On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:54 +, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:36:11 Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
developers to Fosscamp, and
Hi Scott,
Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to
collaborate on a final solution. I'll attend Fooscamp and I'm ready to
discuss
I would just like to present my opinion on this one...
This change was introduced in Debian as fix for Debian bug 367105:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367105
Both configurations have valid use cases. I'm kind of in favor of
having bacula file daemon listening only on
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 18:36:11 Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for taking the time to get in touch with the Ubuntu Development
team. We understand that bacula is planning to send a couple of
developers to Fosscamp, and think that might be an appropriate forum to
collaborate on a
