[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-07-03 Thread Iustin Pop
I concur with comment #5. This pulls in consolekit on many non-X installations. Is there a technical reason why lightdm can't be fixed to properly log to wtmp? Or should the acpi-support-base be split into a base package (no heavyweight dependencies) and acpi-support package? Well, we already

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-05-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package acpi-support - 0.138.1 --- acpi-support (0.138.1) oneiric-proposed; urgency=low * Added lenovo-touchpad2 from precise acpi-support-0.140 which supports newer thinkpads that are in the certification process. * Backported power-funcs from

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-05-23 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-05-22 Thread Ayan George
Verified that this works on a Sutton machine. This does require a change to an OEM script that locally implements the new getXuser though. I'll let the OEM team know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-05-21 Thread James M. Leddy
Hi Ayan, what were the results of your test? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user To

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/acpi-support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-21 Thread Ayan George
Thank you Clint! I'll test on Monday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user To manage

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-20 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello Ayan, or anyone else affected, Accepted acpi-support into oneiric-proposed. The package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
** Also affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon) Status: Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title:

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Uploaded with a more meaningful changelog, fixed LP bug refs, and fixed version number. Thanks! ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Debdiff from acpi-support .138 to .138-ubuntu1 acpi-support is an Ubuntu native package. Please use 0.138-0.1 instead as an SRU version number. ** Also affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-03 Thread Ayan George
Debdiff from acpi-support .138 to .138-ubuntu1 ** Description changed: + SRU Justificaiton + - - The acpi-support scripts use 'ps' and 'who' output to determine the current active X display and X user (in getXconsole and getXuser). Currently, LightDM does not write to utmp

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-04-03 Thread Ayan George
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert-enablement ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = oneiric-updates ** Description changed: SRU Justificaiton - Impact: This bug impacts all Oneiric systems which use LightDM and are affected by lp870297 (Lightdm

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-03-24 Thread Axel Beckert
Meh, now this pulls in consolekit on lightweight or non-X Debian installations, too. Can't the consolekit usage be made optional? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title:

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-03-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package acpi-support - 0.139 --- acpi-support (0.139) precise; urgency=low * lib/power-funcs: adjust getXuser and getXconsole to use consolekit instead of ps/who to identify the foreground session and the owner of a given X session, since lightdm

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-03-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:acpi-support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user To manage

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Thanks for the patch! some feedback: - the check for x11-display matches all sessions including console sessions, because x11-display is always set. We need to specifically check for a non-empty value here. - the rotatescreen.sh script specifically assumes that getXconsole() can be applied

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-02-24 Thread Ayan George
** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-02-16 Thread Ayan George
** Patch added: power-funcs.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626/+attachment/2745858/+files/power-funcs.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933626 Title: acpi-support

[Bug 933626] Re: acpi-support should use ck-list-sessions to determine active X display and X user

2012-02-16 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
The attachment power-funcs.diff of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch'