[Bug 541439] Re: php5 should provide php5-mhash transitional package to remove mhash.ini conffile

2010-11-13 Thread DigiAngel
I'm in the same boat after upgrading to 10.10..I get emails stating: PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20090626/mhash.so' - /usr/lib/php5/20090626/mhash.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 mhash.so doesn't

[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers

2010-11-13 Thread Xavier Robin
I fully agree with comment 6 by Perry E. Metzger. Switching to ntp pool should not be a security issue as bad servers are automatically filtered from the pool. Additionally, bad servers are detected by the NTP algorithm if enough servers are selected (they are called falsetickers, see

[Bug 665512] Re: can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10

2010-11-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba Status: Unknown = Confirmed -- can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 665512] Re: can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10

2010-11-13 Thread Jack
ok! it works! Back to Ubuntu. By the way Tom, when you're saying (...)installing them will prevent future automatic updates, what do you mean precisely? you're talking about samba package or no more updates at all? (kernel,) anyway, thanks! I *really* need to print a lot! -- can't print

[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers

2010-11-13 Thread Xavier Robin
To push it a bit I requested a vendor zone in the pool. I should get an answer within 3 days and will let you know. I hope it will help this bug forward. -- default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 674943] [NEW] autofs5 attempts bind mounts with nfs4, but can't perform them correctly

2010-11-13 Thread Matt Mossholder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 Description:Ubuntu 10.10 autofs: Installed: 5.0.5-0ubuntu21 When using autofs5 to mount a directory exported as nfs4 from localhost, autofs5 attempts to perform a --bind mount, like it would with nfs2 or nfs3. This does not work

[Bug 674745] Re: qemu segfaults when security_model not specified using virtio-9p-pci driver

2010-11-13 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- qemu segfaults when security_model not specified using virtio-9p-pci driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 674645] Re: occasional crashes: glibc detected double free or corruption

2010-11-13 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch -- occasional crashes: glibc detected double free or corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 674645] Re: occasional crashes: glibc detected double free or corruption

2010-11-13 Thread Dave Walker
@Simon, yes - It is fixed in the latest development version via the fix from Debian. However, the fix will not automatically happen in both Maverick and Lucid. -- occasional crashes: glibc detected double free or corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674645 You received this bug

[Bug 541439] Re: php5 should provide php5-mhash transitional package to remove mhash.ini conffile

2010-11-13 Thread Daniel Hahler
@Jeffrey: please do not assign bug to yourself, when you're not planning to work on it. Re-assigning Chuck. The workaround is to remove the mhash.ini file: rm /etc/php5/conf.d/mhash.ini (not verified) ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Assignee: jeffreyguo (govip) = Chuck Short (zulcss) -- php5

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread Olivier Le Merdy
This is great news to finally get OpenLdap back working smoothly in Ubuntu. Cannot wait to plug authentifications back on LDAP without fearing to break everything with an update. Any chance to get it soon on Maverick through maverick-backports? Bigs thanks for this work! -- openldap install

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread Thag
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in

[Bug 623144] Re: chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated

2010-11-13 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Same issue with on one of my ubuntu servers 10.10 (64b). Can we hope to have an official fix soon ? -- chkutmp assert failure: *** stack smashing detected ***: ./chkutmp terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Seconded. Please provide a backport to lucid! -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. --

[Bug 675052] [NEW] Upgrade from hardy (8.04) to lucid (10.04) sets bad permissions on olcDatabase={-1}frontend, cn=config

2010-11-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Public bug reported: When upgrading from hardy to lucid, the following permissions are set on the frontend : # {-1}frontend, config dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external ,cn=auth manage by * break instead of: dn:

Re: [Bug 665512] Re: can't print after upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10

2010-11-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
Just the samba package... The rest of the system is fine. On 11/13/2010 08:45 AM, Jack wrote: ok! it works! Back to Ubuntu. By the way Tom, when you're saying (...)installing them will prevent future automatic updates, what do you mean precisely? you're talking about samba package or no