[Bug 1851154] Re: libindicator ftbfs: G_ADD_PRIVATE

2019-11-08 Thread quequotion
I note this is the same problem indicator-messages had in bug 1843740. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851154 Title: libindicator ftbfs: G_ADD_PRIVATE To manage notifications about

[Bug 1851154] [NEW] libindicator ftbfs: G_ADD_PRIVATE

2019-11-03 Thread quequotion
Public bug reported: libindicator fails to build with this error: ../../libindicator/indicator-object.c: In function ‘indicator_object_init’: ../../libindicator/indicator-object.c:307:13: error: G_ADD_PRIVATE [-Werror] 307 | IndicatorObjectPrivate * priv = G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE (self,

[Bug 734908] Re: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps

2018-10-24 Thread quequotion
Comment #96 lists this bug as fixed in release 5.16.0-0ubuntu1, but I *know* that is not true. As Daniel has pointed out, the underlying issue is that Unity draws itself above all other windows in X11. Unless this behavior is changed--and it was not in 5.16.0-0ubuntu1--Unity will always be visible

[Bug 905441] Re: Compiz does not integrate well with the system colour scheme

2018-06-08 Thread quequotion
Oh how I wish it were possible to edit lauchpad comments... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905441 Title: Compiz does not integrate well with the system colour scheme To manage

[Bug 905441] Re: Compiz does not integrate well with the system colour scheme

2018-06-08 Thread quequotion
I found out what was breaking transparency, sort of; it was not related to this bug report. Still, for a while compiz was following my system color scheme for quite a while, until one day it went back to Ubuntu orange and purple and I've had to manually set colors ever since. -- You received

[Bug 905441] Re: Compiz does not integrate well with the system colour scheme

2018-04-06 Thread quequotion
Was this bug resolved? I ask because I find that compiz usually does follow the system color scheme lately, though I am at the moment experiencing a bug: the cube walls will not be transparent (despite transparent Wallpaper and cube) while at the same time all the compiz components are

[Bug 1195518] Re: Window focus wrong after minimizing

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
Sorry, that was meant to be "See bug 1574136" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 Title: Window focus wrong after minimizing To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 758253] Re: unity-compiz develops focus problems and sends input to minimized windows when 'Keep previews of minimized windows' is enabled

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1574136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574136 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1574136 Minimized window not loosing focus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 754065] Re: Minimized windows are invisible but present; minimize COMPLETELY BROKEN

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1574136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574136 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 758253 unity-compiz develops focus problems and sends input to minimized windows when 'Keep previews of minimized windows' is enabled ** This bug has been

[Bug 861184] Re: Minimize does not remove global-menu and restore from launcher broken

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 859867] Re: The maximization is not working well.

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 859885] Re: Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore)

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 Marking as duplicate of 1195518, since they have the same symptoms. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window focus wrong after minimizing -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 861093] Re: after minimising a window, it still has keyboard focus and its title and menu bar remain on the screen

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 859928] Re: Cannot unminimize the last active window by clicking launcher icon

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 861411] Re: minimized window leaves the titile bar words on panel

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 862325] Re: Unity cannot unminimize any window with one click

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 861651] Re: unable to relaunch a minimized window from launcher until another window is launched

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1195518 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 859885 Minimizing a window should switch focus to the windows underneath it (breaks restore) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1195518 Window

[Bug 1195518] Re: Window focus wrong after minimizing

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
Anyone affected by this bug should check if they have "Keep previews of minimized windows" enabled in the Workarounds plugin. See bug 859885; perhaps we can narrow this down. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1574136] Re: Minimized window not loosing focus

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
This may be the true nature of bug 1195518. We should check if people affected by it (or the many, many duplicates) have "Keep previews of minimized windows" enabled. This can probably be fixed in the Workarounds plugin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1195518] Re: Window focus wrong after minimizing

2018-04-02 Thread quequotion
>cmc302a YOu are correct, this bug was not fixed. In fact, not fixed in any version; ever. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195518 Title: Window focus wrong after minimizing To

[Bug 641479] Re: Surround Sound hisstles (hiss + whistle) when the volume is changed

2017-10-04 Thread quequotion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/445849/comments/258 >This issue is fixed since long ago. I'm inclined to believe that, though to be honest I simply got into the habit of avoiding changing pulseaudio's main volume. Does it matter if the fix is done in pulseaudio or the

