In looking at the code I feel like this is effectively addressed in the
current linux_net.py, please reopen if it's still an issue.
** Changed in: nova
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Is this still valid? this bug is very old
** Changed in: nova
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899
Title:
nova fails to configure
** Tags added: network
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899
Title:
nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in
instances
To manage notifications
** Also affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899
Title:
nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS
** Tags added: canonistack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899
Title:
nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in
instances
To manage
So there needs an option to have multiple dns servers correct?
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
** Tags added: ops
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059899
Title:
nova fails to configure dnsmasq, resulting in DNS timeouts in
instances
To manage notifications
As discussed in IRC:
If the domain I assign to nova is its own (which I believe it should
be), then it should be authoritative for that zone. As in it shouldn't
go asking the upstream resolver to give it answers for things that are
delegated to it. This is also true of the reverse zone for the
