[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2015-09-01 Thread mit
** Package changed: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) => cyborg ** Changed in: cyborg Assignee: (unassigned) => mit (mit2596) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title:

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2015-03-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/chkrootkit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage notifications about this

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2015-03-23 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Debian) Status: Unknown = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2015-03-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package chkrootkit - 0.50-3ubuntu1 --- chkrootkit (0.50-3ubuntu1) vivid; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable. (LP: #454566) Remaining changes: - debian/patches/fix-stack-smash.patch: + Fix segfault when running chkrootkit. (Closes: #767403)

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2015-03-23 Thread Artur Rona
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #740898 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898 ** Also affects: chkrootkit (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740898 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-12-16 Thread Serge Hallyn
Looking at the patch applied in F21, it doesn't seem like Fedora actually fixed it. They simply check whether /sbin/init is a link to systemd, and ignore the report if so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-12-14 Thread Thomas Mayer
Fedora fixed it in FC21 with chkrootkit-0.50-4.fc2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231#c1 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #636231 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636231 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-11-10 Thread Rigved Rakshit
+1 to backporting chkrootkit 0.50. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-09-18 Thread Thomas Leavitt
Current version of chkrootkit is 0.50, released on June 4th, 2014. Maybe we could get that version packaged up and backported? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-07-31 Thread Madden
Alright did some checking for myself, I just went ahead and did the sha256sum checks on my own as well as hardlink check. I've made a tutorial to check yourself -- Testing with Sha256sum/md5sum First we want to make a sha256sum or md5sum of the init in our system. To do

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-07-30 Thread Madden
Confirmed still exists even in Linux Mint. No idea why Ubuntu has this problem. Maybe it's not a false positive? Who really knows. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-07-17 Thread msth67
Following comment #30,I've also verified the md5sum of my /sbin/init with the original package on http://packages.ubuntu.com/ and they do match. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-07-14 Thread msth67
Same here on Lubuntu 14.04 : on a new install chkrootkit reports Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED but then there's no evidence of this with repeated passes of unhide and rkhunter. Apparently,also running chkrootkit -x and chkrootkit -x does not report the infection,as far as I can see. -- You

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-06-27 Thread NiVeK
I also get this notice on 14.04 and Linux Mint 17(based on 14.04) chkroothit -n Searching for Suckit rootkit...Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu.

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-06-13 Thread Adam Funk
Just upgraded two machines to 14.04; one of them is still getting this. I wonder why there is no option on Ubuntu's and put your money where your mouth is page for fix known bugs instead of fiddling with the GUI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-06-08 Thread rpkrawczyk
After an upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 I got a scared with the message suckit rootkit detected, too. rkhunter does not find anything. Here is the MD5SUM of my /sbin/init c9b343f85e6804e2d7ee70b810b1a15a /sbin/init which is the same as found in /var/lib/dpkg/info/upstart.md5sums. -- You received

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-04-24 Thread Sander Johansen
In most major new distros (including redhat and ubuntu) strings /sbin/init | grep HOME returns: XDG_CACHE_HOME XDG_CONFIG_HOME which still triggers an alert (false positive) for suckit rootkit in 14.04. I checked the suckit source, and it gives: sk2rc2$ strings ./src/sk | grep HOME HOME=%s So

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-04-24 Thread Sander
heres a patch for it ** Patch added: Chkroot suckit false positive fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/454566/+attachment/4095317/+files/chkrootkit_suckit_false_positive.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-04-24 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment Chkroot suckit false positive fix seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment, remove the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team. [This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-03-19 Thread Galen Thurber
exits in xubuntu 13.10 32bit and you may get egrep not found error as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2014-01-10 Thread UBUCATZ
PROBLEM STILL EXISTS ON 14.04 LTS!!! please either fix chkrootkit or change /sbin/init - I hope in a more security aware post snowden era this will now trigger some more action - certainly many users will be very irritated about this. This does not happen on other distros. Must be fixed before

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2013-10-29 Thread Jorik Jonker
Problem still exists on 13.10 / amd64. I've dumped /sbin/init with debugfs, compared it with the one from the package and they are identical. /sbin/init seems to match 'HOME' and /proc/1/maps does not match 'init.' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2013-05-25 Thread chrisfaron
Yes same for me with a fresh install of 13.04 this bug still shows -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2013-05-17 Thread Adam Funk
This went away in 12.10 and reappared when I upgraded to 13.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage notifications