[Bug 1415964] Re: Transparent background in gnome-system-monitor 3.14

2017-07-17 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1167079 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167079 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1167079 GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1367764] Re: Themes using overlay scrollbars have to set explicitly set backgrounds on all scrollable widgets

2017-07-17 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1167079 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167079 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1167079 GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1315659] Re: Some widget have black background

2017-07-17 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1167079 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167079 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1367764 Themes using overlay scrollbars have to set explicitly set backgrounds on all scrollable widgets ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Bug 1167079] Re: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar

2017-07-17 Thread quequotion
Bug 1367764, seems to have narrowed down the cause and come close to finding a solution. ** Description changed: When Ayatana overlay-scrollbar is enabled, GtkScrolledWindow widgets may be rendered without a background. Without composting these areas are black (openbox, gnome-shell) and

[Bug 1167079] Re: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar

2017-03-21 Thread quequotion
I note that in 2014 I had this problem with gtk 3.14 and Tim had it with 3.7.12. Was this working with gtk 3.6? Also, adding overlay-scrollbar (which actually causes the bug) and Ayatana Design (because I think the Ayatana overlay scrollbars should come back). I also like that that the overlay

[Bug 1167079] Re: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar

2017-03-21 Thread quequotion
** Also affects: ayatana-design Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167079 Title: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent

[Bug 1167079] Re: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar

2017-03-21 Thread quequotion
I've been using overlay-scrollbars, bzr revision 391 (last to include GTK3 scrollbars) in Archlinux for a while. I really prefer Ubuntu's design to Gnome's in the case of scrollbars. The Ayatana scrollbars allow for complete elimination of the trough and autohide when not in use. I also like that

[Bug 1167079] Re: GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar

2017-03-21 Thread quequotion
** Summary changed: - some GTK widgets have black backgrounds + GtkScrolledWindow widgets (GTK3) have black or transparent backgrounds with Ayatana overlay-scrollbar ** Description changed: - Some GTK widgets have a black background. So far I have noticed this - happening in g-c-c, gedit tab

[Bug 1623666] Re: iOS device contents not displayed in Ubuntu

2017-01-08 Thread quequotion
** Description changed: Plug in iOS device, and it doesn't show the documents on it. - Please package the recent fix in libimobiledevice: + Please package the recent fix in libimobiledevice*: + Vauge discussion that mentions using the latest git HEAD*:

[Bug 611590] Re: Brasero keeps on asking for libdvdcss.so.2

2016-10-29 Thread quequotion
Bringing in bug 1577268 as a duplicate (reported six years later than this one). Either my idea caught on or someone came to the same conclusion independently; the patch resolving this in xenial's version removes the version check completely (rather than just commenting it out). Not sure what's

[Bug 1577268] Re: Brasero can't find libdvdcss when going from Ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04

2016-10-29 Thread quequotion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 611590 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611590 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 611590 Brasero keeps on asking for libdvdcss.so.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1025535] Re: Unity with transparent desktop cube visible over full-screen applications

2016-10-22 Thread quequotion
>From bug 734908: >>vanvugt >It's impossible for an X app to draw on top of the Unity shell because the >Unity shell is part of Compiz and designed to always draw after app windows >(hence appears on top). This is something I have been waiting to hear for about five years-- confirmation and

[Bug 1248368] Re: Volume up/down keyboard keys stoped working after gnome-settings-daemon package update

2016-10-21 Thread quequotion
>Nazar Unfortunately not. That package could be recompiled for newer versions of Ubuntu, but the code itself is from gnome-settings-daemon 3.6.4 and will never be updated. It should really be released in it's own PPA, but I could never grasp debian packaging--it is more difficult to package

[Bug 30378] Re: Joystick activity does not stop the screensaver

2016-09-11 Thread quequotion
I think danellisuk's approach is interesting. I wonder if there is any "null" key they could be redirected to? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30378 Title: Joystick activity

[Bug 1248368] Re: Volume up/down keyboard keys stoped working after gnome-settings-daemon package update

2016-09-11 Thread quequotion
>Nazar Without Unity or Gnome-shell running, nothing is listening for the keys; you need gnome-fallback-media-keys-helper. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248368 Title: Volume

[Bug 734908] Re: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps

2016-07-20 Thread quequotion
I see.. So any idea why nothing has ever been able to draw on top of unity? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734908 Title: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps To manage

