On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:10:44AM +, Jarkko Korpi wrote:
> Now the issue. Oipaf doesnt provide llvm 3.7 compiled packages so I could
> have more recent opengl extensions because
>
> "When Ubuntu will provide an llvm that properly build on i386."
I'm not familiar with the details, but it
ec 2015 13:29:36 +
From: Jarkko Korpi <jarkko_ko...@hotmail.com>
To: Robie Basak <robie.ba...@ubuntu.com>
Subject: RE: llvm 3.7 broken in mint because upstream
I don't really understand this 64bit/32bit thing. Even you have 64bit linux,
you need 32bit libraries to get things workin
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:08:44PM +, J Fernyhough wrote:
> Taking an educated guess and trying to answer the real question, given
> Cacti had a security update very recently: the Cacti package in Ubuntu
> is in 'universe' [1]. This means Ubuntu won't necessarily provide
> updates, even for
Hi Sanford,
If your goal is to get this packaged in Ubuntu, then the recommended
route to doing that currently is by getting it packaged in Debian. And
for that, there's the debian-legal list[1] that might help you get
Debian's opinion on the legal question involved here.
But, as always,
* rbasak listed areas that he thinks needs looking at before Xenial
feature freeze on 18 Feb. hallyn pointed out that this should be in a
blueprint, so rbasak agreed to take an action to create one. Some
work item assignments were made for the blueprint.
* No other discussion was
"Only the single favorite choice will win the poll."
Is that right? Or are we voting for a set of seats? Where can I find out
who currently has a seat and how many seats there are? The Restaffing
wiki page doesn't seem to say, and nor does the main CommunityCouncil
wiki page.
Robie
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:06:34AM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 10/23/2015 10:45 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> > (This is for an unconfined app - I think some changes will be needed to
> > the AppArmor profile definitions to make it work confined - for example
> > p
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:45:49AM -0500, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:
> Shouldn’t there be a way for Launchpad’s translation focus to change
> automatically? As the change depends on some people with admin status,
> the neglect is visible, as it has been for a couple of years now.
Or in the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:51:11AM +0800, Gareth wrote:
> the same package from different (but related) repo has different
> dependencies. One is '(= 5.5.35+dfsg-1ubuntu1)' and another is '(=
> 5.5.44-0ubuntu0.14.04.1)'. The first on from trusty and breaks in
> installation if I don't set ddebs'
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:32:05AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I don't care much about this package, but wish to know, if there is
a file or webpage that mentions all Debian/Ubuntu patches included to a
package, with a short explanation what those patches are for,
including hints to perhaps
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:19:36PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
JFTR even if there wouldn't be the explained reason to build with the
Arch config, then building a vanilla rt-patched kernel from kernel.org
without Ubuntu patches still provides a kernel that is absolutely
optimised for audio
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 01:06:12AM -0300, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Hey guys,
Any plans to package Intel DPDK for Ubuntu?
Also, what about integrating Open vSwitch with DPDK (after package ready)?
We're looking into this. One of us will probably file an ITP. Some
packaging work in progress
The meeting was very short with little that needed discussion.
* matsubara will be performing SRU verification on bug 1443735
recordfail false positive causes headless servers to hang on boot by
default.
* The ODS for Tokyo submission is open.
* No meeting actions were assigned.
*
I'm sorry I haven't yet properly replied to this.
I have two general comments. First, a user wrote up his concerns about
the move to biosdevname here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1347859 which
might still be relevant. One thing we should do based on that is to
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 01:42:34PM -0500, Andrew Martin wrote:
...however some major bugs
have
been found that I think satisfy one of the When conditions. For example, I
discovered a bug that would cause the on-disk XML for a VM defined by
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:06:18PM +0200, astavroula...@os3.nl wrote:
In the home directory, there is user information such as photos, music etc
in the directories Documents, Downloads, Music, Pictures, Videos.
However, I can't find, for example, actual SMS messages stored there, or
the
Hi Martin,
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 07:27:39AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Proposal
I propose to retire [mac], i. e. drop
/lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules and enable
[ifnames] by default on all platforms (client, server, touch, snappy),
and stop installing
Hi Craig,
Thank you for volunteering your time to improve lockdev.
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:01:58AM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote:
I see that liblockdev1-dev doesn't install a pkg-config lockdev.pc
file for the library. It would be helpful to add a lockdev.pc so other
programs can more easily
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:36:09PM -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
I'm just wondering if there are any plans to revisit btrfs as the default
filesystem before the next LTS?
