On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:28:29AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm concerned that this requires subscription to the package in Debian for
> this to not fall off the radar. We have merges.ubuntu.com which tracks
> which packages need to be updated, and the standing assumption is that the
>
Hi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Steve Langasek
wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:24:31AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> > I thought of:
> > a) bite the bullet. Upload 4.4.0-4ubuntu2 dropping the delta,
> > subscribe to the tiff package in debian, and sync it manually
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:24:31AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I thought of:
> a) bite the bullet. Upload 4.4.0-4ubuntu2 dropping the delta,
> subscribe to the tiff package in debian, and sync it manually the next
> time there is a debian upload
I'm concerned that this requires
Oh, this is a rabbit hole...
I'll just bite the bullet and drop the delta in 4ubuntu2, and watch
for new debian uploads.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:36 AM Marc Deslauriers
wrote:
>
> On 2022-08-18 09:24, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian
On 2022-08-18 09:24, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.05.22 um 13:22 schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
>>> [...]
We needed a version that does not contain the word "ubuntu", so it can be
auto-synced, once the committed patch is
And I forgot the links:
1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiff/4.4.0-4ubuntu1
2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lerc/+bug/1977551
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:24 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian wrote:
> >
> > Am 25.05.22 um
Hi,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:52 AM Lukas Märdian wrote:
>
> Am 25.05.22 um 13:22 schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
> > [...]
> >> We needed a version that does not contain the word "ubuntu", so it can be
> >> auto-synced, once the committed patch is uploaded into Debian. But at the
> >> same
> >> time
Am 25.05.22 um 13:22 schrieb Marc Deslauriers:
[...]
We needed a version that does not contain the word "ubuntu", so it can be
auto-synced, once the committed patch is uploaded into Debian. But at the same
time we needed it to be bigger than the current version (1.0.1-3build2) and
wanted it to
Hi,
On 2022-05-25 05:44, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We had an interesting discussion with @enr0n and @brian-murray recently, about
> which version string to choose if we want an Ubuntu package (+delta) to be
> auto-synced, without the need for a manual merge. The results might be of
>
In the past, when we did uploads into Ubuntu that we want to autosync,
we simply used `+bN` as those are bigger than last debian source
version, and get autosynced.
It is a slight misnomer, as it is Debian's binNMU version number, but
that also means none of debian's source versions may ever use
Hi all!
We had an interesting discussion with @enr0n and @brian-murray recently,
about which version string to choose if we want an Ubuntu package
(+delta) to be auto-synced, without the need for a manual merge. The
results might be of interest for the broader Ubuntu developer community!
11 matches
Mail list logo
