I think we should be pointing it back to paste.ubuntu.com, because our
existing users expect it will go to a distro owned pastebin, and we
should remain consistent.
I am also all for keeping user data on IS controlled assets, we don't
exactly know who controls dpaste, and if they parse dmesg or
Hi Milan,
Once an Ubuntu series is finalised and released, it is essentially frozen
for stability reasons.
There are certain circumstances when packages are updated, which is set out
in the Stable Release Updates process:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
This normally involves
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 06:11, John Chittum wrote:
>
> Could we add "Keeping the last run"
Yes please! Can we add keeping the last successful run, as well as the
last current run? If the current run fails, its nice to be able to
compare to a previous successful run.
>
> That way you delete, but
Hi Daniel,
The two CVEs you mention, CVE-2023-27522 and CVE-2023-25690, have already
been
addressed in Ubuntu, and have been since March.
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-27522
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-25690
For 22.04, these were both fixed in apache2 2.4.52-1ubuntu4.4:
ntal-ness of util-linux I think it's better to be safe.
>
> Cheers,
> mwh
>
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 02:43, Paride Legovini wrote:
>>
>> Bryce Harrington wrote on 18/02/2022:
>> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
>> >>
Hi all,
I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as
things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a
second opinion would be much appreciated.
util-linux 2.37.2 in Jammy has introduced some new behaviour for lsblk and
similar tools
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >It's not necessary to remove the unattended-upgrades package in order to
> >achieve this. unattended-upgrades is configurable, and it's sufficient to
> >set 'APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "0";' in
>
Hi everyone.
I was testing Jammy and happened to notice that unattended-upgrades Depends on
ubuntu-server-minimal, and when removing unattended-upgrades,
ubuntu-server-minimal is removed along with it:
$ sudo apt remove unattended-upgrades
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
Hi Chris, Steve,
>> I'm sure you have seen Ansgar's reply here:
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/08/msg00121.html
>
>> > That grants additional rights to the `adm` group that it did not have
>> > before, for example to clear the dmesg buffer:
>> >
>> > $ dmesg --clear
>>
Hi Chris,
[..]
> Do you happen to know if there was a similar proposal discussed in
> Debian?
I don't believe this has been discussed in Debian. The only bugs I found was
#570358 and #867747 which are for /var/log/dmesg only. Additionally, I found
https://wiki.debian.org/NewInStretch, which
Hello!
I am again following up on my proposal to enable CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT
on Groovy onward with debdiffs necessary to implement the feature.
Since there have been no replies, I am assuming that no one has any objections
to adding this feature. The kernel team and security team are
6PM +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I am proposing that we enable the CONFIG_SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT [1] feature
>> by
>> default for Groovy onward.
>
> Seems like the discussion on this has stalled. I checked with the
> security team and the
community.
Thanks,
Matthew Ruffell
Sustaining Engineering
[1]
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.html#dmesg-restrict
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
13 matches
Mail list logo
