DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was introduced in
12.04 (one of the benefits), to prevent privacy issues, and to
prevent local users from spying on source ports and trivially
performing a birthday attack in order to poison the cache.
Since dnsmasq eg introduced the standard
On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org wrote:
DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was introduced in
12.04 (one of the benefits), to prevent privacy issues, and to
prevent local users from spying on source ports and trivially
performing a birthday attack in
On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org
mailto:dan...@quora.org wrote:
DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was introduced in
12.04 (one of the benefits), to prevent privacy issues, and to
prevent local
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org
mailto:dan...@quora.org wrote:
DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was introduced in
12.04
On 8 October 2012 08:27, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org
mailto:dan...@quora.org wrote:
On 8 October 2012 03:19, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org
mailto:dan...@quora.org wrote:
DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was introduced in
12.04 (one of
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Daniel J Blueman dan...@quora.org wrote:
Can you elaborate the specific reasons/mechanisms why without per-user
caching, dnsmasq is still a security weakness? At least these views
should be shared upstream so we can work on resolving the issues.
It's a
