I have "reopened" this bug as:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1718897 , as it
still fails for me (a month later).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702056
Title:
This is resolved now.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702056
Title:
perf broken on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful):
please use -proposed on your own risk. it's the area where packages
stabilize. The kernel should always build with the proposed pocket
enabled.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Same problem with the new 4.11.0-12 upload, i'm assuming since binutils
is still in -proposed it wasn't built against?
linux-tools-4.11.0-12 : Depends: binutils (< 2.29) but 2.29-2ubuntu1 is
to be installed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
New binutils upload today of 2.29, which conflicts with linux-tools as
it turns out it Depends binutils (>= 2.28), binutils (<< 2.29)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702056
Title:
I rebuilt both binutils and linux-4.11.0-11 locally to see if anything
changed.
binutils still has the same libbfd-2.28.90-system.20170718.so soname in
the package
however perf in linux-tools is now linked against the new soname. So a
rebuild may solve it however I am not entirely sure if this
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702056
Title:
perf broken on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful): /usr/lib/linux-
Doing a quick google, it seems third party binaries can get linked
against this shared library as well possibly. Ran apport-collect for
the extra logs; and both today's binutils and kernel upgrade haven't
fixed it.
Thinking we might need to propose for affecting binutils?
** Also affects:
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
I am unable to launch perf on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful) running on
artful-proposed
/usr/lib/linux-tools/4.11.0-9-generic/perf: error while loading shared
libraries: libbfd-2.28-system.so: cannot open shared
There seems to be a missing symlink in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
cd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
sudo ln -s libbfd-2.28.51-system.20170627.so libbfd-2.28-system.so
and that allows perf to run
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I've got the same issue too with artful
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
lathiat@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy binutils
binutils:
Installed: 2.28.51.20170627-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.28.51.20170627-1ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.28.51.20170627-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://mirror.tcc.wa.edu.au/ubuntu artful-proposed/main amd64
Packages
100
12 matches
Mail list logo