I believe we fixed that in 0.9 with the rewrite in python.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969604
The new implementation in python should fix that as the cleanup is now
done by an lxc stop script, so even if lxc-start-ephemeral isn't
running, the cleanup will occur.
This change will land once we rebase Ubuntu's lxc on the git staging
branch.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thanks, Gary.
To be honest, I think we should re-visit the goals of lxc-start-
ephemeral at UDS-Q, and rewrite it to be more robust and focused. (Then
we coudl also send the result upstream)
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status:
I agree. I was thinking as I wrote this that we would be awfully close
to being able to get rid of the -- COMMAND stuff if this were
implemented, for instance; and generally close to being able to make
lxc-start-ephemeral behave very similarly to lxc-start in terms of
interaction patterns.