[Bug 734908] Re: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps

2016-07-19 Thread quequotion
Ages ago, someone decided that Unity would need to draw itself while using plugins like "desktop wall"... I suspect the solution they came up with was to draw Unity directly into X11's root window where nothing can ever be drawn on top of it. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1302885] Re: Media keyboard shortcuts not working

2016-07-19 Thread quequotion
No one ever answered my question (#32): How does unity work around gnome-settings-daemon dropping support for media keys? There does appear to be code in unity-settings-daemon for this:

[Bug 420583] Re: Notify-osd looks are not customizable

2016-07-15 Thread quequotion
I don't understand this code really: indicator-applet-developers/notify-osd/trunk/src/defaults.c gint defaults_get_on_screen_timeout (Defaults* self) { gint on_screen_timeout; if (!self || !IS_DEFAULTS (self)) return 0; g_object_get (self, "on-screen-timeout", _screen_timeout, NULL); return

[Bug 420583] Re: Notify-osd looks are not customizable

2016-07-15 Thread quequotion
Just digging around indicator-applet-developers/notify- osd/trunk/src/display.c /* if there is already one bubble on display we don't have room for another one */ if (bubble_is_visible (bubble)) return NULL; not great, but off topic. on topic: if (bubble_is_urgent (bubble)) { /* pick-up the

[Bug 420583] Re: Notify-osd looks are not customizable

2016-07-15 Thread quequotion
Use case: Ubuntu derivative/rebranding diversity. Derivatives might have different interest in notifications; ie some kind of kiosk distro could intentionally favor full screen, urgency=normal, as a default behavior while a multimedia desktop may want something like elementary's

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2016-07-15 Thread quequotion
>mpt Glad to see this bug is still bothering you, because it still bothers us. bug 420583's proposal great, and it's been sitting there for seven years. Seven years ago there was an idea that could probably have avoided all this trouble. Did the x time per n characters algorithm ever really

[Bug 420583] Re: Notify-osd looks are not customizable

2016-07-15 Thread quequotion
>Timeout settings: the time notifications stay should also be configurable: some people read faster than others, so the very-sensible default (of x time per n characters) can be good, but some people maybe like y time per n characters. That would be wonderful. Implement that; put a high priority

[Bug 611590] Re: Brasero keeps on asking for libdvdcss.so.2

2015-12-13 Thread quequotion
>Alister Hood Yes it does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611590 Title: Brasero keeps on asking for libdvdcss.so.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1220257] Re: openbox 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 package actually contains 3.5.0-1

2015-10-23 Thread quequotion
Did you package the other .desktop file? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1220257 Title: openbox 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 package actually contains 3.5.0-1 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 972077] Re: apt repository disk format has race conditions

2015-10-18 Thread quequotion
Is there any aspect of deb package management that isn't broken? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972077 Title: apt repository disk format has race conditions To manage notifications

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2015-10-13 Thread quequotion
However, it's the people *not* represented on launchpad that you're *even more* wrong about. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout

[Bug 918019] Re: Firefox does not use default application to open binary files

2015-10-13 Thread quequotion
Perhaps add this line would also be helpful: MimeType=application/octet-stream; -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918019 Title: Firefox does not use default application to open binary

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2015-10-13 Thread quequotion
>>mpt Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I don't understand your lexicon. I just think you're wrong. The group disproportionately represented on launchpad is not who you think it is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1423811] Re: 219-1ubuntu1 regression: boot hangs, logind fails

2015-10-11 Thread quequotion
I am very, very painfully going through this process right now. I REALLY need dpkg to stop trying to remove colord and network-manager (dependent on policykit-1). It would also help if Ubuntu Web Browser were a little more responsive.. Took 10 minutes to type this far probably unrelated...

[Bug 1504788] [NEW] aptitude is capable of suggesting solutions that do not include installing the specifically requested package

2015-10-10 Thread quequotion
Public bug reported: I came across this when trying to fix an installation (broken by "apt- get dist-upgrade") by reinstalling its desktop metapackage (which apt had removed, in order to remove its dependencies and install conflicting packages that were neither packages I requested or

[Bug 578928] Re: package libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135

2015-10-10 Thread quequotion
Five years later, no one--anywhere--has any idea what causes "Bus error" or why it ruins everything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578928 Title: package libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7

[Bug 558571] Re: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing

2015-10-10 Thread quequotion
Could someone explain to me what the &%$# I am doing here right now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558571 Title: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 558571] Re: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing

2015-10-10 Thread quequotion
This is a real problem. ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558571 Title: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing To manage notifications

