emacs26 in disco gives the error
"Re-entering top level after C stack overflow" which seems like an appropriate
error.
** Changed in: emacs25 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =>
** Tags added: cosmic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: emacs25 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #882957
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882957
** Also affects: emacs25 (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882957
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Do you mean this is a new way to repro? Which replaces the old? (For
all versions, or just the latest one you tried?)
If we are to finally report this upstream, can you provide a brief use
case to assess the priority of this? If it's just an academic
curiosity, I don't really see the point; but
Looks like my example code needed 'map'
(defun map (f l)
"map function?"
(if
(nullp l)
'()
(if (listp l)
(if (= 1 (length l))
(list (funcall f (car l)))
(if (> (length l) 1)
(cons (map f (car l))
** Tags added: artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To manage notifications about this bug go
reproduced same kind of issue in emacs 25 using slightly more
complicated lisp code, plenty of ram left:
first file seqfile1:
(setq undo-outer-limit (expt 2 23))
(setq max-lisp-eval-depth (expt 2 17))
(setq max-specpdl-size (expt 2 17))
(setq message-log-max 4)
(setq
I don't remember and don't see anything in debian's bug tracking system.
That said... I can no longer crash emacs25 in zesty with the above sample code.
The code still doesn't work...but the bug in question here (crashing the
entirety of emacs) no longer exists.
--
You received this bug
Did you ever attempt to report this upstream? Does the bug exist in a
recent emacs-snapshot? If so, we should probably forward this to the
Emacs maintainers rather than have it linger here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Tags added: yakkety
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To manage notifications about this bug go
still valid in ubuntu 16.04 / emacs 24.5+1-6ubuntu1
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with
** Also affects: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with
Still valid in Ubuntu 15.10 / emacs 24.4+1-4ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To manage
just making clear this still does exist in emacs24
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
Title:
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
To manage
Backtrace:
#0 0x005fccda in Feval (form=Cannot access memory at address
0x7fff7aa96fc8
) at eval.c:2217
#1 0x005fd0e6 in Feval (form=17203878) at eval.c:2311
#2 0x005fea9a in apply_lambda (fun=17203526, args=17203734,
eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3122
#3 0x005fd584
(needless to say there was more to the backtrace than that, about 3-5000
frames worth after #9)
and version 23.1.9x which still has the bug
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because
This appears to be fixed in emacs version 23.1.91, not 100% sure but
seems to be.
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
...or not, disregard #5. Seemed to be working for abit but it's back to
segfaulting again. Hmm...
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37990492/Dependencies.txt
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
should be (por 0 0.01 10)
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I should note that it isn't hitting memory limits on my system (unless
it's trying to allocate too fast or something) -- top shows I have gigs
of ram to spare. Just tried on karmic's emacs23, as well as debian syd:
bug still exists.
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with
I meant debian sid _. Freudian slip.
--
Setting max-specpdl-size of 34295 allows segfaults with 'simple' elisp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
23 matches
Mail list logo
