[Bug 910962] Re: installArchives() failed: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: syntax error: unknown group 'postdrop' in statoverride file Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin

2012-01-07 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
You should give more info on how you managed to get into this situation. The real problem is that the postdrop group has been removed while it was still in use by dpkg for some statoverride information. Either postfix did drop the group without unregistering the statoverride, or you made a mistake

[Bug 961115] Re: DPKG failed to locate File/Temp.pm in @INC ... during samba upgrade

2012-03-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This is update-inetd not working due to missing File/Temp.pm module. What's the output of dpkg -S File/Temp.pm ? And dpkg -s perl-modules update-inetd ? In any case it's not a dpkg issue... maybe samba should also be improved to not fail when update-inetd fails in postrm ? Not sure. ** Package

[Bug 1007433] Re: circular dependency causes zookeeperd to not be running after installation of zookeeperd

2012-06-02 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Clint, where do you see a *circular* dependency? The dependencies that you show are not circular. Also the ordering of package installation is decided by apt and not dpkg, so this is an apt bug if any. ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received

[Bug 234901] Re: Please apply upstream patch for dpkg-buildsource

2011-03-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Upstream doesn't impose anything. ubuntu has made the choice to keep that setting via the Dpkg::Vendor infrastructure. Thus marking it as wontfix for dpkg. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 860822] Re: package fglrx 2:8.872-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/lib/fglrx/etc/ati/authatieventsd.sh usr/src/fglrx-8.872/dkms.conf usr/src/fglrx-8.872/libfglrx_ip.a] failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMess

2011-09-27 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Reassigning to fglrx since its preinst script is failing. ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860822 Title: package fglrx

[Bug 862963] Re: No emblems in Nautilus 3.2.0

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Do you have the oneiric version of nautilus-dropbox installed ? Are you on i386 or on amd64 ? Does a rebuild of the package fix the problem for you ? You can learn how to rebuild a package here: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15 /howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/ -- You received this bug

[Bug 573696] Re: dpkg: ../../src/archives.c:763: tarobject: Assertion `r == stab.st_size' failed. Aborted

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Gary, so drop /usr/lib/python2.6/dist- packages/gwibber/microblog/dispatcher.py and retry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573696 Title: dpkg: ../../src/archives.c:763: tarobject:

[Bug 573696] Re: dpkg: ../../src/archives.c:763: tarobject: Assertion `r == stab.st_size' failed. Aborted

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The fix for this has been included in dpkg 1.16.1 upstream. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #639229 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639229 ** Also affects: dpkg (Debian) via

[Bug 855793] Re: Kubuntu 11.10 beta 1: Error upgrading using muon

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The log in #861827 seems to indicate that it's the postrm of kde- window-manager that we're upgrading from that is hanging... ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = kde-workspace (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: kde-workspace (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 862963] Re: No emblems in Nautilus 3.2.0

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Search no longer, 0.6.8-1 works fine but 0.6.9 from the dropbox repository is probably not compiled for Nautilus 3.2... Please don't file bug against Ubuntu if you're not using the official Ubuntu package. I would suggest to disable the dropbox repository and downgrade to the Ubuntu package. **

[Bug 863199] Re: Update Manager does not update-shows error

2011-09-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
You have been given bad advice. They meant sudo dpkg --configure -a or sudo apt-get -f install. But this is not a user support channel... so I'm closing this bug report since it doesn't contain any useful bug. Concerning the dpkg-mainscript-helper: error: couldn't identify the package error

[Bug 855926] Re: package nautilus-dropbox 0.6.8-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255

2011-09-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Please read the error message, it's not a bug in the package but a problem with your connection to the dropbox servers. When your internet connection works again, sudo dpkg --configure -a will finish the installation of nautilus-dropbox. ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 855793] Re: Kubuntu 11.10 beta 1: Error upgrading using muon

2011-09-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I'm afraid this has been hastily reassigned, there's no data in the bug log to decide where the problem is. There's no proof that dpkg is blocking and I'm quite sure it doesn't. However one of the packages that you are trying to install might well try to interact with you on the terminal and if

[Bug 856681] Re: package libqtgui4 4:4.7.2-0ubuntu6.2 failed to install/upgrade: short read on buffer copy for backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4.7.2'

2011-09-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
šumski, this article explains that it's a corrupted .deb file and thus an invalid bug report... not that the bug must be reassigned to dpkg and reopened! ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 945502] Re: package nautilus-dropbox 0.6.8-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-03 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This is already fixed in newer releases (0.7.1-*). ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945502 Title: package

