[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
re-opening ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => New ** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918035 Title: ld-2.31.so is not

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-05-26 Thread Anastasios Andronidis
libc6-dbg (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) is broken. No ld-2.31.so exists: $ dpkg -L libc6-dbg | grep /ld-2.31; echo $? 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918035 Title: ld-2.31.so is not correctly

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-05-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package glibc - 2.31-0ubuntu9.9 --- glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) focal; urgency=medium * Disable testsuite on riscv64. It is failing maths tests intermittently in ways that cannot be a glibc regression and is disabled in later series anyway. glibc

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-04-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
verified: root@focal-vm:~# dpkg -l libc6-dbg | grep ^ii ii libc6-dbg:amd64 2.31-0ubuntu9.7 amd64GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols root@focal-vm:~# gdb -q /bin/date Reading symbols from /bin/date... (No debugging symbols found in /bin/date) (gdb) starti Starting program:

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-03-16 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918035 Title: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg To manage

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-02-10 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Ppluzhnikov-google, or anyone else affected, Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified: root@focal:~# dpkg-query -W libc6 libc6:amd64 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 root@focal:~# gdb -q /bin/date Reading symbols from /bin/date... (No debugging symbols found in /bin/date) (gdb) starti Starting program: /usr/bin/date Program stopped. 0x77fd0100 in ?? () from

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-12-12 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Ppluzhnikov-google, or anyone else affected, Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-11-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918035

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-08-05 Thread Mario Sánchez Prada
Hi, thanks for reporting and for fixing this! Unfortunately, I'm on Ubuntu 21.04 where the fix hasn't arrived yet as we're still on 2.33-0ubuntu5 [1], and I was wondering if it could be possible to release at least the update to 2.33-0ubuntu6 in there as well, so that we can have sane stack traces

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-06-01 Thread Balint Reczey
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Debug files for ld-linux are not found by gdb making debugging + programs harder. + + [Test Plan] + + * Run a gdb debugging session and observe symbols from ld-linux shown + properly: + + root@ii:~# gdb -q /bin/date + Reading symbols from

[Bug 1918035] Re: ld-2.31.so is not correctly packaged in libc6-dbg

2021-05-21 Thread Balint Reczey
Fixed in 2.33-0ubuntu6. ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glibc