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2015-09-27 Thread quequotion
** Also affects: ayatana-design Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter To manage

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2015-09-26 Thread quequotion
>People who look for, find, and comment in bug reports are disproportionately those who notice and are annoyed by software's current behavior. People who don't notice, don't care about, or agree with, current behavior don't go looking for bug reports about it. I strongly disagree. You aren't

[Bug 918019] Re: Firefox does not use default application to open binary files

2015-09-26 Thread quequotion
>Martinique That's a really good idea! This could solve mime association problems across the board. I made two slight modifications, one because I quit Ubuntu and the other is more important: [Desktop Entry] Name=Auto-select Exec=/usr/bin/xdg-open %U Terminal=false Type=Application

[Bug 611590] Re: Brasero keeps on asking for libdvdcss.so.2

2015-06-07 Thread quequotion
I have another solution for you. Like most of you I had libdvdcss installed but brasero refused to recognize it. It turns out brasero expects a somewhat specifc, outdated version of libdvdcss (possibly 1.2.0). I patched brasero to ignore the version of libdvdcss: http://pastie.org/10227736

[Bug 1446060] [NEW] package wine-mono0.0.8 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile 返回错误状态 2

2015-04-20 Thread quequotion
Public bug reported: Apport told me to do this; Ihave no idea... ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu Kylin 15.04 Package: wine-mono0.0.8 (not installed) Uname: Linux 3.19.0-pf3-00123-g9c4b8d9 i686 ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 20 14:50:59 2015

[Bug 1185502] Re: openbox.desktop has Type= XSession

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
This was handled incorrectly. There was already a bug report regarding the desktop file that was also handled incorrectly, bug 1220257 The real problem was that Ubuntu has been packaging an outdated version of openbox with an incorrect version number (this was actually 3.5.0; 3.5.2's .desktop

[Bug 1220257] Re: openbox 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 package actually contains 3.5.0-1

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
No, it wasn't. Furthermore, I see that in later packages of openbox the .desktop file has been removed completely. That was not the correct solution to any problem! This is the file you need: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/openbox/master/view/head:/data/openbox.desktop -- You

[Bug 1255783] Re: Desktop entry shows up in the startmenu

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
This was handled incorrectly. There was already a bug report regarding the desktop file that was also handled incorrectly, bug 1220257 The real problem was that Ubuntu has been packaging an outdated version of openbox with an incorrect version number (this was actually 3.5.0; 3.5.2's .desktop

[Bug 1220257] Re: openbox 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 package actually contains 3.5.0-1

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
The file made it into the source that saucy supposedly built from: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/openbox/saucy/view/head:/data/openbox.desktop But the openbox that actually gets packaged, and therefore the .desktop file as well, is 3.5.0. Here is the .deb on lauchpad:

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
mpt It's pretty clear that the majority opinion is to have this fixed by IMPLEMENTING the timeout parameter, not sweeping it under the rug. The #1 reason people end up here is looking for some way to make Notify- OSD's notifications go away faster. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1302885] Re: Media keyboard shortcuts not working

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
defaria I think you may have encountered what I was getting at in #32 GNOME has tied hotkey support into gnome-shell, such that hotkeys no longer work without gnome-shell in any gnome-derivative desktops (like Unity). The GNOME team has provided a utility to restore hotkey support without

[Bug 1423351] [NEW] Cease development and distribution of notify-osd

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
Public bug reported: Citing this tragedy: bug 390508 And this travesty: bug 533631 I fail to see a point in notify-osd's continued existence other than intentionally alienating developers and users. ** Affects: libnotify (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description

[Bug 1220257] Re: openbox 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 package actually contains 3.5.0-1

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
Looking over the build logs of every openbox package since 3.5.0-8, it seems as though the correct source code was used to build all of the 3.5.2 packages, yet they all have the 3.5.0 .desktop or none at all. There's a patch in the 3.5.2-0ubuntu1 debian packaging,

[Bug 1185502] Re: openbox.desktop has Type= XSession

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
Maybe just the .desktop file is outdated. Ubuntu has been packaging data/gnome-wm-properties/openbox.desktop but the correct file is data/openbox.desktop The other file should be removed from the source tree, but it's probably been forgotten. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1255783] Re: Desktop entry shows up in the startmenu

2015-02-18 Thread quequotion
Maybe just the .desktop file is outdated. Ubuntu has been packaging data/gnome-wm-properties/openbox.desktop but the correct file is data/openbox.desktop The other file should be removed from the source tree, but it's probably been forgotten. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1248368] Re: Volume up/down keyboard keys stoped working after gnome-settings-daemon package update

