[Bug 969604] [NEW] lxc-stop should be able to handle ephemeral containers more robustly

2012-03-30 Thread Gary Poster
Public bug reported: It is possible to have an ephemeral container remaining after lxc-start- ephemeral has been killed--trivially by calling kill -9 on lxc-start- ephemeral. At that point, the script does not get a chance to clean up after itself, and the system is left with a running ephemeral

[Bug 969604] [NEW] lxc-stop should be able to handle ephemeral containers more robustly

2012-03-30 Thread Gary Poster
Public bug reported: It is possible to have an ephemeral container remaining after lxc-start- ephemeral has been killed--trivially by calling kill -9 on lxc-start- ephemeral. At that point, the script does not get a chance to clean up after itself, and the system is left with a running ephemeral