[Bug 945811] Re: package nautilus-dropbox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesso script post-removal instalado retornou erro do status de saída 2

2012-03-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 937546 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937546 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937546 package nautilus-dropbox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 -- You

[Bug 939288] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort()

2012-03-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This was a bug in glib, it has been fixed in the mean time. ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 939241] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort()

2012-03-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This was a bug in glib, it has been fixed in the mean time. ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 930429] Re: Segmentation Fault on shared-mime-info during apt-get install -f

2012-02-11 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The segmentation fault happens in the shared-mime-info package (in its postinst script). It's not a bug in dpkg. ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = shared-mime-info (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 384307] Re: package foomatic-db-engine 4.0.0-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: sous-processus rm cleanup tu? par le signal (Erreur de segmentation)

2012-02-11 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
dpkg is just reporting that rm failed. Somehow I doubt it's a bug in rm, it's more likely an underlying hardware problem (memory corrupted?). Reassigning to coreutils but changing it to incomplete because I doubt anyone can reproduce it... ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = coreutils (Ubuntu)

[Bug 909488] Re: nautilus-dropbox doesn't install dropbox client to correct location

2012-01-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Installing binaries in ~/.dropbox-dist/ of each user and letting any user process update them there is certainly not a good choice from a security point of view (and it's certainly not in line with the Debian policy). Having a single way to install the binary system-wide and having that mechanism

[Bug 909488] Re: nautilus-dropbox forbids dropbox's non-free binaries to replace themselves by properly installing dropbox system-wide

2012-01-30 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
For the record, just like any wrapper, the user can force an update/re- installation at any point of time with dropbox update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909488 Title:

[Bug 938544] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 938783] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938544] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938632] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937872 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in

[Bug 937872] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in

[Bug 938595] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938414] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937872 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in

[Bug 938265] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937872 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in

[Bug 938155] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938583] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938543] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938341] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 938371] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 937784 nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or

[Bug 937784] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_thread_abort()

2012-02-22 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932627 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932627 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932627 nautilus crashes when opening any folder or file (nautilus-dropbox and new glib) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 937546] Re: package nautilus-dropbox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

2012-02-23 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Snoopyski, are you sure you're referring to the same problem ? (aka this bug is about the post-removal script failing during upgrade... nothing else). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 924548] Re: dpkg fails to install java icedtea plugin and critical updates

2012-01-31 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Hello, thanks for your report but I'm afraid you don't provide enough information about the failure and dpkg is probably not the right package for this report. Please look in the logs (of the terminal or in /var/log/apt/) and find the underlying error and file the bug (or reassign this one moving

[Bug 925057] Re: package python-launchpadlib 1.9.7-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus dpkg-deb --control a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2

2012-02-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The underlying error comes from tar but it looks like some weird kernel problem because I don't see how open can fail with invalid argument. ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 926700] Re: nautilus-dropbox_0.7.1_i386.deb not installable in Precise

2012-02-05 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
nautilus-dropbox_0.7.1_i386.deb is not the Ubuntu package so there's nothing we can do. The version 0.7.1-2 is in precise and depends on libnautilus-extension1a which is in precise. ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 941567] Re: dropbox crashed with OSError in unpack(): [Errno 1] Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt: '/var/lib/dropbox/.dropbox-dist'

2012-02-26 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Did it query you for getting root rights? You should not have permissions issues if you are root and dropbox update is supposed to ask for root rights (via policy kit). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 941567] Re: dropbox crashed with OSError in unpack(): [Errno 1] Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt: '/var/lib/dropbox/.dropbox-dist'

2012-02-26 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I'm marking it as invalid, per your request. But there's still something weird with the error reported. It doesn't make sense to not have the right to do unpack the new version. What filesystem are you using on /var/? Do you have some unusual security policy? ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox

[Bug 942623] Re: package libmono-system-data2.0-cil 2.6.7-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libmono-system-data2.0-cil is already installed and configured

2012-02-29 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 943873] Re: gnome-terminal ellipses inconsistency

2012-03-01 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Sticking the ellipsis to the last word makes it impossible to select the last word by double clicking on it. It's also more difficult to parse for scripts. It's not a big deal when the word before the ellipsis is just an English word, but when it's a dynamic value like in this case, I believe it's

[Bug 932627] Re: nautilus crashes when opening any folder or file

2012-02-16 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Brian, can you verify if uninstalling nautilus-dropbox fixes the problem? And if reinstalling it triggers it again? If removing nautilus-dropbox doesn't fix the problem, try the same with nautilus-share. It would be great if you could provide a gdb backtrace, see

