[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-02-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1255-0ubuntu1 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1255-0ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low [ Dave Walker (Daviey) ] * New upstream snapshot of minor point release, 2.0.1 (r1255). - Fixes FTBFS, (LP: #687970) - Stop unauthenticated

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-02-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 2.0.1+bzr1255-0ubuntu1 --- eucalyptus (2.0.1+bzr1255-0ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low [ Dave Walker (Daviey) ] * New upstream snapshot of minor point release, 2.0.1 (r1255). - Fixes FTBFS, (LP: #687970) - Stop unauthenticated

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-02-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4)

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-02-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/natty/eucalyptus/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Please see revno 1255 (latest) of Eucalyptus (lp:eucalyptus/2.0). That branch should resolve java and C compilation issues for Natty. The C compilation fix was twofold: re-arrange the gcc commandlines in various Makefiles to put system library link options after local object options (gcc *.c *.o

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Please see revno 1255 (latest) of Eucalyptus (lp:eucalyptus/2.0). That branch should resolve java and C compilation issues for Natty. The C compilation fix was twofold: re-arrange the gcc commandlines in various Makefiles to put system library link options after local object options (gcc *.c *.o

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
about the java failure: is this seen with openjdk-7 (available from the openjdk PPA) too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-05 Thread Firas Kraïem
I can't install openjdk-7 from the PPA, there seems to be a version/dependency issue: r...@itsuki:~# apt-get install openjdk-7-jre-lib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
about the java failure: is this seen with openjdk-7 (available from the openjdk PPA) too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus'

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-05 Thread Firas Kraïem
I can't install openjdk-7 from the PPA, there seems to be a version/dependency issue: r...@itsuki:~# apt-get install openjdk-7-jre-lib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-26 Thread Firas Kraïem
I wonder why it didn't show this bug as a possible duplicate when I filed 694599... Anyway, I submittd a patch there that fixes the linking errors, but the package still fails to build because of Java-related error. SInce I know very little about Java, I can't go further. :[ -- You received this

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-26 Thread Firas Kraïem
I wonder why it didn't show this bug as a possible duplicate when I filed 694599... Anyway, I submittd a patch there that fixes the linking errors, but the package still fails to build because of Java-related error. SInce I know very little about Java, I can't go further. :[ -- You received this

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-15 Thread Matthias Klose
storage/Makefile doesn't mention the complete set of libraries for the test binary. At least -lssl has to be added ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-15 Thread Matthias Klose
storage/Makefile doesn't mention the complete set of libraries for the test binary. At least -lssl has to be added ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Dave Walker
Build log of eucalyptus (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) on amd64 architecture. ** Attachment added: build-eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-amd64.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970/+attachment/1760669/+files/build-eucalyptus_2.0%2Bbzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-amd64.log ** Tags added: amd64 --

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Dave Walker
Build log of eucalyptus (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) on i386 architecture. ** Attachment added: build-eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-i386.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970/+attachment/1760670/+files/build-eucalyptus_2.0%2Bbzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-i386.log ** Tags added: i386 -- You

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Dave Walker
Build log of eucalyptus (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) on amd64 architecture. ** Attachment added: build-eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-amd64.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970/+attachment/1760669/+files/build-eucalyptus_2.0%2Bbzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-amd64.log ** Tags added: amd64 --

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Dave Walker
Build log of eucalyptus (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) on i386 architecture. ** Attachment added: build-eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-i386.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970/+attachment/1760670/+files/build-eucalyptus_2.0%2Bbzr1241-0ubuntu4-natty-i386.log ** Tags added: i386 -- You

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2010-12-09 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: