Somehow my Samba server changed to a PDC. I noticed after tesparming the conf
file. When I changed it back to standalone, I could see my shares again!
I was about to give up as well!!
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
Hello,
I tried changing the password of my main account, but got the same issue.
The second account i created can still connect.
Following justinc comment, my client machine is running Vista...
Rgds,
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
@justinc, Patrick Martin: could you try changing the password for the
primary/sudo user to see if it changes anything ? libpam-smbpass
theorically synchronizes the system password with the samba password
(when the user is first created, when the password is changed, and at
login time), but there
Alright, I've figured out some of my weirdness... I tried my netbook
that runs ubuntu, it connects to the desktop with samba. I tried my
wife's windows desktop, it connects to the desktop running samba. I
tried from a Centos 5.4 server/desktop and it connected to the desktop
running samba. I
I confirm justinc entry:
I just created a new user and he works fine, it appears that it is the
primary/sudo user that doesn't get authenticated.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug
Just wanted to say thanks for all your help. The Ubuntu Community is
awesome. I finally got mine working. This was the answer:
http://thedaneshproject.com/posts/vista-not-working-with-dhcp/
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
With respect Thierry - the bug is not I'm too ignorant to get it
working - the bug is It was working on Jaunty and it stopped on
Karmic.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification
@JG: Reading the original description, the bug is I have been tryiong
to get my 3 PC's networked, for the past few Ubuntu releases, with no
success. Not a karmic regression. You're experiencing a different bug,
and should have filed a different bugreport.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does
I don't think anyone meant to insult the developers here, far from it! we all
respect the expertise you offer! Sometimes frustration causes the best of us to
say the wrong thing at the wrong time.
However, I added to the bug because there are at least two other users here
with an identifiable
I've had many of the same issues reported in this Bug report over the
last couple of days since I installed 9.10. One thing I've noticed is I
can connect to my share from a secondary user from my macbook pro. If I
try the primary user that was created during the install, also has sudo
all access
Can we get this marked as NOT Invalid and Low priority??
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
I just created a new user and he works fine, it appears that it is the
primary/sudo user that doesn't get authenticated.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a
It is strange that this has low importance considering the comments here
and the people it affects! I've been reading through some of the other
samba, nmbd bugs and they do not seem to be as important as this one.
please can someone upgrade this?
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work,
I guess I should point out that this bug no longer affects me (for quite
a while), it seems after updates a while into Karmic's stable release.
Unfortunately, I was never able to pinpoint what changed, but I am still
watching this with interest. Has anyone confirmed the regression
recently?
One
This doesn't have low importance, this is invalid as a bug report.
Saying samba is too damn complicated, underdocumented, error-prone and
dependent of other network characteristics to be easily used as a
default file sharing solution is true, but it's not a bug. Nor is
samba is not working for
Correct. Apology offered. My bad.
Still, can't understand why this is lower priority than cloud, 3d
graphics, login sound, and other fluff issues, whereas this is a
fundamental flaw a core part of the operating system; and it's not just
an isolated, individual issue.
Maybe it is operator error,
Well I'm having the same problem with Samba; loaded on an Ubuntu-server, trying
to connect to a windows 7 netbook and a Kubuntu desktop machine. This was setup
and worked until recently. Now I have no connection to my Windows 7 netbook. My
Kubuntu machine connects to the server via a very
Editorial: Just amazed - I even got blasted on the forums on this - as
if it's my issue only... There were others there, as here, with the
exact problem. Maybe Mark S. was correct in abandoning ship (the
owner of the company that created Ubuntu.)
I think the days of intelligent developers and
This is an issue in the default install of Karmic. Functionality that
was in Jaunty has been removed. This affects the reputation and the
commercial viability of Ubuntu.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You
Pretty sad this is marked as low importance. Networking with windows
computers simply does not work for most people, pretty big thing to
overlook.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug
I have installed and set up several Samba networks in the past on Ubuntu
servers and desktops.
ON a new Karmic desktop machine I am experiencing similar problems.
In the log.smbd I see lines such as:
[2009/12/17 18:28:11, 0] smbd/server.c:1068(main)
smbd version 3.4.0 started.
