[Bug 850196] Re: euca-describe-images crashed with GetoptError in long_has_args(): option --owner-id not recognized

2011-09-19 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: euca2ools Assignee: (unassigned) = Mitch Garnaat (mitch-garnaat) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850196 Title: euca-describe-images crashed

[Bug 850196] Re: euca-describe-images crashed with GetoptError in long_has_args(): option --owner-id not recognized

2011-09-19 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: euca2ools Assignee: (unassigned) = Mitch Garnaat (mitch-garnaat) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850196 Title: euca-describe-images crashed with GetoptError in

[Bug 813295] Re: urlib.request fails to open Eucalyptus metadata service

2011-07-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813295 Title: urlib.request fails to open Eucalyptus metadata

[Bug 742443] Re: cc looses database information after restart

2011-05-02 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This is a UEC upstart init script related issue; marking as invalid against the eucalyptus upstream. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 742443] Re: cc looses database information after restart

2011-05-02 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This is a UEC upstart init script related issue; marking as invalid against the eucalyptus upstream. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 742443] Re: cc looses database information after restart

2011-04-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742443 Title: cc looses database information after

[Bug 742443] Re: cc looses database information after restart

2011-04-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742443 Title: cc looses database information after restart -- ubuntu

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I think I've found the problem all! So, looking at: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/isc-dhcp 1.) the patch I've supplied is being placed at the end of the '00list' file in debian/patches. not a problem normally i suspect, however: 2.) the patch is not present in the actual code that is being used

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I think I've found the problem all! So, looking at: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/isc-dhcp 1.) the patch I've supplied is being placed at the end of the '00list' file in debian/patches. not a problem normally i suspect, however: 2.) the patch is not present in the actual code that is being used

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
It turns out that I had(ve) apparmor disabled while working on this problem, but the new dhcpd needs a slight change to its profile in order to work. Here is what I saw with apparmor enabled: root@eucahost-4-243:/var/log/eucalyptus# dmesg [ 800.347860] type=1400 audit(1300832242.358:24):

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Carlos, This is the message that was being thrown when the original problem was cropping up; if you're still seeing this message with the patch installed, then it (the patch) is not working properly. The server should run even though there is no address in the config on the 10.55.55.0/24 subnet,

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Carlos, As a debugging aid, I've attached a stand-alone program that uses the same loop as the patch for dhcpd: running it on the CC right after a run-instances should result in output like this: root@eucahost-4-243:~# gcc getifaddrs.c; ./a.out INTERFACE=lo SCRUBBEDINTERFACE=lo ADDR=127.0.0.1

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
It turns out that I had(ve) apparmor disabled while working on this problem, but the new dhcpd needs a slight change to its profile in order to work. Here is what I saw with apparmor enabled: root@eucahost-4-243:/var/log/eucalyptus# dmesg [ 800.347860] type=1400 audit(1300832242.358:24):

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Carlos, This is the message that was being thrown when the original problem was cropping up; if you're still seeing this message with the patch installed, then it (the patch) is not working properly. The server should run even though there is no address in the config on the 10.55.55.0/24 subnet,

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Carlos, As a debugging aid, I've attached a stand-alone program that uses the same loop as the patch for dhcpd: running it on the CC right after a run-instances should result in output like this: root@eucahost-4-243:~# gcc getifaddrs.c; ./a.out INTERFACE=lo SCRUBBEDINTERFACE=lo ADDR=127.0.0.1

[Bug 731702] Re: euca-add-user adds a new disabled user, and there is no visible way to enable it

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731702 Title: euca-add-user adds a new

[Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 Title: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in

[Bug 523126] Re: Wrong CC IP address detected by eucalyptus-ipaddr.conf

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The part of the UEC that uses eucalyptus-ipaddr.conf is package specific, and so we'll mark it as invalid against the upstream system. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 476619] Re: Networking problem in Eucalyptus when VNET_PUBLICIPS has an IP being used in its range

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476619 Title: Networking problem in Eucalyptus when VNET_PUBLICIPS has an

[Bug 731702] Re: euca-add-user adds a new disabled user, and there is no visible way to enable it

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731702 Title: euca-add-user adds a new disabled user, and there

[Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 Title: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest

[Bug 523126] Re: Wrong CC IP address detected by eucalyptus-ipaddr.conf

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The part of the UEC that uses eucalyptus-ipaddr.conf is package specific, and so we'll mark it as invalid against the upstream system. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 476619] Re: Networking problem in Eucalyptus when VNET_PUBLICIPS has an IP being used in its range

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476619 Title: Networking problem in Eucalyptus when VNET_PUBLICIPS has an IP being used in

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, Thanks for this bug report, it does indeed appear that there is a bug in the new DHCP server that is preventing it from learning that some interfaces may have multiple IP addresses associated with them. Here is the result of my findings after looking at the dhcp server code for both dhcpd3

[Bug 724470] Re: apache2: symbol lookup error: /etc/eucalyptus/axis2/services/EucalyptusNC/libEucalyptusNC.so: undefined symbol: rampart_print_security_processed_results_set

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This looks like another gcc linker option ordering issue. revno 1256 of the eucalyptus branch contains a modified node/Makefile that should resolve the problem (tested as a clean compile on natty): root@ubuntu:~# ldd /usr/lib/axis2/services/EucalyptusNC/libEucalyptusNC.so

[Bug 724470] Re: apache2: symbol lookup error: /etc/eucalyptus/axis2/services/EucalyptusNC/libEucalyptusNC.so: undefined symbol: rampart_print_security_processed_results_set

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This looks like another gcc linker option ordering issue. revno 1256 of the eucalyptus branch contains a modified node/Makefile that should resolve the problem (tested as a clean compile on natty): root@ubuntu:~# ldd /usr/lib/axis2/services/EucalyptusNC/libEucalyptusNC.so

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-02-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus

[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty

2011-02-21 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Please see revno 1255 (latest) of Eucalyptus (lp:eucalyptus/2.0). That branch should resolve java and C compilation issues for Natty. The C compilation fix was twofold: re-arrange the gcc commandlines in various Makefiles to put system library link options after local object options (gcc *.c *.o

[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty

2011-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Please see revno 1255 (latest) of Eucalyptus (lp:eucalyptus/2.0). That branch should resolve java and C compilation issues for Natty. The C compilation fix was twofold: re-arrange the gcc commandlines in various Makefiles to put system library link options after local object options (gcc *.c *.o

[Bug 447034] Re: partition2disk error starting up an instance

2010-11-08 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Won't Fix = Invalid ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Dmitrii Zagorodnov (dmitrii) -- partition2disk error starting up an instance

[Bug 447034] Re: partition2disk error starting up an instance

2010-11-08 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Won't Fix = Invalid ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Dmitrii Zagorodnov (dmitrii) -- partition2disk error starting up an instance

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-10-23 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- euca-* commands stopped responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 639639] Re: euca-* commands stopped responding

2010-10-23 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- euca-* commands stopped responding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 566792] Re: metadata service returns empty data with 200 OK

2010-05-20 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Scott, thank you for pursuing this issue. Indeed, the meta-data service keys off of the public IP of the VM, since that is the only source address that is translated when the NCs cannot directly contact the CLC (MANAGED modes). In order for the meta-data service to work, the VM needs to be

[Bug 566792] Re: metadata service returns empty data with 200 OK

2010-05-20 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Scott, thank you for pursuing this issue. Indeed, the meta-data service keys off of the public IP of the VM, since that is the only source address that is translated when the NCs cannot directly contact the CLC (MANAGED modes). In order for the meta-data service to work, the VM needs to be

[Bug 566793] Re: euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent

2010-04-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The kvm driver, in the NC, was sending the first 64k of output. Fix is in revno 1224, which adds some lseek() logic to send back the last 64k of console output when getConsoleOutput() is invoked. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Fix Committed -- euca-get-console-output gives

[Bug 566793] Re: euca-get-console-output gives first 64k of output, not most recent

2010-04-22 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The kvm driver, in the NC, was sending the first 64k of output. Fix is in revno 1224, which adds some lseek() logic to send back the last 64k of console output when getConsoleOutput() is invoked. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Fix Committed -- euca-get-console-output gives

