Quoting Gary Poster (gary.pos...@canonical.com):
Hi Serge. I don't actually know the original intent of -b, but what you
say makes sense. I changed our code to change all bind mounts in the
ephemeral's container to an ephemeral overlay, instead. That's kind of
what I wanted anyway, but I
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951150
Title:
lxc-start-ephemeral is not all ephemeral
To manage
Hi Gary,
if that's what you want I'll happily import the branch, but my
understanding was that the -b directory was meant as a way to copy the
end result to the host.
The branch addressing this isn't linked to this bug yet. Can you make
sure to add a changelog entry with a (LP: #951150) and
Hi Serge. I don't actually know the original intent of -b, but what you
say makes sense. I changed our code to change all bind mounts in the
ephemeral's container to an ephemeral overlay, instead. That's kind of
what I wanted anyway, but I was being lazy. :-) I also worried it would
not be
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951150
Title:
lxc-start-ephemeral is not all ephemeral
To manage