Is it really ready yet? For example, CoreOS reported having issues and
switched away in December/January:
Review ACTION points from previous meeting
The discussion about Review ACTION points from previous meeting
started at 16:00.
* dannf will look at bug 1427406 data corruption on arm64 soon
* Bug 1432715 tomcat7 ftbfs in vivd (test failures) is waiting on a
fix in Debian
* hallyn has
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:53:34PM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Any chances to see the latest SSSD (1.12.4) version for Vivid?
Feature freeze was yesterday, so sorry, it's too late for an update in
the schedule now. It'll need to wait for Vivid+1. Unless someone wants
to drive analysing the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:18:26AM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
So I take it that means the chances are slim to none? :)
Feature freeze is tomorrow. I don't have time to look at it myself -
sorry - and I suspect many others are in the same boat.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:27:14PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Perhaps Go and the redepends should be removed from the archive then?
There does seem to be a fundamental dissonance between upstream's policy
and Ubuntu's policies here. With upstream not maintaining bugfix only
branches; instead
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 01:40:54PM +, Bernie wrote:
Upgrades simply should NOT do this, they should only upgrade programs which
are already installed.
[...]
Policy changes as to which applications are installed should only happen in
new releases.
Indeed this is the policy. See [1] for
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that libnss-ldap was no longer maintained upstream* (and has
a good amount of bugs) and has good replacements available (sssd, but
libnss-ldap*d* also works) so I thought it might be a good candidate
to move out of
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:59:24AM -0400, Seth Arnold wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:51:56PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
Historically, ntpd would refuse to change the system time beyond a small
amount, so ntpdate was run in the initscripts for ntpd to make sure that
ntpd could keep things
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:17:33PM -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
Out of curiosity, why ntpd/ntpdate instead of chrony? Chrony is
designed to work well on both mobile systems and servers. As I
understand, it's also the default of current Fedora and RHEL 7.
Having chrony default on
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:01:07PM +0100, Vincent schurink wrote:
It appears that the last security / bugfix update on the precise package was
the first of April 2013.
In particular our application was found vulnerable to the following CVE's:
Important: Session fixation
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:51:04AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
The libcairo2 version in trusty contains a nasty bug that will crash webkit
base browser when playing videos (see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81699)
Could
I'd like to seed ntp in both server and cloud-image in Vivid. Servers
should maintain the correct time by default. Please make any objections
now.
Right now, ntpdate is seeded in minimal. It makes little sense to have
both ntpdate and ntp installed.
So is there some mechanism I can use to have
I should add some more related links:
Debian making NTP happen by default too is being discussed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731594. openntpd was
suggested, but this effort seems to have languished, and in Ubuntu we
have ntp in main, not openntpd.
An ntpdate issue in
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:10:05AM -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Could we just switch everything over to ntp? Is their a downside to
this I'm missing?
Desktop machines may not be online all the time. In this case, ntp won't
really work very well, and it might be better just to sync the time when
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:45:52PM +0200, m-stl...@use.startmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding Virtualbox in Ubuntu
In the software-center the virtualbox package has unknow as license.
Why has virtualbox been switched from universe to multiverse? I see
virtualbox in distro
94 items at start, 68 when done, though I think others must have been
working through the queue at the same time since that definitely wasn't
all me.
That's most of what was in the red for unseeded packages looked at. I
skipped the GL/GLES armhf stuff since I'm not familiar enough and cannot
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Oli Warner wrote:
But PHP upgrades also have backwards incompatibilities so SRUing them
through is haphazard.
Right. Our users don't expect PHP to break for them in the middle of a
stable release, so we can't SRU newer releases wholesale. Then at least
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
Yes, like most packages in Ubuntu, the security team backports security fixes,
including for versions that are no longer supported by upstream.
Oops. That's so much of a given for me that I didn't even consider that
security
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:31:03PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
If you maintain a package which already is in git in Debian, I warmly
recommend that instead, as locally maintained git branches/patches
tend to get lost or outdated.
Absolutely. If everything is already in git and logically
I thought it was about time that I shared my own merge workflow, as I
think it is quite different from most other Ubuntu developers. I'm an
advanced git user (even a fanatic, perhaps), and I make extensive use of
git's interactive rebase feature. To me, an Ubuntu package merge is just
a rebase in
U Development
The discussion about U Development started at 16:00.
* Feature freeze is August 21. Note Debian Import Freeze is coming up
as well.
