[Bug 269133] Re: stacktrace comparisons

2009-03-05 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- stacktrace comparisons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 269133] Re: stacktrace comparisons

2009-03-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 0.142 --- apport (0.142) jaunty; urgency=low * apport/report.py: Do not include lsb_release's stderr in the DistroRelease: output. * apport/hookutils.py: Fix attach_printing(): - Correct spelling or error_log. - Do not call

[Bug 269133] Re: stacktrace comparisons

2009-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
261773 crashes in paintOutputRegion(), while 211107 crashes in animWalkNext() (although the next stack frame is paintOutputRegion()). I don't think we should generally auto-duplicate those 'fuzzy' matches, since it easily leads to false positives. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 269133] Re: stacktrace comparisons

2009-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Oh, in fact the second trace is also in animWalkNext(), however, the stack trace is missing an address for it: #0 animWalkNext (w=0x8710850) at animation.c:3252 it should be #0 0xb58694e8 in animWalkNext (w=0x81eda10) at animation.c:3048 Smells like a gdb buglet. I don't know how common

[Bug 269133] Re: stacktrace comparisons

2008-09-11 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti) -- stacktrace comparisons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list