2015-01-22 Thread quequotion
The most likely cause of this is that gnome-settings-daemon no longer supports media keys. You can restore functionality with gnome-fallback-media-keys-helper, but it's only packaged for Zorin OS: https://launchpad.net/~zorin- os/+archive/ubuntu/packages/+sourcepub/3778150/+listing-archive-extra

[Bug 1302885] Re: Media keyboard shortcuts not working

2015-01-22 Thread quequotion
or has that change not hit Ubuntu yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302885 Title: Media keyboard shortcuts not working To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1302885] Re: Media keyboard shortcuts not working

2015-01-22 Thread quequotion
How does unity work around gnome-settings-daemon dropping support for media keys? Does unity handle these keys itself now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302885 Title: Media

[Bug 931929] Re: Installation on RAID or LVM fails to boot

2015-01-05 Thread quequotion
** Summary changed: - root on RAID:0 fails to boot + Installation on RAID or LVM fails to boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931929 Title: Installation on RAID or LVM fails to boot

[Bug 734908] Re: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps

2015-01-04 Thread quequotion
** Changed in: ayatana-design Status: Fix Committed = Opinion ** Changed in: ayatana-design Status: Opinion = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734908 Title:

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2014-08-29 Thread quequotion
duncan bayne The bug isn't in notify-send; this is part of libnotify which properly implements the timeout specification (you can send the timeout parameter). The problem is in notify-osd (Canonical's notification front-end) which does not properly implement the timeout specification (it will

[Bug 734908] Re: Unity is visible on top of fullscreen apps

2014-08-29 Thread quequotion
Have I mentioned before that I think this is a layering problem? I was reading the old xscreensaver (one of many things unity appears on top of) faq and came a across this: __ Every few minutes, xscreensaver will raise itself above

[Bug 328572] Re: Connecting/disconnecting notification changes

2014-08-13 Thread quequotion
Ubuntu still carries this patch (and two more just like it) as of Utopic. Was upstream ever contacted? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328572 Title: Connecting/disconnecting

[Bug 767040]

2014-08-12 Thread Quequotion-7
Almost a year since the last post, using firefox 30; no overlay- scrollbars :( Was there any more progress on this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767040 Title: Firefox

[Bug 1270422] Re: gstreamer1.0 can't load plugins; all gstreamer applications broken

2014-06-12 Thread quequotion
Sorry, I ended up changing linux distributions before coming back to check on this bug. Not having any trouble with gstreamer1.0 or gstreamer applications in Archlinux! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2014-06-12 Thread quequotion
there's also the fact that lacking support for the timeout parameter allows for notifications that do not reliably disappear, ever. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title:

[Bug 1226430] Re: /usr/sbin/unity-greeter: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libido3-0.1.so.0: undefined symbol: ubuntu_menu_item_factory_get_type

2014-05-05 Thread quequotion
Exactly which package provides the symbol ubuntu_menu_item_factory_get_type? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226430 Title: /usr/sbin/unity-greeter: symbol lookup error:

[Bug 1039476] Re: gtk_menu_new_from_model doesn't support custom menu items

2014-04-03 Thread quequotion
I'm trying to reconcile the ubuntu gtk3 patches from bzr against gtk3 from git and I've almost got it. I'm stuck on this one, since GMenuModel (gtkmodelmenu?) is deprecated for GtkMenuTracker https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=5617b584202b1f967f287dfd03a4560975f1389b I've worked out

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2014-03-26 Thread quequotion
Besides, the documentation contradicting Ubuntu's implementation at freedesktop.org isn't outdated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390508 Title: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2014-03-26 Thread quequotion
The people trying to figure out why notifications linger at the top of the screen for way too long and cause new notifications to come in late and pile up in a chain that can go on for several minutes are not reading outdated documentation; they are trying to figure out what is wrong with this

[Bug 733349] Re: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon

2014-03-25 Thread quequotion
Townsend First, thank you for doing the right thing. I haven't tried this feature yet, since I'm still not using Unity (or even Ubuntu anymore) and I have a question: does this feature distinguish between focused (to be minimized) and unfocused (to be focused) state? -- You received this bug

[Bug 733349] Re: Minimize Application's Windows upon clicking its Launcher Icon

2014-03-25 Thread quequotion
This is the code I asked about: === modified file 'launcher/ApplicationLauncherIcon.cpp' --- launcher/ApplicationLauncherIcon.cpp2014-03-12 23:46:10 + +++ launcher/ApplicationLauncherIcon.cpp2014-03-17 20:58:25 + @@ -399,7 +399,16 @@ { if (arg.source !=

[Bug 390508] Re: notifyOSD ignores the expire timeout parameter

2014-03-07 Thread quequotion
No longer affects notify-osd? When is someone with the authority and the ability going to wake up and realize that this bug needs to be fixed, and the way to fix it is to implement the expire_timeout parameter as specified. There are plenty of specific cases pointed out in this report of users

[Bug 1103747] Re: Totem could not startup.

