3005
--
You
** Merge proposal unlinked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332840
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332840
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@paelzer,
- For the Trusty build failure I've submitted a MP on top of your branch , that
proposal is intended to fix the FTBFS problem on ppc64 [0],
there is PPA[1] for testing it. I'd appreciate if you can review it and merge
if appropriate.
- I am currently investigating the origin of the Z
FYI:
- Done reviewing branches in general
- Niedbalski and I fixed several things already (whitespace, versions, correct
author attribution, rebase to correct base versions, ...)
- X branch looks good and builds/tests fine
- T branch FTBFS on all !x86 in [1]
- Z branch FTBFS on all !x86 in [1]
** Branch linked: lp:~niedbalski/ubuntu/trusty/percona-xtradb-
cluster-5.5/fix-lp1657256
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
** Merge proposal unlinked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332515
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: Mario Splivalo (mariosplivalo) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Zesty)
Assignee: Mario Splivalo (mariosplivalo) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
** Changed in:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332623
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332617
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi,
I reviewed the MP and it LGTM.
Also I'm ok with the debdiff for trusty given that it was already reviewed
before.
The one thing missing is to also fix it in zesty.
Just as much as in Artful the point is to avoid users regressing when upgrading.
So the usual rule of thumb is:
1. current
Hello @paelzer,
I linked the MP with the proposal against ubuntu/xenial for your review and
validation.
Thanks.
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Hello @paelzer,
I reviewed/tested the SRU made by Mario earlier on this bug and considering
that the devel series has the fix included already, I think there is no
other blocker to proceed with the Trusty SRU.
I am re-attaching the debdiff for your review.
Thanks.
** Patch added:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~niedbalski/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332515
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Mario Splivalo (mariosplivalo) =>
This bug was fixed in the package percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 -
5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu4
---
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu4) artful; urgency=high
[ Jorge Niedbalski ]
* Fix FTBFS with gcc7 (LP: #1714554)
- d/p/ibuf-uses-full-memory-barrier-ppc64.patch: Modified
FYI - further work on the FTBFS on bug 1714554 (the one about the FTBFS)
- if/once this gets in it will unblock this bug here as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Christian, Robbie:
Thanks for taking the time to review the patch that I've submitted. I think that
the latest patch that Christian worked on covers and clean most of the
observations made by Robbie
earlier in the bug and I can confirm that it doesn't modifies the original
patch with any
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+git/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+merge/332357
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: charm-test-infra
Importance: High => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about
I was asked to help with the review and on a first glimpse agree with
Robie c#62.
TL;DR:
1. munching various changes together makes it hard to review
2. several changes are not clear why they were added to the debdiff
2. We are in Final Freeze already, so SRU Rules apply -> lets fix the FTBFS and
Jorge: When I installed it manually, the openstack cluster came up fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage
I found this quite complicated to review, so to break it down I imported
the package into git and then split your debdiff up into multiple git
commits and then applied the relevant quilt patches as commits at the
end so that I could see what was going on. I've pushed this to
Jorge: The latest did not install (I am using a juju charm bundle to
deploy openstack):
2017-10-08 15:41:09 DEBUG install WARNING: The following packages cannot be
authenticated!
2017-10-08 15:41:09 DEBUG install percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.6
2017-10-08 15:41:09 DEBUG install E: There were
I've built a Xenial PPA with the fix (ppa:niedbalski/xenial-lp1657256)
for testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To
rbasak, ok, I don't think is going to be possible, I
incorporated a small nitpick on the original patch (that prevents a
warning), thus the ibuf* patch actually differs from ubuntu3.
niedbalski: if you want to update what you did in ubuntu3, that's fine.
Just include it in ubuntu4 and bullet
21:57 niedbalski: thanks! Quick glance. 5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu3
is already taken. Can you prepare a debdiff against the already uploaded
5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu3 to 5.6.34-26.19-0ubuntu4? I expect that debdiff to
include only the FTBFS fix, as I think the other necessary fixes are
already present in
Hello Robie,
>3. To fix this in the development release, I suggested a minimal distro
patch that stops warning->error for non-bugs is OK to fix this and
suggested that you could look at a recent and similar fix >in squid3 for
an example[2].
The definitive fix for all the warnings (>10k)
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors for now as I have declined the current
debdiff for artful and so there is nothing left to sponsor.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
There seems to be a ton of confusion here. I have commented to various
people on IRC as they have asked me. But the messages don't seem to have
been received. I'll try and summarize my opinion here.
0. I asked for a link to document upstream's rejection of this patch in
comment 33 and on IRC[1].
The existing PPA does not work on ppc64/xenial because of the libevent
dependancy? Can we get that resolved?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing
@racb,
Could you please do a 2nd review of Jorge's newest debdiff attached in
comment #38.
Thanks in advance
- Eric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes
I hope not Jason. I am running into the same issue on Xenial:
2017-09-27 21:48:07 DEBUG install percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.6 : Depends:
libevent-2.1-6 (>= 2.1.8-stable) but it is not installable
2017-09-27 21:48:07 DEBUG install E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
broken packages.
Jorge,
I tied this install now on Xenial, but am getting the same error about libevent
being not installable:
2017-09-28 23:08:14 INFO install Some packages could not be installed. This may
mean that you have
2017-09-28 23:08:14 INFO install requested an impossible situation or if you
are
@Manoj, https://launchpad.net/~niedbalski/+archive/ubuntu/lp1657256/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage
Can you build a PPA for Xenial?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
fyi, looks like the same issue we fixed in MySQL/MariaDB a couple years
ago - LP: #1427406
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger'
** No longer affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Yakkety)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage
** No longer affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Artful)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
Hey Jorge,
I applied the updated deb last night to openstack env, mysql did not
crash overnight and I was able to get 10+ sysbench runs on my test
machine without a crash. I'll keep sysbench running throughout the day
to ensure the crash does not occur again.
looks ok so far.
