** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066064
Title:
Dell Latitude 5450 and 5550 Ethernet dropped packets (Intel
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2066081
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thanks for the additional testing.
The erase disk & install using encryption gets more QA
(https://discourse.lubuntu.me/t/testing-checklist-noble/4809 shows six
QA tests for that), and whilst there are some manual partitioning
install tests, no encryption is mandated there.
--
You received this
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thanks for responding, AND asking for further help!
Sorry I didn't think thru my wording clear enough... To be useful the
`apport-collect` has to be run AFTER a failed install, however to confirm it
failed (by your already provided description) you need to reboot & thus the
report I want
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
If possible, can you boot your system (using 24.04 media you tried to
install) and try the install again, assuming it fails again, please
follow the following instructions AFTER the error has [re-]occurred.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2064845
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
** Tags added: noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064846
Title:
xfce4-panel should be upgraded to 4.18.6 if glib 2.80 is used
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Likely duplicate (or related) to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1900266
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064668
Title:
Calamares/Kubuntu 24.04: Can't create
** Tags added: oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064180
Title:
calamares-finish-oem.desktop is untrusted
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2063500
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2063516
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056578 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056578
Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
Thank you Mate for working out issue & great explanation..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060624
Title:
lubuntu/xubuntu reinstall (& install) on dual boot system, grub does
appear
install using Lubuntu 20240425 ISO (latest RC as of now) and issue
reoccurred. on ISO is
calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu4
as before
- erase disk & install to dc7700
- install alongside (slider moved random amount as usual, so size [of
partitions] aren't critical
- install & re-use SDA1 (first
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
You mention it was "Reported 1 year 8 months ago" if so please provide
the bug report link, as you only provided reference to a support site
(which isn't a bug report). FYI: I'd have appreciated a picture of the
Booted an install made earlier today on hp_compaq_dc7700 of lubuntu
noble (20240424) ;
https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/453/builds/300235/testcases/1701/results/
sudo apt update; sudo apt full-upgrade & no updates are available.
(software-properties-qt 0.99.48.1)
Following the
(
another FYI I mentioned it's no longer re-creatable with Xubuntu due to
forced FORMAT currently with `ubuntu-desktop-installer` ...
the issue i'm referring to is/was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-
desktop-provision/+bug/2058638 .. current 'fix' being to force format ,
but my
Just an FYI... but on the two cases I've encountered this issue I didn't
install as per #14. I'll have always performed a
1. full disk install (any prior partitioning erased); noble (may not have been
lubuntu) but single partition only
2. install alongside (calamares wording; auto-resize type
I completed an install on dc7700
- two systems (noble) exist on drive
- boot install media (lubuntu noble RC)
- select partition (I selected SDA2, ignoring SDA1) for `/` WITHOUT FORMAT
- let it install
(this system is OLD, legacy-BIOS so no ESP; Lubuntu's calamares doesn't
create one by default
I have made many installs of various boxes, and exploring logs of the
iso.qa.ubu link in comment #3 i see only two references to this issue
(within a few days of each other), which include the following
---
hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
testcase: install using
Another boot on next box
- hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600)
This box shares same screens, so pretty much same change in
monitor.settings; except I didn't have to change the primary.display as
what booted in live mode is what I prefer.
identical issue & behavior though as last
first boot of lubuntu noble RC on
- hp prodesk 400 g1 sff (i5-4570, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
live test, on adjusting displays to match my config... what was by
default.right monitor below the default.left, plus making my.bottom
(what was default.right) monitor the
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2062428
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2062106
maybe???
that message says 900 secs (not 600) ... is there a condition for time
of internet (900 for wifi; 600 for cable here.. but cause I see as
identical)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
repeat only different timeout period? in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2060592
duplicate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062106
Title:
lubuntu noble -
If this isn't changed... Lubuntu (me) could always add a page at
https://discourse.lubuntu.me/c/documentation/20
In summary; my install worked; except
- the third party packages however were not installed,
- the `/var/log/installer` directory did NOT exist thus some metadata was
missing from
Public bug reported:
full install to sony vaio thingy
- sony vaio ultrabook svp11216cgb (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
testcase: testcase: full, encryption, EFI, internet, swap, updates
no ethernet, so limited to wifi (300n so should be that bad, but still
aussie nbn so not fast)
---
This bug is LOW PRIORITY in my view...
- not many people will use the INSTALL USING EXISTING PARTITION
(non-destructive install)
- the error occurs which stops the installer, but most of what is required was
already done, so system has booted for me each time I've encountered this error
(even
Possibly obvious, but this appears on installed systems too, as I booted
up a recent install on dell optiplex 780 to get details for Aaron
yesterday & the 23.10 plymouth was there at boot/shutdown.
(d780 another box that uses text plymouth instead of graphic)
--
You received this bug
As requested by Aaron (matrix) I ran a command on dc7700 & reported
results... also booted & ran it on d780 (which I'm using now) and
results are rather slow.
guiverc@d780-noble:~$ time sudo update-initramfs -c -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-25-generic
repeated install (using existing partition) to
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
again this issue
The install abends (abnormal end) with error & thus doesn't
continue/complete install...
/var/log/installer/mediainfo OR all contents in
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2061698
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Of no importance.. but the 10 mins nothing will likely be
2024-04-16 - 12:32:43 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed /tmp/calamares-root-hazyaxmi/var/lib/snapd/seed krita")
2024-04-16 - 12:45:09 [6]: .. Running ("/bin/sh", "-c", "snap-seed-glue
--seed
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
** Description changed:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
Public bug reported:
This is NOT a bug that can be fixed with code.
At most a fix maybe a line in the release notes, that selecting all 3rd
party software for inclusion can be SLOW IF you're using 3rd-world, some
aussie NBN or other older/slower internet connections (or just
infrastructure at
I'll add another affirmation that what Asciiwolf reports in comment #10
is working for me too on this (my primary) install where I've not had
keyboard working for some time (see comment #4; late February 2024)
Add line & restart apparmor, and start torbrowser & I can use it for the
first time in
duplicate filing of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2061326
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061327
Public bug reported:
On this box (hp 8200) the text plymouth is used... and this it reports
as Lubuntu 23.10 during boot.
- hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600)
** expected result
On booting a Lubuntu noble beta (24.04) I expect it to say 24.04
** actual result
It reports
I've NOT encountered this issue with a install.alongside
(calamares/lubuntu) or the ubuntu-desktop-installer equivalent
(auto(resize) testcase)... as both installs (prior + new) appear in GRUB
on second install when that is run. This is where it matters most
anyway, and it works perfectly.
I've
The Xubuntu install was an install into one partition (SDA2) where two
partitions exist both with OSes (SDA1 & SDA2).
The resulting Xubuntu install booted without grub appearing on boot, and
no way for a user to boot into prior SDA1 install of Lubuntu noble.
Attempt as in original post of `sudo
The Xubuntu install was an install into one partition (SDA2) where two
partitions exist both with OSes (SDA1 & SDA2).
The resulting Xubuntu install booted without grub appearing on boot, and
no way for a user to boot into prior SDA1 install of Lubuntu noble.
Attempt as in original post of `sudo
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Examining the information you have given us, this does not appear to be
a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to a question in the
support tracker.
We understand the difficulties you are facing,
Just experienced this again..
Install to
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
this is a newer machine (2008) with faster cpu... alas still 'slow' by
todays standards...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I vaguely recall an indirect discussion with AndreaRighi (or someone)
who mentioned a (possible?) change coming thru for noble.. I'm wondering
if this is my discovery of what was mentioned.. alas I can't recall the
'comment' this reminds me of
My testing today can be read here -
Public bug reported:
Warning: os-prober will not be executed to detect other bootable partitions.
Lubuntu noble install to
- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
System had two Lubuntu noble installs on box; original full disk install (sda1)
+ install alongside
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1882411 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882411
** Attachment added: "screen.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2060614/+attachment/5762421/+files/screen.jpg
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1882411
lubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1882411 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882411
Public bug reported:
This really is a re-file of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-config/+bug/1882411
I've blamed OPENBOX here, quick play by switching to xfwm4 though... and
I could
On reboot of install, system looks good (I didn't bother checking for
the optional components given error..) but standard Lubuntu which even
had all updates applied!! was there...
EXCEPT no /var/log/installer/ or components; expected given calamares
abended with error
--
You received this bug
** Description changed:
Lubuntu full install to
- - dc7700
+ - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
- timeout (>600) seconds as I recall the message, and calamares fell over.
+ testcase: FULL, no-encryption, BIOS, internet, swap, updates
- I'll add more shortly..
Public bug reported:
Lubuntu full install to
- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 8gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
testcase: FULL, no-encryption, BIOS, internet, swap, updates
snap-seed-glue --seed /tmp/calamares-root-r00b_jf2/var/lib/snapd/seed
krita failed to finish in 600 seconds
I've had a
** Description changed:
- dc7700 install, error was like
+ install to
+ - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6230, 7gb, amd/ati rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
+ testcase: install using existing partition
- Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
- seconds.
+
+ Command
Public bug reported:
dc7700 install, error was like
Command /usr/libexec/fixconkeys-part2 failed to finish in 30
seconds.
(i clicked install at try/install & thus copy of error didn't survive
gui start)
this was NOT a clean install (no format) BUT a 'install using existing
partition'..
ie.
** Tags added: noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060409
Title:
Some slides in the Ubuntu MATE installer are no longer relevant
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2060375
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Install looks good to me.. HOWEVER
/var/log/media/installer shows Ubuntu 24.04 20240320.1 and not 20240328 which
is listed above..
some directory metadata (date/time stamps) are perfect and show an install only
mins ago... HOWEVER some show 28-March-2024 which better fit the 20.1 ISO..
thus
Public bug reported:
I've not yet looked at what happened, calamares just reported failure.
install on dc7700; using existing partition (single sda1), prior install
was Ubuntu Desktop booted ~15 mins prior to install... partitioning
was made by prior full-disk install
---
I tried to
As I noted in testcase comment
at terminal I killed lubuntu-installer-prompt & I had a normal LXQt
session appear...