[Bug 567371] [NEW] NC does not detach created pthreads in KVM driver

2010-04-20 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: In the KVM NC driver, the pthread attr was set to detach a new pthread on create, but was not being passed to the pthread_create() function leading to the case where the NC will eventually be unable to start a new pthread. Fix is in revno 1223. ** Affects: eucalyptus

[Bug 567371] [NEW] NC does not detach created pthreads in KVM driver

2010-04-20 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: In the KVM NC driver, the pthread attr was set to detach a new pthread on create, but was not being passed to the pthread_create() function leading to the case where the NC will eventually be unable to start a new pthread. Fix is in revno 1223. ** Affects: eucalyptus

[Bug 461444] Re: memory leaks in NC: getConsoleOutput and startup_thread

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- memory leaks in NC: getConsoleOutput and startup_thread https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461444 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 552115] [NEW] node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: euca_conf has (had) a bug where node registration, if the NC and CC were running on the same machine, will fail if the host passed to --register- nodes is detected as being on the same machine. ** Affects: eucalyptus Importance: Low Assignee: Daniel Nurmi (nurmi

[Bug 552115] Re: node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
fixed in 1.6.2 revno 1220 -- node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 551778] Re: CCs or SCs cannot be deregistered

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Thierry, It looks as if this may be a documentation bug: --deregister-cluster and --deregister-sc takes the 'name' of the cluster, instead of the 'host' of the component. I just tested with using the cluster name in both cases, and de-registration is working. However, there are a few issues:

[Bug 461444] Re: memory leaks in NC: getConsoleOutput and startup_thread

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed -- memory leaks in NC: getConsoleOutput and startup_thread https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461444 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 552115] [NEW] node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: euca_conf has (had) a bug where node registration, if the NC and CC were running on the same machine, will fail if the host passed to --register- nodes is detected as being on the same machine. ** Affects: eucalyptus Importance: Low Assignee: Daniel Nurmi (nurmi

[Bug 552115] Re: node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Nurmi
fixed in 1.6.2 revno 1220 -- node registration fails if node is co-located with CC, and node hostname is detected as local https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 546293] Re: No instances started if euca-run-instance tries to run a number instances bigger than the limit (default 29) per security group

2010-03-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 546293] Re: euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group)

2010-03-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = Low -- euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546293 You received this bug notification

[Bug 546293] Re: No instances started if euca-run-instance tries to run a number instances bigger than the limit (default 29) per security group

2010-03-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) -- euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 546293] Re: euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group)

2010-03-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = Low -- euca-run-instances should fail if you try to run more instances than you can (in a single security group) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546293 You received this bug notification

[Bug 510086] Re: localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
We've modified the MASQ rule to use source !127.0.0.0/8, which resolves this problem (in Lucid) -- localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 457281] Re: Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: In Progress = Triaged -- Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 530091] Re: [alpha3] Re-registered NC fails to be detected.

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
It looks like the problem is related to the fact that euca_conf --deregister will de-register a node, but the uec_component_listener is not informed when de-registration happens. Thus, if the component listener is restarted, it will re-register the node as soon as it sees the avahi publication of

[Bug 510086] Re: localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
We've modified the MASQ rule to use source !127.0.0.0/8, which resolves this problem (in Lucid) -- localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 457281] Re: Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: In Progress = Triaged -- Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 530091] Re: [alpha3] Re-registered NC fails to be detected.

2010-03-24 Thread Daniel Nurmi
It looks like the problem is related to the fact that euca_conf --deregister will de-register a node, but the uec_component_listener is not informed when de-registration happens. Thus, if the component listener is restarted, it will re-register the node as soon as it sees the avahi publication of

[Bug 538546] Re: please move /etc/eucalyptus/cloud.d/scripts to /usr/lib/eucalyptus/cloud.d/scripts

2010-03-16 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Talked with Dustin, we're going to attempt to a.) back up old scripts/ to the backup directory b.) remove the old scripts/ c.) install new scripts in /usr/lib/eucalyptus/scripts/ d.) create softlink from /usr/lib/eucalyptus/scripts to /etc/eucalyptus/cloud.d -Dan -- please move

