On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 09:53:06PM +0200, Frank Heimes wrote:
> There is a little bit more on "removing packages" here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing_Packages
> So it's actually a 'must' to have a LP bug for getting a package removed.
The word "must" does not
On Sunday, May 5, 2024 12:53:06 PM PDT Frank Heimes wrote:
> There is a little bit more on "removing packages" here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing_Packages
> So it's actually a 'must' to have a LP bug for getting a package removed.
>
> BR, Frank
Hi Frank,
I
There is a little bit more on "removing packages" here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing_Packages
So it's actually a 'must' to have a LP bug for getting a package removed.
BR, Frank
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 7:32 PM Simon Quigley wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> As a Debian
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 3:12 AM Dima Kogan wrote:
> 2. As I just discovered, when Ubuntu rebuilds the archive for a release,
>packages that FTBFS are silently dropped. There's no bug report on
>either of the two bug trackers. I'm upstream for a project that has
>been excluded from
Hi Dima,
As a Debian Developer myself, I understand your concerns. Processes in
this respect could be slightly better, but it also comes down to the
differences between the two distributions. More detailed responses inline.
On 5/2/24 10:56 AM, Dima Kogan wrote:
Hello.
I'm a Debian
Hello.
I'm a Debian developer, and contribute to Ubuntu only indirectly: by my
contributions to Debian being automatically pulled into Ubuntu. But
since Ubuntu has more users than Debian, most of MY users use the Ubuntu
packages. So I'd like to talk about improving the links between the two
