[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
In case anyone here wants to try the proposed solution, I did upload corosync version 3.0.3-2ubuntu2.2~ppa1 to my PPA and it indeed fixes the issue, it uses the hostname as the node name by default now: https://launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/+archive/ubuntu/ha-stack I'll be working to release

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-16 Thread James Page
Hi Lucas Thanks for the commentary and feedback on why this change was introduced. I feel this is worth looking at via the SRU process and yes please if you have cycles that would be great! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-10 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
This is a change in the default corosync config file (/etc/corosync/corosync.conf), it impacts pacemaker clusters but it is not directly related to pacemaker. The change was made in Debian here: https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/corosync/-/commit/2f8aa88 Between corosync version 2.4.3 (present in

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-10 Thread James Page
Setting the pacemaker distro task back to new - it seems very odd that a system designed to manage a cluster of servers would install on every node with a non-unique node id, which is a change in behaviour from older versions of the same software. Can we not sanity fix this to use the hostname,

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-09 Thread James Page
** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874719 Title: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node To manage notifications

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-09 Thread Felipe Reyes
** Tags added: seg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874719 Title: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-06-09 Thread Aurelien Lourot
Raising priority to "High" because this may lead to corosync/pacemaker thinking there are 4 nodes instead of 3 on a fresh deployment, and then we think we have an HA deployment where we are in fact not HA. Again there is a workaround: running the `update-ring` action after deployment. ** Changed

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-05-26 Thread Alexander Balderson
** Tags added: cdo-qa foundations-engine -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874719 Title: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1874719] Re: Focal/Groovy deploy creates a 'node1' node

2021-03-05 Thread Aurelien Lourot
My analysis was wrong and increasing the timeout [0] didn't help. The charm recovers eventually and running that new `update-ring` action [0] will be a valid workaround for removing `node1` from the corosync ring later on. I'll add an inline comment in the code and work around it in the functional