[Bug 538546] Re: please move /etc/eucalyptus/cloud.d/scripts to /usr/lib/eucalyptus/cloud.d/scripts

2010-03-16 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Talked with Dustin, we're going to attempt to a.) back up old scripts/ to the backup directory b.) remove the old scripts/ c.) install new scripts in /usr/lib/eucalyptus/scripts/ d.) create softlink from /usr/lib/eucalyptus/scripts to /etc/eucalyptus/cloud.d -Dan -- please move

[Bug 532938] [NEW] restarting the cloud controller while instances are pending causes incorrect address allocation state

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: if instances are pending (for example, if they fail to run on the NCs), and the cloud controller is restarted, public address state get be incorrect, resulting in the inability to run new instances: euca-run-instances $EMI -k mykey -n 4

[Bug 532938] [NEW] restarting the cloud controller while instances are pending causes incorrect address allocation state

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Public bug reported: if instances are pending (for example, if they fail to run on the NCs), and the cloud controller is restarted, public address state get be incorrect, resulting in the inability to run new instances: euca-run-instances $EMI -k mykey -n 4

[Bug 527648] Re: Running instances can't be contacted from CLC in CLC+Walrus / CC+SC / NC topology

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The upstream part of this fix (add VNET_CLOUDIP and VNET_LOCALIP to euca_conf --import-conf) is in revno 1202 -Dan ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel

[Bug 527648] Re: Running instances can't be contacted from CLC in CLC+Walrus / CC+SC / NC topology

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The upstream part of this fix (add VNET_CLOUDIP and VNET_LOCALIP to euca_conf --import-conf) is in revno 1202 -Dan ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel

[Bug 527648] Re: Running instances can't be contacted from CLC in CLC+Walrus / CC+SC / NC topology

2010-02-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
euca-authorize sets up a rule that is specific to a user/security group. For example, if you are using admin credentials and the group you're authorizing is 'default', then the rule will apply to all instances run by 'admin' in the group 'default'. If you acting as different user, say 'foobar',

[Bug 527648] Re: Running instances can't be contacted from CLC in CLC+Walrus / CC+SC / NC topology

2010-02-25 Thread Daniel Nurmi
euca-authorize sets up a rule that is specific to a user/security group. For example, if you are using admin credentials and the group you're authorizing is 'default', then the rule will apply to all instances run by 'admin' in the group 'default'. If you acting as different user, say 'foobar',

[Bug 520774] Re: Node not added to CLC even though registration is successful

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Since '--list-nodes' is not reporting '10.55.55.4' as registered, my guess is that the 'euca_conf --register-nodes 10.55.55.4' did not complete successfully. Can you check your nodes.list on the CC to see if '10.55.55.4' was added to the list? If so, then we should check to make sure the CC is

[Bug 520774] Re: Node not added to CLC even though registration is successful

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Since '--list-nodes' is not reporting '10.55.55.4' as registered, my guess is that the 'euca_conf --register-nodes 10.55.55.4' did not complete successfully. Can you check your nodes.list on the CC to see if '10.55.55.4' was added to the list? If so, then we should check to make sure the CC is

[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Some more context: if the eucalyptus DNS feature is disabled (as it is in the UEC, by default), then we cannot guarantee that the IP addresses that are specified by the administrator resolve to an actual hostname (as, often, users are choosing private/unroutable IP addresses for VMs). Inventing a

[Bug 457281] Re: Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This turns out to be a bit deeper of an issue than anticipated; we're using parted to create a partition/filesystem during image conversion time for KVM. parted currently does not support the creation of an ext3 partition using mkpartfs (and, since the partition is in the middle of the disk

[Bug 458203] Re: euca_conf is missing command-line completion

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, Chris has added a bash completion config for euca_conf as of revno 1138; take a look! -- euca_conf is missing command-line completion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This is really on the (we do our best to keep it)short-list of steps that one currently needs to perform in order to migrate images (to and from). Remember that images which are configured to run on xen will almost surely need some minor modifications (...kernel modules?) in order to boot