--
You received
Sorry, xenial is what I need.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Which series? the PPA just covers artful. fyi,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about this bug go
I tried this on ppc64el and see this issue:
2017-09-21 20:07:06 DEBUG install Some packages could not be installed. This
may mean that you have
2017-09-21 20:07:06 DEBUG install requested an impossible situation or if you
are using the unstable
2017-09-21 20:07:06 DEBUG install distribution
Hey Jorge,
I need a build for arm64, i only see the pkg available for Builds
[FULLYBUILT] amd64
[FULLYBUILT] ppc64el
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes
Hello Sean,
I built a PPA here https://launchpad.net/~niedbalski/+archive/ubuntu/lp1657256/
for
ppc64el with the fix applied. Could you please check if your tests passes with
this PPA?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: "errorlog-while-running-sysbench.arm64.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-test-infra/+bug/1657256/+attachment/4954497/+files/errorlog-while-running-sysbench.arm64.txt
** Tags added: arm64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Deploying Openstack Ocata, w/ Juju on arm64 hosts, the mysql crashed
with the following:
2017-09-20 21:38:39 17783 [Warning] 'user' entry 'root@juju-24a047-0-lxd-1'
ignored in --skip-name-resolve mode.
2017-09-20 21:38:39 17783 [Warning] 'user' entry '@juju-24a047-0-lxd-1' ignored
in
** Also affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Artful)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
Status: In
See possibly dup bug @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713778
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
** Patch added: "lp1657256.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/+bug/1657256/+attachment/4948159/+files/lp1657256.debdiff
** Patch removed: "lp1657256-artful.debdiff"
Hello Beisner,
I built a PPA here https://launchpad.net/~niedbalski/+archive/ubuntu/lp1657256/
for
ppc64el with the fix applied. Could you please check if your tests passes with
this PPA?
Thanks.
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
Hey Ryan,
Yes .. after the latest update of gcc to 7.2, the package (with and
without the proposed patch applied) fails to build. Any subsequent
rebuild of percona on the archive will fail to build.
I created another bug for fixing the build
Hi Ryan,
The package has been sponsored by Robie but didn't successfully build[1]
due to a certain recent bump on the gcc version from what I heard.
Jorge and Robie will probably know more about the details and the next
step.
[1] - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-
This is impacting >= Xenial ppc64el deployments and testing for
OpenStack Charms. Please let us know if there is a PPA with the fixed
package available. Thank you.
** Tags added: ppc64el uosci
** Also affects: charm-test-infra
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
Thanks! Sponsored because I appreciate the delay already. But please
file a bug with Percona upstream and link to it here. Then hopefully on
future updates we can drop the patch. Otherwise we'll slowly build up
patches to this package over time and it'll become an unmaintainable
mess.
--
You
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hello Sponsors,
Attached you can find a debdiff for the artful series which fixes the issue
expressed
on this bug for powerpc architecture.
The patch cover multiple commits from upstream MariaDB,
* Commit 6ea41f1e84eb6b864cac17ad0b862bde9820dc33: Implements
the
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mario Splivalo (mariosplivalo) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
** Changed in: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mario Splivalo
** Tags removed: sts-sru-done
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
As per previous discussion on IRC and other places, I have removed the
update from trusty-proposed to unblock other fixes to the package. The
reason being: SRU postponed until the bug gets fixed in 5.6 versions of
the package in the current devel series.
Feel free to re-upload the fix once at
Hi, Brian, Łukasz.
I understand; the main reasoning for splitting up the SRU work is so
that trusty version can be released to trusty-updates sooner so that end
users can start using it.
But, I understand the implications of splitting the SRU - I will
continue my work on fixing xenial-and-above,
** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage
** Also affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
"I have removed percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 from this bug as in Trusty we
have percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5, and in xenial (and above) we have
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6. I've created a separate bug for Percona in
xenial (and above): #1693765."
Given that percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.6 replaces
It seems I made a mistake by publishing this to -proposed, not sure what
happened in my head. This needs to be released *first* to the devel
series *at least*. I request this being blocked in the -proposed pocket
until all other series don't at least get released to artful (so bug LP:
#1693765).
I have also tested the package under Intel architectures to make sure no
regression is introduced and, indeed, the sysbench test completes
without an error.
Also, there is failed buidl for powerpc architecture, but this was not
introduced by this change - one can check that this has been like
I have verified the package from -proposed, and it indeed fixes the bug.
I first deployed percona-xtradb-cluster-server from trusty-updates:
root@mario-trusty-percona-sru-verification:~# apt-cache policy
percona-xtradb-cluster-server
percona-xtradb-cluster-server:
Installed:
Hello Mario, or anyone else affected,
Accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 into trusty-proposed. The package
will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
** Patch added:
"trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/+bug/1657256/+attachment/4885589/+files/trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff
--
You
** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications
** Patch removed:
"trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/+bug/1657256/+attachment/4884178/+files/trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff
--
You
** Patch added:
"trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5/+bug/1657256/+attachment/4884178/+files/trusty-percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5_5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.debdiff
** Patch
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Percona will segfault when exposed to medium load, almost imediately
* This is because of a bug in upstream, which manifests only on PPC
[Test Case]
* Install and configure percona-xtradb-cluster-server
* Run sysbench against configured
I have removed percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 from this bug as in Trusty we
have percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5, and in xenial (and above) we have
percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6. I've created a separate bug for Percona in
xenial (and above): #1693765.
The reason for separation is to speed up SRU for Trusty
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
Title:
Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
