Thanks, committed the attribution fix to the git repo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327
Title:
package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to
The (proper) fix is now included in the current packages, but t64
bootstrapping is a bit difficult.
When Vladimir promotes
https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap-openjdk-
lts/+sourcepub/15913967/+listing-archive-extra to noble-proposed, that
one can then be used to build
Stuck how? (Can you link to the PPA so I can peek at it?)
Did you add noble-proposed to the PPA’s sources?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327
Title:
package
Hi,
trying to do a build in PPA before sync, but it keeps getting stuck ;(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327
Title:
package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04
Hi again Vladimir,
I did upload a -6 today to temporarily disable the tests to help the ARM
builders across the transition better, so you can also do a sync, I
believe.
Disclaimer: I haven’t tested that on Ubuntu, only Debian, and not yet on
t64-affected architectures (but the powerpc buildds
Thank you!!!
I will do it as a merge then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327
Title:
package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u282-b08-0ubuntu1~20.04 failed to
install/upgrade:
According to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1
they did, so you’ll need https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-
bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/openjdk-8.git;a=commitdiff;h=6586b716485710c94fa2bcb1b85989393f37d856
as well. I’m not uploading this as openjdk-8_8u402-ga-5 to Debian
8u402-ga-4 actually, but first we have to check if Ubuntu indeed stays
with libcups2 (in which case that version should work) or also switches
to libcups2t64 (in which case another change is needed). 8u402-ga-3 had
a… tiny fuckup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi,
I think the problem is that in ubuntu1 package I have rolled back
initial Thorsten's fix and the package to be tested is ga-3 in Debian. I
will raise a sync bug and sync ga-3 package to Noble[1].
[1]
To fix this issue, all architectures should build without atk-wrapper,
not only i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916327
Title:
package openjdk-8-jre-headless
I just tried to build package with higher version to test upgrade and
got the same error:
The following packages will be upgraded:
openjdk-8-jre-headless openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 47 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/54.2 MB of archives.
After this
Hi Thorsten,
I see openjdk-8 8u402-ga-2ubuntu1~22.04 just released, but problem still
exists on focal
Everything works fine when installing this version, but not when
updating from initial version 8u312-b07-0ubuntu1
Steps to reproduce:
Install initial version of openjdk-8-jre-headless
apt
Hi Roman,
Vladimir Petko and I found a solution that retains coïnstallability: on
i386 for focal‥mantic, we fake having the wrapper (as in, all on-disc
files are identical to amd64), but we don’t add the dependency and add a
patch to change the exception to a warning for i386 only.
I’ll upload
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
14 matches
Mail list logo