* The mysql /var/lib/mysql discussion is proceeding, but it seems
unlikely that this will happen by feature freeze now. Nevertheless,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:14:48AM -0500, Alexander Trauzzi wrote:
Despite that, I'm hoping that somehow we can break this cycle/pattern and
have the two sides come together for the sake of any who want the latest
greatest C# on Ubuntu.
I wish you the best in getting better support on Ubuntu.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:36:21AM -0500, Alexander Trauzzi wrote:
Well would you look at that:
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2014-June/041658.html
That's great news! Thanks for putting it all together :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Alexander,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:31:09AM -0500, Alexander Trauzzi wrote:
So, be it resolved that the current options for Mono are just not cutting
it, I'd like to propose that a PPA or appropriate equivalent be made or an
existing official PPA be reworked to meet the following criteria:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
AIUI, there are security implications for raising this limit system-wide
by default, since applications that use select() are often broken and
will become vulnerable with a higher limit.
See
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives
AIUI, there are security implications for raising this limit system-wide
by default, since applications that use select() are often broken and
will become vulnerable with a higher limit.
See
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-September/031446.html
for the previous discussion.
https://code.launchpad.net/~chris-good/ubuntu/trusty/netkit-rwall/fix-for-1277981/+merge/216563
already reviewed by mitya57, awaiting response.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netkit-rwall/+bug/1277981 -
duplicate, unsubscribed.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:53:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
This is not the way to fix issues. You are only hiding the issue
and hoping that it won't be your responsibility to fix it properly. I
kindly remind you at the mysql-5.5 fix to fall back to an earlier
GCC version and blocking
This will probably want the attention of the kernel team for a reply, so
forwarding there. Is there maybe a security reason why it is arranged
this way? I note that System.map is the same.
---BeginMessage---
permissions on /boot/vmlinuz are 0600, preventing userspace utilities
like virt-builder in
Any comments from the Ubuntu side of things, please? Replies should
probably go to the cross-distro list, I guess. The thread is at:
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/cross-distro/2014-May/000676.html
Robie
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
I've collected a list of where people install their dtb files
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:42:52AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
It might be better to flip the logic around and assume most user
applications are brittle - refuse to update unless all the user
applications running have marked themselves as being update
ready/update aware.
This puts the user
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:45:10PM +0200, ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.nk7.net
wrote:
Is there any specific reason why lucene-fts plugin is not included
in the package?
It looks like this was fixed in Debian on 10 March, and Ubuntu's feature
freeze for Trusty had already passed on 20 Feb, so
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Tim Heckman wrote:
However, it looks like the Packages file for lucid-security hasn't
been updated to provide the newer package 'linux-ec2':
-
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2
linux-ec2 is a
Tamas,
You can see the reason for the change in the bug linked in the patch
header marked Bug-Ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1071817
HTH,
Robie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
A few last pieces are being worked in the last couple of days to final
freeze.
* James Page is struggling to find a release team member to review the
docker.io feature freeze exception request (bug 1295093).
* The juju-quickstart MIR is deferred; Robie will upload some final
bugfixes
I only managed four uploads today. Each item needed a little more depth in some
way, so I ran out of time.
https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/trusty/open-vm-tools/lp1289564/+merge/210037
Looked good, but couldn't upload. Emailed DMB, permission obtained, and
uploaded.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:48:52PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote:
We've had a lot of internal Canonical discussions about our networking
story and before going to a UDS session [1] it was suggested to post to
ubuntu-devel.
*Network Restart*
I'd like to start by asking each of you what you
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:32:17PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Why was it necessary to have discussions internally when they could
have been open by default?
(wearing both my Canonical and Ubuntu hats)
Are Canonical employees not allowed to speak to each other now? I think
you're being
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:41PM +0100, Stanisław Hodur wrote:
If talking about the network, I would add:
*Wifi + Ethernet on Desktop*
The network gets lost if you have both wireless and Ethernet connection.
The wired network should be the preferred one, as it is usually
faster. Or else,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:44:07PM -0800, Dale Amon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:41PM +0100, Stanisław Hodur wrote:
*Wifi + Ethernet on Desktop*
Which reminds me of another common use of machines that a typical
GUI user won't think of.
I often configure laptops that for security
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 09:03:17AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote:
Fair. However, the 40M of space *is* permanent waste.