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2012-12-12 Thread Jay Gates
For those similarly affected: I recently reinstalled the upstart package (0.6.5-8) on Lucid (10.04.4) and then received the Suckit [false] flag from chkrootkit 0.49-3 (as well as the version in Debian Wheezy (0.49-4.1)). After restarting the server, the flag disappeared. So, it appears to be

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2011-03-21 Thread Oliver
Same here, also a falsepos (conclusion after doing the other usual tests for Suckit). The problem exists in Lucid Lynx: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid $ apt-cache show chkrootkit

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2011-02-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
+1 on Maverick after installing upstart 0.6.6-4 on 2011-02-11. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2011-02-06 Thread Brownout
Confirmed on Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-08-25 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Medium ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-08-25 Thread windracer
Same thing for me. After my Lucid box ran weekly updates I started seeing the Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED message from chkrootkit. -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-08-21 Thread moojix
i have exact the same behavior and output as Maxime wrote in #14. This false positive happens on my box since 17.08.2010 after this update: Preparing to replace upstart 0.6.5-6 (using .../upstart_0.6.5-7_amd64.deb) -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-08-19 Thread Maxime
I can confirm the issue on Lucid. It's probably related to an upstart update to 0.6.5-7. # lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS # chkrootkit -V chkrootkit version 0.49 # chkrootkit [...] Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-08-16 Thread Matt Eskes
I've got a reproduction here on a Lucid install. Linux Neptune 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 06:07:29 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux mes...@neptune:/sbin$ sudo chkrootkit -V chkrootkit version 0.49 Searching for Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-04-28 Thread Chuck Short
can you try to reproduce this on lucid please? chuck -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-04-28 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Wednesday, 2010-04-28 at 18:09:39 -, Chuck Short wrote: can you try to reproduce this on lucid please? Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing found I believe the false positive was gone for quite a while, probably due to changes in init. Lupe Christoph -- |

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-18 Thread Thierry Carrez
False positives with such tools come with the territory. Refused as a server papercut during 20100217 meeting. ** Changed in: server-papercuts Status: New = Invalid -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-11 Thread Lupe Christoph
I'm pretty sure I saw the string HOME in /sbin/init, but I can't prove it anymore. BTW, expertmode_output is just debugging: expertmode_output() { echo ### echo ### Output of: $1 echo ### eval $1 21 #cat EOF #`$1 21` #EOF return 0 } -- False positive for SucKit

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-10 Thread Alex Muntada
** Also affects: server-papercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu. --

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-10 Thread Alex Muntada
Just tried on latest karmic and it does not fail: ii chkrootkit 0.48-10 ii upstart0.6.3-11 $ ls -li /sbin/init /sbin/telinit 444149 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 169676 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/init 448912 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 79312 2009-12-10 17:19 /sbin/telinit Can you please confirm

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-10 Thread Lupe Christoph
I have seen this problem pop up a few times since I reported it and vanish again. Must be related to Phase of Moon. Right now it has disappeared: Searching for Suckit rootkit... nothing found chkrootkit: Installed: 0.48-10 The version of chkrootkit is still the

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-02-10 Thread Alex Muntada
I don't think that chkrootkit alerting about this rootkit is related to upstart init changes, but the output from /proc/1/maps instead. Something like this should improve the test: expertmode_output ${egrep} '^[^/]+${ROOTDIR}sbin/init.' ${ROOTDIR}proc/1/maps What do you think? -- False

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2010-01-21 Thread ardchoille
Confirmed in Karmic. I posted this to the Ubuntu forums and was referred this bug report. My forums post is here:http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1386791 -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-23 Thread Chuck Short
Thanks for the bug report. This will be looked at again for karmic+1. Regards chuck ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Wishlist ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-19 Thread Chuck Short
Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to improve it. Thanks chuck ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- False positive for SucKit

Re: [Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-19 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2009-10-19 at 13:18:45 -, Chuck Short wrote: Thanks for the bug report. I was wondering if you have any suggestion to improve it. Well, as there are some finer tests on the page I mentioned, what about implementing them in chkrootkit? Lupe Christoph -- | There is no substitute

[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit

2009-10-18 Thread Lupe Christoph
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872395/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33872396/XsessionErrors.txt -- False positive for SucKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 You received this bug