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
Same problem after upgrade to 13.10 but none of the proposed solutions work. Deleting the gstreamer cache only gives me an extra error about setting GST_PLUGIN_SCANNER This is the output I usually get from totem (don't worry about the theme warnings): :~$ totem (totem:28893): Gtk-WARNING **:

[Bug 1270422] [NEW] gstreamer1.0 can't load plugins; all gstreamer applications broken

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
Public bug reported: Although all plugins (-base, -good, -bad, -ugly, and some others) are installed, gst-inspect-1.0 only shows: :~$ gst-inspect-1.0 coreelements: valve: Valve element coreelements: multiqueue: MultiQueue coreelements: typefind: TypeFind coreelements: tee: Tee pipe fitting

[Bug 1270422] Re: gstreamer1.0 can't load plugins; all gstreamer applications broken

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
I need a solution that doesn't involve reinstalling the entire operating system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270422 Title: gstreamer1.0 can't load plugins; all gstreamer

[Bug 1072151] Re: Cannot burn audio CDs with mp3 files provided

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
When will this patch be applied to future versions of brasero (ie, 3.8, which still has this problem)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072151 Title: Cannot burn audio CDs with mp3

[Bug 1228360] Re: No clock in menu bar and can't edit Clock settings

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
Alberto Salvia Novella Do not change bug status without verification. This bug has not been fixed anywhere. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228360 Title: No clock in menu bar and

[Bug 983535] Re: libdvdread: Can't seek to block XXXXX

2014-01-18 Thread quequotion
One more thing that was broken after upgrading to Saucy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983535 Title: libdvdread: Can't seek to block X To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1242390] Re: ac-53 (a52 plugin) core dumps

2014-01-17 Thread quequotion
#4 #5 This is unlikely to be the cause of the problem. It looks like pulseaudio attempts all possible configurations for devices when loading them to find out which ones work. I've noticed that I get the same floating point exception when attempting to use the a52 plugin without pulseaudio

[Bug 1241439] Re: [a52 plugin] no sound/audio, traps: pulseaudio[25921] trap divide error ip:7fe46a303a57 sp:7fff825b91d0 error:0 in libavutil.so.51.22.1

2014-01-17 Thread quequotion
sp:7fff94bff400 error:0 in libavutil.so.51.22.1[7fde05ee9000+1c000] Could this mean the error originates in libavutil or that something else caused an error in libavutil? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1242390] Re: ac-53 (a52 plugin) core dumps

2014-01-17 Thread quequotion
Here's what gdb has to say about that core dump: Core was generated by `speaker-test -Da52:CARD=PCH -c6'. Program terminated with signal 8, Arithmetic exception. #0 0x7fb3cef10a57 in av_samples_get_buffer_size () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavutil.so.51 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1242390] Re: ac-53 (a52 plugin) core dumps

2014-01-17 Thread quequotion
core dump generated by `speaker-test -Da52:CARD=PCH -c6' ** Attachment added: core dump https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1242390/+attachment/3951054/+files/speaker-test.core -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1228360] Re: No clock in menu bar and can't edit Clock settings

2014-01-16 Thread quequotion
What happened to /usr/lib/indicators3/7/libdatetime.so et al? These libraries are missing from several of saucy's indicator-* packages. Take a look: http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/indicator-datetime/filelist http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/amd64/indicator-datetime/filelist

[Bug 1241439] Re: [a52 plugin] no sound/audio, traps: pulseaudio[25921] trap divide error ip:7fe46a303a57 sp:7fff825b91d0 error:0 in libavutil.so.51.22.1

2014-01-14 Thread quequotion
Is this bug different from bug 1242390? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241439 Title: [a52 plugin] no sound/audio, traps: pulseaudio[25921] trap divide error ip:7fe46a303a57

  1   2   3   4   >