At last resort (this issue maybe very rare; if its not transitory..) we
can document how to kill lubuntu-installer-prompt as I did on
discourse.. no need to mention in release
Public bug reported:
Booted Lubuntu noble daily on
- hp prodesk 400 g1 sff (i5-4570, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd
5000/6000/7350/8350)
Multiple attempts made, each end in black screens, with a small window
on one display titled "Lubuntu" and in the white window below it the
word "Connecting..."
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2059872
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Dan wrote
> (I never saw it work on UEFI)
guiverc@d7050-next:~/uwn/issues/831$ cat /var/log/installer/media-info
Xubuntu 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20230829)
I'm on my primary box now (dell optiplex 7050) which uses Secure-uEFI
boot, and this install was last made after a
I have zsync'd a Ubuntu Desktop ISO.. and attempted the same type of
install there
- Ubuntu Desktop noble ISO
- booted ISO, (0320 or 0320.1 I'm unsure sorry; whatever was current at time I
ran zsync)
- installer offered upgrade; so I accepted that.. closed & restarted install
- selected the
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) reached end-of-standard-support on May 31, 2023.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 2056581
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
I'll add for FYI sake.. I've experienced this myself on my primary box
(two weeks now); Lubuntu noble using LXQt/Xorg
I tried to re-create it using what was the Lubuntu current daily (this
was a few days ago now); and the torbrowser-launcher worked perfectly in
installing torbrowser for me to
requested delete via
https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/709435
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055270
Title:
Buy Tramadol Online At Lowest Prices
To manage
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
This is not an issue with Ubuntu, but with the mentioned Personal
Package Archive which the maintainer provides for Ubuntu 20.04 (focal)
and Ubuntu 22.04 (jammy)
The owner of the PPA decides what releases they'll
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1977678
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing
future users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Lubuntu has used sddm for all LXQt releases (ie. since Lubuntu 18.10),
and the upgrade from an release that used lightdm/LXDE is unsupported
due to breakage as was warned about in documentation, eg.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing
future users from hitting the same bug.
You may find a support site more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is mostly about finding & fixing problems thus preventing
future users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1976556
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1976475
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description
didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How
to report bugs effectively"
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1976473
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
The media used is not a Ubuntu ISO.
For this bug to be explored, an official Ubuntu ISO (eg. 20.04.4) would
need to be used, to rule out issues created by the unsupported (by
Ubuntu) third party ISO used in the initial filing.
I've marked this bug report invalid. If you believe this is a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 1976177
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.
Please note:
filed as #1959 upstream
(https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959) which was marked
duplicate of #1953 (https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1953)
I looked before filing, but missed it :(
** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1953
** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1959
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959
** Also affects: calamares via
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1959
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I can confirm this issue... (Lubuntu kinetic daily)
I worked around it via clicking Encrypt.system & entering password twice
& NEXT showed.. I could then unclick Encrypt to get what was wanted..
What Leó suggested (check/uncheck manual partitioning) is easier
- sony vaio svp112a1cw (i5-9400u,
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 21.04 (hirsute) reached end-of-life on January 20, 2022.
Ubuntu 20.10 (groovy) reached end-of-life on July 22, 2021.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be
> If you now apply the remedy to the stick
> dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=16 of=/dev/sdb conv=notrunc seek=462
>then i expect it to be permanently booting in reasonable time.
> .. Please confirm.
Inserted thumb-drive(2) [Ubuntu-MATE jammy] into box and
-- start paste
** Tags added: jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974268
Title:
Does this package conflict with systemd oom?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
-- reply to @Thomas #112 (start paste)
So if we want to propose a workaround for the current layout, it would be a
good base if you could confirm that j3400 boots after the plain procedure with
no other experiments inbetween:
# Patch the ISO already as image on hard disk
My thumb-drive K does not boot on
- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 5gb, nvidia quadro nvs 290)
- hp dc7900 (c2d-e8400, 4gb, intel 4 series integrated i915)
as it stands now.. (No big news as dc7700 & dc7900 usually react the same; but
confirmed it won't boot on dc7900)
Likely not required; but again
--
My thumb-drive K (what was used in #107 & #101) which contains Ubuntu
22.04 LTS (20220416) resulted in
PLEASE NOTE: I just noted the ISO date shows it wasn't the released
image.. It'll be the last daily/final/RC i actually used in testing...
I'd expect 20220419 for the released ISO. I don't
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.
Your log indicates you installed Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, are still using it
and haven't upgraded to a later release such as Ubuntu kinetic using
Ubuntu-release-upgrader. I've thus changed package to gnome-shell.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.
See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.
I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also
1 - 100 of 3831 matches
Mail list logo