[Bug 934112] Re: dpkg aborts

2012-02-17 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
You fixed the problem a bit too quickly... now tell me how can I reproduce it? You should have made a backup of all the important files in /var/lib/dpkg/ (at least status, possibly the content of the updates directory too, if not empty) when you were encountering the problem. -- You received

[Bug 929702] Re: Add common error checks: Dpkg produces unclear error messages if out of disk space

2012-02-17 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
dpkg is giving the proper error message: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/oxygen-icon-theme_4%%3a4.8.0-0ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): unable to create `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/meeting-participant-request-response.png.dpkg-new' (while processing

[Bug 902587] Re: libreoffice-core not seen by dpkg while installed

2012-02-17 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Unless someone else can reproduce it, or provide instructions to reproduce it, I fear this bug will rot uselessly. Thus I'm currently marking it as incomplete. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 873435] Re: dpkg should not simplify version numbers in dependencies

2012-02-17 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873435 Title: dpkg should not simplify version numbers in dependencies To manage

Re: [Bug 934112] Re: dpkg aborts

2012-02-17 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
this bug ? I don't have any oneiric chroot to reproduce it quickly... Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 872734] Re: dpkg coredumps if FIGETBSZ ioctl return -ENOTTY

2011-10-12 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
It seems to me that the proper fix is rather to not try to sort the list of packages if we don't have any meaningful value in listfile_phys_offs... thus the attached patch. ** Attachment added: Don't try to sort when nothing to sort on

[Bug 872734] Re: dpkg coredumps if FIGETBSZ ioctl return -ENOTTY

2011-10-12 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872734 Title: dpkg coredumps

[Bug 872734] Re: dpkg coredumps if FIGETBSZ ioctl return -ENOTTY

2011-10-13 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
A fix has been committed upstream, see commit 916bdba9095bd361cb2bccd6f566ecffdb206193. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=916bdba9095bd361cb2bccd6f566ecffdb206193 ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug

[Bug 853679] Re: dselect has an error in the Provides: package multiarch case

2011-10-13 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I guess you're referring to liblcms1 (and not libcms1 which doesn't exist). That packages indeed has a Provides/Conflicts/Replaces on a virtual package liblcms. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 853679] Re: dselect has an error in the Provides: package multiarch case

2011-10-13 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This patch seems to fix the problem for me. I have integrated it in my pu/multiarch/full branch so it will land in dpkg upstream with the rest of the multiarch branch. ** Attachment added: Patch to let dselect ignore conflict via a virtual package between 2 instances of the same package

[Bug 873601] Re: package libxapian22 1.2.4-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libxapian22 is already installed and configured

2011-10-13 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 873709] Re: package dpkg 1.16.0~ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: unable to create `/usr/share/doc/dpkg/THANKS.gz.dpkg-new' (while processing `./usr/share/doc/dpkg/THANKS.gz'): Invalid argument

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I'm afraid this is more a local problem than a real bug in dpkg. Looking at dmesg, there are many errors generated by your hard disk. What filesystem are you using? ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 873738] Re: package stellarium-data 0.10.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package stellarium-data is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873737 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873737 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 873737 package dia-common 0.97.1-7build1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package dia-common is already installed and configured -- You received

[Bug 873737] Re: package dia-common 0.97.1-7build1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package dia-common is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 873729] Re: package ttf-opensymbol 2:2.4.3 LibO3.3.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package ttf-opensymbol is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The real error is this one. I suggest you get more memory on your computer and/or add some swap. Unpacking libjaxp1.3-java (from .../libjaxp1.3-java_1.3.05-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: fork failed: Cannot allocate memory ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)

[Bug 873908] Re: package virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin 6.1.2 dfsg1-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 874156] Re: package libqtwebkit4 2.1~really2.0.2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libqtwebkit4 is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 874140 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874140 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 874140 package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is already installed and configured

[Bug 874155] Re: package libqtwebkit4 2.1~really2.0.2-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libqtwebkit4 is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 874140 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874140 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 874140 package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is already installed and configured

[Bug 874030] Re: package libc6 2.13-0ubuntu13 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libc6 is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
So you fixed the problem and it's not really a dpkg bug. I doubt this copy of the libc was put there by an official package. I'm thus closing this bug. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 874140] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is already installed and configured

