[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-04-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcal (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-03-07 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
Given that the package is quite abandoned, the changes look good to me (as long as you forward the debdiff to Debian -in a bug, not in a private mail to the Maintainer-), except one of them: don't change the debhelper level to 6, but instead to 4 or 5 (to make backports easier). Daniel, are you

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-03-07 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
(Unsubscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors for now and subscribing Daniel and me.) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-26 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcal (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-25 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) (rainct) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gcal - 3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1 --- gcal (3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Rebuild to fix segfault on amd64 (LP: #102373) * Change quoting of CFLAGS, to prevent FTBFS with latest dpkg version * Correct lintian warnings: - Escape minus signs

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-25 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
Uploaded (after changing compat level to 4). Thanks! ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-25 Thread albert
The patch has been forwarded to Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365 Also, please note gcal was orphaned in Debian 10 days ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465930 -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-25 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Also affects: gcal (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-24 Thread Daniel Holbach
Looks good. Go ahead and upload! :-) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-18 Thread Daniel Holbach
Why is the new debhelper version necessary? Also you introduce quite a lot of other changes over the Debian package, which need to be merged manually. All these changes would only make sense if they go to Debian too. -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-18 Thread albert
Considering the very low update frequency from debian and the guidelines given here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg256671.html it seemed good to me to give the package a full uplift, including the debhelper and standards-version bump. In my opinion the chance we would need to

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-17 Thread albert
Sponsor, can you please sponsor this update for gcal? gcal has given segfaults on amd64 since dapper, and has not been rebuilt since 2005. Last week a rebuild solved the problem, but now a change in the CFLAGS setting is required to build with the latest dpkg version. Since a change is needed

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-17 Thread albert
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Assignee: albert (albrt) = (unassigned) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2008-02-04 Thread albert
The problem is still present in Hardy on amd64. A rebuild fixes the problem, but the package needs a little more work. ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = albert (albrt) Status: New = In Progress -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2007-10-23 Thread Matt C
gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy. ** Attachment added: _usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2007-10-23 Thread Jeff Bralley
Yes, for me too on amd64. I have attached gcal.[sl]trace On Tuesday 23 October 2007 01:59:39 pm Matt C wrote: gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy. ** Attachment added: _usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash -- Jeff Bralley 251-599-1259 CST

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2007-10-06 Thread jclemon
gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2007-10-06 Thread Jeff Bralley
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:12:33 am jclemon wrote: gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta Yes it is. Thanks. -- Jeff Bralley 251-599-1259 CST Mobile,AL,USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bralley.networklight.net/ http://bralley.com/ !Increase the Dosage! -- gcal

[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.

2007-08-02 Thread jclemon
** Summary changed: - gcal failed with a segnentation fault. + gcal failed with a segmentation fault. -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.