[Bug 510086] Re: localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I'm unable to reproduce this problem with (pre) Eucalyptus 1.6.2; with a running active CC in MANAGED mode (which has the masq rule in place), I can telnet to localhost port 22 (for example) without a problem, and sshing to localhost shows that I'm logged in from 'localhost' (implying that

[Bug 454519] Re: Public IP addresses should be assignable by DHCP

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, Mark, Dustin and I have discussed some ideas around the notion that having a more 'automated' method of choosing and allocating public IP addresses in the UEC, while keeping Eucalyptus in MANAGED mode in order to support all of the networking features that Eucalyptus provides (Elastic IPs,

[Bug 475354] Re: Hostname not set correctly on UEC cloud due to IP address in local-hostname manifest data

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Some more context: if the eucalyptus DNS feature is disabled (as it is in the UEC, by default), then we cannot guarantee that the IP addresses that are specified by the administrator resolve to an actual hostname (as, often, users are choosing private/unroutable IP addresses for VMs). Inventing a

[Bug 457281] Re: Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This turns out to be a bit deeper of an issue than anticipated; we're using parted to create a partition/filesystem during image conversion time for KVM. parted currently does not support the creation of an ext3 partition using mkpartfs (and, since the partition is in the middle of the disk

[Bug 458203] Re: euca_conf is missing command-line completion

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, Chris has added a bash completion config for euca_conf as of revno 1138; take a look! -- euca_conf is missing command-line completion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 457283] Re: x86_64 images should be presented a /dev/sdb, not a /dev/sda2

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
This is really on the (we do our best to keep it)short-list of steps that one currently needs to perform in order to migrate images (to and from). Remember that images which are configured to run on xen will almost surely need some minor modifications (...kernel modules?) in order to boot

[Bug 510086] Re: localhost connection timeouts after start of eucalyptus

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I'm unable to reproduce this problem with (pre) Eucalyptus 1.6.2; with a running active CC in MANAGED mode (which has the masq rule in place), I can telnet to localhost port 22 (for example) without a problem, and sshing to localhost shows that I'm logged in from 'localhost' (implying that

[Bug 454519] Re: Public IP addresses should be assignable by DHCP

2010-01-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, Mark, Dustin and I have discussed some ideas around the notion that having a more 'automated' method of choosing and allocating public IP addresses in the UEC, while keeping Eucalyptus in MANAGED mode in order to support all of the networking features that Eucalyptus provides (Elastic IPs,

[Bug 503180] Re: eucalyptus-cloud doesn't reply to requests

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Thank Thierry, We've finally been able to (we believe) reproduce this type of condition on our Lucid machines, and have figured out the reason why it is being triggered on lucid UEC installations. The Eucalyptus front-end components (cloud, walrus, sc) require that, on startup, the network

[Bug 503180] Re: eucalyptus-cloud doesn't reply to requests

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Thank Thierry, We've finally been able to (we believe) reproduce this type of condition on our Lucid machines, and have figured out the reason why it is being triggered on lucid UEC installations. The Eucalyptus front-end components (cloud, walrus, sc) require that, on startup, the network

[Bug 503180] Re: eucalyptus-cloud doesn't reply to requests

2010-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Greetings, We're having trouble reproducing this problem on our lucid systems against eucalyptus-cloud-1.6.2~bzr1124-0ubuntu3. We think that the issue is possibly related to some process startup behavior, but it would be great to get some more system information or a process by which the issue

[Bug 503180] Re: eucalyptus-cloud doesn't reply to requests

2010-01-15 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Greetings, We're having trouble reproducing this problem on our lucid systems against eucalyptus-cloud-1.6.2~bzr1124-0ubuntu3. We think that the issue is possibly related to some process startup behavior, but it would be great to get some more system information or a process by which the issue

[Bug 503599] Re: eucalyptus-nc: server reached MaxClients setting

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The node controller code currently can service at most one request from the CC at a time, and as such we set the MaxClients to 1 to ensure that apache does not send multiple requests to a single NC web service. The error message can safely be ignored! Regards, -Dan -- eucalyptus-nc: server

[Bug 503599] Re: eucalyptus-nc: server reached MaxClients setting

2010-01-05 Thread Daniel Nurmi
The node controller code currently can service at most one request from the CC at a time, and as such we set the MaxClients to 1 to ensure that apache does not send multiple requests to a single NC web service. The error message can safely be ignored! Regards, -Dan -- eucalyptus-nc: server