2011-10-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 874717] Re: package apt-utils 0.8.13.2ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package apt-utils is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The error is really a hardware problem or something similar, it's not a bug in dpkg. Input/output error is just an error that comes back from the hardware. Unpacking replacement apt-utils ... dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old post-removal script (/var/lib/dpkg/info/apt-utils.postrm):

[Bug 874562] Re: package wine1.3 1.3.15-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package wine1.3 is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 874358] Re: package chromium-browser 14.0.835.202~r103287-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package chromium-browser is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 874752] Re: package libgtk2.0-cil 2.12.10-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libgtk2.0-cil is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This error is really weird. dpkg-deb has been called hundreds of times without problem but here we get a weird linking failure... reassigning to eglibc in case they have an idea but it's probably a glitch that can't really be explained. Unpacking replacement libgtk2.0-cil ... dpkg-deb:

[Bug 874765] Re: package bash 4.2-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package bash is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The real error is this one. This should in theory never happen as dpkg creates the required directories before trying to unpack files. Did you remove some files or directories while dpkg was working ? Unpacking replacement bash ... Replaced by files in installed package bash-completion ...

[Bug 874790] Re: package base-files 5.0.0ubuntu28 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package base-files is already installed and configured

2011-10-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The real error is the one below and it doesn't make sense to me. Can you show us the output of ls -l /mnt ? Do you use some security module (selinux, smack, etc.) that could refuse the access to /mnt ? Can you show us the output of mount ? Did you have something mounted on /mnt during the install

[Bug 800903] Re: package openoffice.org-voikko 2.1-1build3 failed to install/upgrade:

2011-06-23 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The initial error seems to come from APT which fails to install openoffice.org-core because it failed to deal with a conflict and thus dpkg failed... Selecting previously deselected package openoffice.org-core. dpkg: regarding .../openoffice.org-core_1%3a3.2.0-7ubuntu4.2_i386.deb containing

[Bug 801437] Re: parser too strict

2011-06-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
What version of dpkg were you using? The latest version 1.16.0.3ubuntu2 is supposed to fix this. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 801437] Re: parser too strict

2011-06-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I see it's in oneiric only currently. I asked Steve Langasek Colin Watson to prepare an SRU some time ago not sure if it will happen, we'll see. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801437

[Bug 801667] Re: package texlive-latex-base-doc 2009-7 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package texlive-latex-base-doc is already installed and configured

2011-06-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The error message is the following: Unpacking replacement texlive-font-utils ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-font- utils_2009-10ubuntu1_all.deb (--unpack): failed to stat (dereference) existing symlink `/usr/share/doc/texlive- doc/fonts/fontinst/test/testsc.tex':

[Bug 808923] Re: package libxkbfile1 1:1.0.6-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libxkbfile1 is already installed and configured

2011-07-11 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

[Bug 809225] Re: package menu 2.1.44ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package menu is already installed and configured

2011-07-12 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809223 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809223 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809223 package startupmanager 1.9.13-5 failed to install/upgrade: package startupmanager is already installed and configured -- You received this bug

[Bug 809223] Re: package startupmanager 1.9.13-5 failed to install/upgrade: package startupmanager is already installed and configured

2011-07-12 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
We need the complete upgrade log where you saw this error message, without it this bug cannot be further investigated. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 810070] Re: package b43-fwcutter 1:012-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: package b43-fwcutter is already installed and configured

2011-07-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
I'm afraid the attached log do not give any information about the problem you encountered. Thus I'm marking this bug as invalid. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 809223] Re: package startupmanager 1.9.13-5 failed to install/upgrade: package startupmanager is already installed and configured

2011-07-14 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
We need a log of the terminal where we see the output of the calls to dpkg. I think it's /var/log/apt/term.log or something like that (I can't remember). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 809223] Re: package startupmanager 1.9.13-5 failed to install/upgrade: package startupmanager is already installed and configured

2011-07-15 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you, that was the right file. It looks like apt is the culprit. It installs both packages entirely and then tries to configure it a second time for no good reason. It's weird because apt usually does unpack + configure in 2 steps, and here it looks like it called dpkg -i directly for those 2

[Bug 858395] Re: Google Voice adapters are not working

2011-09-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Input/output error means that there's failing hardware involved, it's not a bug in dpkg, sorry. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 857758] Re: package libpam-modules 1.1.2-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libpam-modules is already installed and configured

2011-09-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The error is in pam: Preparing to replace libpam-modules 1.1.2-2ubuntu8.3 (using .../libpam- modules_1.1.3-2ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam- modules_1.1.3-2ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status

[Bug 850680] Re: package cups 1.4.6-5ubuntu1.4 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 10 zurück