Copyright
Related observations, as I try to stalk down the Launchpad bug that
surely must exist for the apparent CUPS/samba Upstart race*:
Nautilus will show browsable items via smb://ip_address or
smb://dns_name (where, if anyone is confused, ip_address would be e.g.
192.168.1.64 and dns_name could be
After upgrading to Karmic I have exactly the same problem. This is an
very serious problem. Samba is completely useless and there is even no
workaround mentioned here. How can this be classified as invalid/low?
I'm going to downgrade now...
Bye
Joern
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not
Just out of curiosity, is preferred master set to no on all of the
computers? Who is winning bcast elections?
- Scott
Joern Schimmelpfeng wrote:
After upgrading to Karmic I have exactly the same problem. This is an
very serious problem. Samba is completely useless and there is even no
Converting to a question since the reporter asks for the recommended way
to share files in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+question/87080
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just
Well?
If not for Karmic, then for Lucid!
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
I have a fresh install of karmic and no dice. This worked perfectly in
previous versions. This is a bug with samba and nothing to do with user
error.
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug
I have 2 virgin Karmic machines now, waiting to test.
Let's pretend I am a new Ubuntuite and want to have 2 PC's communicate in
Ubuntu and Windows XP.
If there is a bug we'll uncover it and if there is a config issue we'll clarify
it, and in the end, there will be a legit and validated
@emarkay:
1/ Windbind is used to integrate with Windows domains. It is not useful
to access SMB shares on individual workstations being part of a common
workgroup.
2/ The main issue you're reporting here is how much easier it should be
to set up shared files through Windows SMB networking on
First, sorry about sharename - I didn't even know about that - I guess
ShareName is the default?
Second - I notice that the folders I have made as shared are no longer, on
both machines - I reenabled them - I did not know when and how this had
happened.
#12:
1. Type in Location in Nautilus:
#4 Re:Winbind, because somewhere it was recommended to have installed.
winbind is a component of the Samba suite of programs that solves the unified
logon problem. Winbind uses a UNIX implementation of Microsoft RPC calls,
Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAMs), and the name service switch
#8: Regarding Winbind, all 3 machines ALSO have Win XPSP3 (NTFS) and I
do want and expect to be able to connect to those when booted as such.
But you now see all the bogus and misleading info that is out there
and we NEED to have Lucid address this!
Thierry, I will get the additional information
#8:
1. Winbind uninstalled vua Synaptic.
2. $ smb://192.168.x.xxx/sharename
bash: smb://192.168.x1.xxx/sharename: No such file or directory
3. /var/log/samba/log.nmbd
Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009, 1:39 PM
[2009/10/18 13:34:03, 0]
nmbd/nmbd.c:71(terminate)
Got SIGTERM: going down...
Again, what is Incomplete on this Bug submission?
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
My bad -- I didn't mean to mark this Confirmed -- it stays Incomplete.
emarkay, this bug is marked Incomplete because we need more information
in order to be able to understand and potentially fix the problem you're
experiencing.
There's a number of things we'd need to know:
- What happens if
What happens when you disable ufw?
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You
Chuck, that's Step One. Is that correctly formatted?
Shouldn't that be a native part of Samba Configuration since I understand UFW
is installed and activated by default? This example is one of the reasons I,
and many others, are having troubles with Ubuntu Networking (as evidenced on
the
Also, what is Incomplete about this report or issue, as indicated by
yis change in Status?
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
What are you using winbind for exactly ?
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Also do you manage to access the shares by typing directly
smb://IPADDRESS/sharename in the Nautilus location bar ? If yes, does
smb://MACHINENAME/sharename work ?
--
Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808
You received
@emarkay:
Yes that is the first step
You should just able to do sudo ufw allow samba as well. Also assuming
that all three of your computers are apart of the same workgroup. What
does /var/log/samba/log.smbd and /var/log/log.nmd say (if you can attach
those as well) Also can you attach the
#4: Winbind, because somewhere it was recommended to have installed.
#5:
1. smb://192.168.x.xxx/sharename in Nautilus (Ctrl-L) gives: the
shared directory on this machine only, after entering my share password.
2. smb://name of thus PC/sharenamegives: the shared directory on
this machine
43 matches
Mail list logo
