[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2010-09-19 Thread Tim Knight
timkni...@timknight-laptop:~$ sudo fdisk /dev/mmcblk0 [sudo] password for timknight: You will not be able to write the partition table. Unable to read /dev/mmcblk0 timkni...@timknight-laptop:~$ Now what? I'm lost and frustrated after reading a zillion threads and causing enough code errors to

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2010-09-19 Thread Rocko
@Tim: this particular bug was fixed a long time ago and so it isn't the best place to look for help. Your bug looks like a different one anyway, so I recommend you open a new bug. Perhaps the problem is related to the fact you're using a _micro_ SD card...? My 2GB and 8GB (non-micro) SD cards both

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2010-09-18 Thread Tim Knight
i am running a dual boot HP laptop about two years old. i am using windows vista and lucid lynx, having upgraded ubuntu from hardy heron. i cannot get my SD card to be recognized or mounted on the OS. i have been trying a variety of ubuntu and linux help sites - which all state the bug is fixed -

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2010-09-18 Thread Tim Knight
correction... i know sudo -lu is the wrong command line. i did use the right one to get the drive list, i forget the command at the moment of writing this. -- gparted no longer detects mmcblk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2010-09-18 Thread Tim Knight
sudo fdisk -lu gives me the following output: Disk /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-08-11 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Also closing the linux (Ubuntu) kernel task. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- gparted no longer detects mmcblk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-08-09 Thread Rocko
I changed the status to fix released (by accident initially - who knew you could just do that by clicking on the status and not have to confirm it?!). However, it is fixed for Karmic since Karmic includes gparted 0.4.5. ** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released --

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-06-21 Thread Rocko
I confirm that the latest gparted (0.4.5) detects the mmcblk device on my pc. Unfortunately the jaunty repositories still only have the old 0.4.3 version, which doesn't detect it. -- gparted no longer detects mmcblk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275345 You received this bug notification

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-04-02 Thread gedakc
See also GParted Bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564985 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #564985 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564985 -- gparted no longer detects mmcblk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275345 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-04-02 Thread gedakc
GParted 0.4.4 has just been released. It includes a bug fix to recognize /dev/mmcblk# devices. See GParted Bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572703 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #572703 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572703 -- gparted no longer detects

[Bug 275345] Re: gparted no longer detects mmcblk

2009-03-13 Thread Rocko
Changing from linux to gparted since fdisk in kernel 2.6.82-8+ now recognises the mmcblk device, but gparted still doesn't. ** Summary changed: - [intrepid] mmcblk0 detection is broken - fdisk -l no longer shows it + gparted no longer detects mmcblk ** Description changed: - Intrepid's fdisk