2011-09-24 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The fact that several packages are affected does not mean that dpkg is at fault reassigning back to foomatic-filters, one should look what's common between the 3 postinst. ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = foomatic-filters (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 858490] Re: package vlc-data (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive

2011-09-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This is a file corruption problem and not a bug in dpkg. Do sudo apt- get clean and retry. Unpacking vlc-data (from .../vlc-data_1.0.6-1ubuntu1.8_all.deb) ... dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) dpkg: error processing

[Bug 846871] Re: dropbox crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'content-length'

2011-09-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846871 Title: dropbox crashed with KeyError in __getitem__(): 'content-length' To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 858724] Re: package nautilus-dropbox 0.6.8-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 255 zurück

2011-09-25 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
This is a network problem between you and the Dropbox server at the time of the installation, it fails on purpose in that case as dropbox can't be installed if it can't be downloaded. ** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 859469] Re: dpkg locks during installation

2011-09-26 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Please use --debug=3 (or --debug=13) and resend your log. My guess is that it's not dpkg that gets blocked but one of the maintainer scripts. In which case this bug should be filed against apt and not dpkg. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Bug 840423] Re: dpkg assert failure: dpkg: ../../src/filesdb.c:668: findnamenode: Assertion `(*pointerp)-name[0] == '/'' failed.

2011-09-26 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840423 Title: dpkg assert failure: dpkg: ../../src/filesdb.c:668: findnamenode: Assertion `(*pointerp)-name[0] ==

[Bug 860009] Re: package gconf2-common 2.31.91-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package gconf2-common is already installed and configured

2011-09-27 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Please run sudo dpkg --clear-avail and sudo dpkg -P virtualbox-2.2 virtualbox-3.0. It should fix most of your problems. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 863675] [NEW] dpkg wrongly claims that a foreign-arch package is disappeared by a removed native-arch package

2011-10-05 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/ ** Patch added: 0001-dpkg-do-not-try-to-drop-files-from-other-packages-in.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863675/+attachment

Re: [Bug 865581] [NEW] dpkg does not completely install LibreOffice Daily builds

2011-10-03 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
the error messages that appear before this. This is only a summary of the failures, and we need to see the exact error message. You might be able to to find a more complete log in /var/log/apt/. At this point, it seems unlikely to be a bug in dpkg. status incomplete Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog

[Bug 865581] Re: dpkg does not completely install LibreOffice Daily builds

2011-10-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
So I confirm it's not a bug in dpkg, it's the libreoffice package whose postrm script are failing. But the error message mentions files in /opt/ so it's not an official ubuntu package and there's probably not much that we can do. Reassigning to libreoffice anyway. Maybe it's a bug in unopkg. **

[Bug 866783] Re: package util-linux 2.17.2-9.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package util-linux is already installed and configured

2011-10-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 866577 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866577 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 866577 package mount 2.17.2-9.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package mount is already installed and configured -- You received this bug

[Bug 866694] Re: package libpam-modules 1.1.2-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libpam-modules is already installed and configured

2011-10-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 866577 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866577 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 866577 package mount 2.17.2-9.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package mount is already installed and configured -- You received this bug

[Bug 866620] Re: package hostname 3.05ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package hostname is already installed and configured

2011-10-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 866577 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866577 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 866577 package mount 2.17.2-9.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package mount is already installed and configured -- You received this bug

[Bug 866577] Re: package mount 2.17.2-9.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package mount is already installed and configured

2011-10-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The initial problem is this one: Setting up libpam0g (1.1.3-2ubuntu1) ... Checking for services that may need to be restarted...Checking init scripts... WARNING: init script for samba not found. dpkg: error processing libpam0g (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script

[Bug 874790] Re: package base-files 5.0.0ubuntu28 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package base-files is already installed and configured

2011-10-16 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Ok, reassigning to sshfs then because I don't see why root should not have the right to stat a file even if remote mounted ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = sshfs-fuse (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 874030] Re: package libc6 2.13-0ubuntu13 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libc6 is already installed and configured

2011-10-16 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
The log says: Preparing to replace libc6 2.13-0ubuntu13 (using .../libc6_2.13-20ubuntu5_i386.deb) ... So you upgraded from 2.13-0ubuntu13 to 2.13-20ubuntu5. There's no way that libc-2.12.1.so was a packaged file... at least not coming from the libc6 package in version 2.13! In any case, it's

[Bug 874974] Re: package groff-base 1.21-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package groff-base is already installed and configured

2011-10-16 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >