On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:11 AM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:02:23AM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote:
> > Original SRU 'justification' written in the bug[1] states the regression
> > risk is "There should be none." As you stated elsewhere, "none" is not
> > a valid
Robie and everyone else:
On 9/23/20 1:41 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> ## torbrowser-launcher (Focal)
>
> I helped the contributor with this one previously, and am pleased to see
> it's been sponsored. Unfortunately it's missing the LP bug reference,
> but also the contributor has since mentioned in
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:02:23AM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote:
> Original SRU 'justification' written in the bug[1] states the regression
> risk is "There should be none." As you stated elsewhere, "none" is not
> a valid risk justification.
>
> Further, they're waiting for this to be
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'm disappointed to see that scilab was rejected without referring to the SRU
> exception for OpenJDK-11 in bionic. We all knew that this move past the
> bionic
> release would be painful, and it doesn't make sense to backport
On 9/23/20 7:41 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On my SRU shift today, I'm disappointed to report that out of sixteen
> packages I looked at, I didn't end up accepting a single one.
I'm disappointed to see that scilab was rejected without referring to the SRU
exception for OpenJDK-11 in bionic. We all
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:41 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On my SRU shift today, I'm disappointed to report that out of sixteen
> packages I looked at, I didn't end up accepting a single one. Some of
> this is because I ran out of time, but I am writing this report because
> I think that with some
Just a heads up on a bit here...
On 9/23/20 1:41 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> ## torbrowser-launcher (Focal)
>
> I helped the contributor with this one previously, and am pleased to see
> it's been sponsored. Unfortunately it's missing the LP bug reference,
> but also the contributor has since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Il 23/09/20 19:41, Robie Basak ha scritto:
> ## gnome-shell (Bionic)
>
> I identified a possible problem when I first looked at this in
> August. This might inadvertently introduce a regression. We have
> been awaiting an analysis from a
On my SRU shift today, I'm disappointed to report that out of sixteen
packages I looked at, I didn't end up accepting a single one. Some of
this is because I ran out of time, but I am writing this report because
I think that with some help from you, we can do much better.
I'm aware that many
