I'm going to take invalidating Ubiquity here to mean "no, we don't
support UFS (or HAMMER(2))" and am going to apply the same logic to
Calamares.
** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062075
Title:
installer does not detect an installation of DragonflyBSD with UFS
To
Ok, so trimming the description down to UFS.
Even then, I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect that installers would
detect it. I mean, AFAIK, UFS support is limited to read only. Which
should be sufficient, but, that may explain why it's poorly supported.
** Summary changed:
- installer does
I **thought** there was a ufs-utils package but I must have dreamt it.
There is a kernel module for UFS though.
The HAMMER filesystems were never ported anywhere outside of DFBSD that
I know of.
Tested Mantic for funsies and the behaviour is the same.
** Tags added: mantic
--
You received
I certainly don't think it's reasonable to expect any installer outside
of the ones DragonBSD-related distros use to recognize HAMMER(2).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062075
Title:
I haven't heard of UFS until today, and I don't think Calamares supports
it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062075
Title:
installer does not detect an installation of DragonflyBSD