[Bug 460085] Re: Memory leaked per connection

2009-12-18 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I've been able to confirm that the newest euca/rampart packages, from proposed, are both functional and do not exhibit the memory leak. To be specific, i'm running with: eucalyptus-cc: 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 librampart0: 1.3.0-0ubuntu5.1 Thanks! -Dan -- Memory leaked per connection

[Bug 460085] Re: Memory leaked per connection

2009-12-18 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I've been able to confirm that the newest euca/rampart packages, from proposed, are both functional and do not exhibit the memory leak. To be specific, i'm running with: eucalyptus-cc: 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 librampart0: 1.3.0-0ubuntu5.1 Thanks! -Dan -- Memory leaked per connection

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-12-11 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I've verified that the upstream patch, on top of the patch we've provided, is both functional and does not exhibit the memory leak problem; the test was to run the CC/NC against patched rampart/c for approximately 18 hours, watching the memory footprint of the associated apache2 processes.

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-12-11 Thread Daniel Nurmi
All, I've verified that the upstream patch, on top of the patch we've provided, is both functional and does not exhibit the memory leak problem; the test was to run the CC/NC against patched rampart/c for approximately 18 hours, watching the memory footprint of the associated apache2 processes.

[Bug 454405] Re: the CC is returning incorrect networkIndex values on describeInstances

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Nurmi
To see the effect of this problem, the simplest setup is a multi-cluster installation (single clc, walrus, and two clusters (cc/sc) each with one node (nc)). Choose a security group (default is fine) and run one instance in one cluster, and one instance in the other cluster (this is controlled at

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Thierry, Shankar, Thank you both for following up on this issue and finding a potential patch to the memory leak issue in rampart; I'm testing the rampartc-1.3.0 with the above patch now with a long term eucalyptus test, and will report back when the test completes (we usually run for .5 day to

[Bug 454405] Re: the CC is returning incorrect networkIndex values on describeInstances

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Nurmi
To see the effect of this problem, the simplest setup is a multi-cluster installation (single clc, walrus, and two clusters (cc/sc) each with one node (nc)). Choose a security group (default is fine) and run one instance in one cluster, and one instance in the other cluster (this is controlled at

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Thierry, Shankar, Thank you both for following up on this issue and finding a potential patch to the memory leak issue in rampart; I'm testing the rampartc-1.3.0 with the above patch now with a long term eucalyptus test, and will report back when the test completes (we usually run for .5 day to

[Bug 473474] Re: non-default POWER_IDLETHRESH and POWER_WAKETHRESH don't actually work

2009-11-03 Thread Daniel Nurmi
300 seconds is the lowest value that can be set for both IDLE and WAKE; in your 'cc.log', you should see a warning; POWER_IDLETHRESH set too low (60 seconds), resetting to minimum (300 seconds) We're trying to be conservative, in order to avoid the condition where the CC starts putting nodes to

[Bug 460089] Re: network state is lost if the cluster controller (CC) is stopped

2009-10-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Network state refers to instance IP addresses and active security group rules (user defined instance network ingress policies). It is important to be able to maintain this state in the following scenario: Eucalyptus is up and running Users are running VMs and logging in/accessing them via the

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-10-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: New = Fix Committed -- memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 460089] Re: network state is lost if the cluster controller (CC) is stopped

2009-10-29 Thread Daniel Nurmi
Network state refers to instance IP addresses and active security group rules (user defined instance network ingress policies). It is important to be able to maintain this state in the following scenario: Eucalyptus is up and running Users are running VMs and logging in/accessing them via the

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = High -- memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Nurmi
the patch required a small patch to eucalyptus that initializes axis2c in the CC for each NC client connection (most already were handled this way, except to StartNetwork/RunInstances). in r946 -- memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

[Bug 460085] Re: memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection)

2009-10-26 Thread Daniel Nurmi
** Changed in: eucalyptus Importance: Undecided = High -- memory leak; rampart_context not freed (memory leaked per connection) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   >