In addition, we're promoting doing things in containers more and more -
particularly in server deployments. The 40M gets multiplied by the
number of containers you have on a
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:45:44PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
Unless somebody steps up to maintain xen-api, I don't think it makes
sense to continue keeping these packages in Ubuntu, given that Debian
have removed them from testing and the existing packages broken (and, it
seems, thus stuck
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:23:12PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
Debian has removed xen-api/xen-api-libs from testing and were thinking about
removing it completely from Sid as nobody cared about it. Citrix is working on
some overhaul but have not come forward with something usable, yet.
When
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:53:06PM -0500, John Moser wrote:
Well, they have a large amount of stuff showing how they've demonstrated
VM isolation under a paravirtualizing hypervisor to separate out
security zones on a single system. X11 is in one VM, some user
applications are in another VM,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:55:11PM +0530, staticd wrote:
The drivers (virtualbox-guest-dkms, virtualbox-guest-x11,
virtualbox-guest-utils) are in debian and ubuntu repos (universe) and total
to only 1.8MB.
What about dependencies? DKMS packages need quite a bit of supporting
infrastucture
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote:
Although I am probably hammering a rather cold iron, I still fail to
understand why ntp is not installed by default. I would expect precise
timekeeping to be something important on a server (instead of allowing
the time to drift
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:33:26PM +, James Page wrote:
Hi Folks
Description: Default server install
[...]
wireless-tools
wpasupplicant
For bootstrapping reasons, it would be nice to keep these on the ISO
even if not in the default install. Would there be any real cost to
doing this? I
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:21:49PM -0500, Daniel Hollocher wrote:
So again, how could this be fixed in Ubuntu? If there are hardware
specific optimal values for sampling_down_factor, how would that get
included into Ubuntu?
Am I right in understanding that this value can be changed at
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:09:51PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Nov 08, 2013, at 01:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
H. bzr-builddeb works fine for me. The problem is with the UDD
*branches*, which are an unmitigated disaster.
Well, not a complete disaster, unless you care
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:11:45AM -0600, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
Sounds like bad maintainers justifying being bad if you ask me.
Please be respectful. The Ubuntu Code of Conduct applies on this list.
It's fine to call out their security policy. That appears to be based on
fact. But I don't think
== Agenda ==
* Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* everyone spend extra time triaging bugs this week
* Saucy Development
* Release Tracking Bug Tasks -
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-s-tracking-bug-tasks.html#server
* Blueprints -
This was my first stint at piloting as a new uploader. Laney was on at
the same time and helped me out. Thanks Laney!
67 in the queue at start, 52 at end (thanks to Laney also, who piloted
at the same time as me).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1121874
bug readiness
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:05:41PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM, AG Restringere
Since when did Nvidia stop offering the latest downloads via their
website? Or is this just an excuse for you to continue to be lazy
instead of downloading the source and compiling
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 07:11:39AM +, Sharma Bhupesh-B45370 wrote:
I am using a 64-bit ubuntu machine running a 12.04 LTS.
I see that the DTC (Device Tree Compiler) version is 1.3.0
It looks like 1.4.0 was released in Debian a couple of weeks ago:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:54:09AM -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
Since the problem also occurs with the 12.10 and 13.04 server ISO's,
I'm not sure that logging a bug on launchpad is the right way to go
-- the problem is not 13.10 specific. My next step is to make a
note of all the grub
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59:41PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Has any work been done on concurrent requests? That would likely be
pretty broadly useful, not just for cloud images.
AIUI, apt-get already supports concurrent requests, but only to
diffferent servers at once. From my
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:59:41PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Has any work been done on concurrent requests? That would likely be
pretty broadly useful, not just for cloud images.
AIUI, apt-get already supports concurrent requests, but only to
diffferent servers at once. From my
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:51:46AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think most developers would believe the current situation is appropriate.
I disagree.
By default users have the same access to source and binary packages and for a
free software distribution, that is the ethically correct
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:02:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
So those are a couple of examples of what I think is definitely not what we
want. I'm open to discussion about alternate ways to preserve easy access to
the source.
How about:
$ sudo apt-get source hello
Reading package
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:24:31AM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote:
andreas@j3515:~$ sudo add-apt-repository
The program 'add-apt-repository' is currently not installed. You can
install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
andreas@j3515:~$
add-apt-repository is not
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:31:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Before we run off and expend a lot more effort on this, I'd like to
see something other than handwaving that this is really is a
significant issue.
[size comparisions snipped]
My concern is latency, not size. How many round
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:51:46AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think most developers would believe the current situation is appropriate.
I disagree.
By default users have the same access to source and binary packages and for a
free software distribution, that is the ethically correct
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:02:02AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
So those are a couple of examples of what I think is definitely not what we
want. I'm open to discussion about alternate ways to preserve easy access to
the source.
How about:
$ sudo apt-get source hello
Reading package
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:31:15PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Before we run off and expend a lot more effort on this, I'd like to
see something other than handwaving that this is really is a
significant issue.
[size comparisions snipped]
My concern is latency, not size. How many round
Martin,
Thanks for doing this - it'll be much easier for me to write and debug
my tests now.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:27:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
It's a bit unfortunate that Python's unittest defaults to outputting
the test progress to stderr (i. e. something which is not an error at
== Agenda ==
* Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* ''ACTION:'' Daviey set priority on s-cycle BPs
* ''ACTION:'' Daviey follow up on missing BPs from overview s-topic
* Saucy Development
* Release Tracking Bug Tasks -
It's not much good to know that an app is misbehaving. I'd like to stop
it.
Having an all-or-nothing choice, like Android, often means that apps get
feature creep, and before you know it your apps have far more
permissions than you'd prefer. Individually we may know that we have a
choice to not
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:34:36PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
We just got DSA-2706-1 which upgraded Debian's Chromium to 27 but
received no USN for the old version of Chromium in Ubuntu so I was
wondering if there was going to be a USN and an update since normally
I get USN's before DSA's.
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:20:22PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Robbie and I discussed that again, and found a compromise for this
which works around our ssh and sudo behaviour and should just do the
wrong thing in rare corner cases now, unless of course people actually
rely on the current
use case which helps demonstrate the locale issues I'm trying to present
here).
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:03:10PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Robie Basak [2013-06-04 9:32 +0100]:
c) Make openssh default to not passing the locale across
I have always considered this default behaviour of ssh
Is it valid for packages (eg. maintainer scripts) to fail if you have an
invalid locale configured? Is such a failure a bug in the package?
If it is not, and we expect systems to only work when configured locales
are valid, then how should we deal with the use case below?
In the case of
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:02:09AM +0200, Bolesław Tokarski wrote:
On 06/03/2013 09:06 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
ldap-auth-config is an ubuntu specific package, which seems to be
basically unmaintained for some time now. Then again I don't see why
libpam/nss-ldap should be touched, if we're
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Anca Emanuel wrote:
Any reason to delay gparted 0.16.1 ?
or libblkid 2.23 ?
It looks like Ubuntu is pretty close to up to date with Debian for both
packages, so this question would probably best be directed there. Or,
somebody needs to do the packaging
Bolesław,
Thanks very much for writing this up. It's great to see somebody driving
this. I'd love to see better support for corporate authentication to go
into Ubuntu.
I think you guys are the experts when it comes to technologies used, so
I'll step back and watch that unfolds from other experts
Another idea about mechanism:
It seems to me that apt-get update does two logical tasks which serve
two different use cases for many users, one of which is rare and
often unnecessary.
How about an apt configuration option that, when enabled (default: off),
disables source index downloads when
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:54:25PM -0400, John Moser wrote:
- libav is garbage, full of hacks, loaded with massive security concerns,
breaks things for existing users, and is only used by Ubuntu because it's
in Debian and/or because some key Ubuntu/Debian developers are also libav
developers.
(with my personal hat on)
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 01:48:47PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I think that's legally sufficient, but not in the spirit of free software.
I agree that it's legally sufficient.
I also agree that making the sources easily available for download is
part of the
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:04:20PM +0100, J Fernyhough wrote:
On 21 May 2013 13:55, Robie Basak robie.ba...@canonical.com wrote:
What if we provided a reasonable message if no deb-src lines are
defined, with a single simple command to add them and run apt-get
update for you?
I don't
Oops; intended to reply to list.
- Forwarded message from Robie Basak robie.ba...@canonical.com -
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 16:49:59 +0100
From: Robie Basak robie.ba...@canonical.com
To: agya naila agya.na...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Fast remote command execution
With a shared persistent ssh
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:58:41PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Everything gets uploaded into -proposed, FTBFS / installability /
components mismatches are sorted out [*] / autopkgtests [*] are run
and then the packages are finally migrated by britney into rolling as
it is currently done.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:34:55AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
Also remember that, as the idea currently stands, the tiny set of
enthusiasts are the only people who will get updated versions of
applications. The majority of users will have a stale experience, and no
reasonable alternative.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:23:37AM -0500, John Moser wrote:
OK further research yields that Debian is not updating Sid due to
feature freeze for Testing. However, Mathisain notes this:
On the other hand, the master packaging branch at
401 - 500 of 516 matches
Mail list logo
