** Tags added: regression-potential
** Summary changed:
- oprofile is linked against non-shipping version of libbfd
+ oprofile does not run in karmic (linked against non-shipping version of
libbfd)
--
oprofile does not run in karmic (linked against non-shipping version of libbfd)
I don't know a lot about this, but everything I've read in the last 15
minutes suggests that nothing should be linked dynamically toe libbfd
(it's stated in the package info for binutils-dev, for example), but
that it's rather easy to wind up with this on accident: http://www.mail-
Indeed. Ubuntu actually has a patch that isn’t in Debian to link libbfd
dynamically. Let’s get rid of that.
** Attachment added: oprofile_0.9.4+cvs20090629-2.1ubuntu2_lp426614.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33456355/oprofile_0.9.4%2Bcvs20090629-2.1ubuntu2_lp426614.debdiff
--
Same problem with this version:
Package: oprofile
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.9.4+cvs20090629-2.1ubuntu1
$ opreport
opreport: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.19.91.20090910.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
** Changed in: oprofile (Ubuntu)
Same problem again on karmic amd64:
$ opreport
opreport: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.19.91.20090910.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
$ ls /usr/lib/libbfd*
/usr/lib/libbfd-2.19.91.20090923.so /usr/lib/libbfd.a /usr/lib/libbfd.so
$ dpkg-query -W
fixed in oprofile_0.9.4+cvs20090629-2.1ubuntu1
** Changed in: oprofile (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
oprofile is linked against non-shipping version of libbfd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426614
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: oprofile (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: oprofile (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
oprofile is linked against non-shipping version of libbfd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426614
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
