[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2021-11-04 Thread TJ
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xinput/+bug/1574341/+attachment/5538304/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574341

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2021-11-04 Thread TJ
Although most other issues are solved there is still no multitouch for this device with kernel v5.15 and xserver-xorg 1.20.13-1ubuntu1 using Kubuntu 21.10. # xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointerid=4

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different pixel widths

2021-04-08 Thread TJ
Had my techie test the SRU for 20.04 on the affected E495 and can confirm this works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895 Title: Regression: block staircase display with

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different pixel widths

2020-04-22 Thread TJ
I've worked with upstream AMD and we've fixed the problem in in xf86 -video-amdgpu. As soon as that is available in the upstream repository I'll prepare a cherry-pick update to 20.04. I suspect we also need to consider an SRU patch to 18.04 ? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different pixel widths

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
** Also affects: linux via https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-amdgpu/-/issues/10 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
Urgh, should have written "With the help and suggestions of 'brainwash' and 'bluesabre' on #xubuntu-devel..." ** Summary changed: - Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors + Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors of different pixel widths **

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
With the help and suggestions of Bluesabre on #xubuntu-devel we've tracked it down to a recent change in xfwm4 where it switched from using glx to xpresent: https://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfwm4/commit/?id=23900123ad8418149897a094d1096d6ecb984d3c which seems to be a bug in the driver as mentioned

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
** Also affects: xfwm4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895 Title: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
Reproducing this: $ xrandr -d :0.0 --output HDMI-A-0 --left-of eDP $ xrandr -d :0.0 --output HDMI-A-0 --right-of eDP No problem with: $ xrandr -d :0.0 --output HDMI-A-0 --above eDP $ xrandr -d :0.0 --output HDMI-A-0 --below eDP The affected and unaffected laptops each have identical kernel log

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] XorgLogOld.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357362/+files/XorgLogOld.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Lsusb-t.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357353/+files/Lsusb-t.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Xrandr.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357363/+files/Xrandr.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Lsusb-v.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357354/+files/Lsusb-v.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
Timo: yes, sorry, I think I got a bit confused about packages due to lack of sleep. I've reported this against xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu for now although looking at the apt history it wasn't updated. I'm not too familiar with the Xorg internals so any pointers on potential culprits would be

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] xdpyinfo.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357364/+files/xdpyinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
Tim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895 Title: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] XorgLog.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357361/+files/XorgLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] ProcModules.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357359/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] ProcInterrupts.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357358/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357355/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357356/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] UdevDb.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357360/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357357/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Lspci-vt.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357351/+files/Lspci-vt.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Lsusb.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357352/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Lspci.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357350/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] DpkgLog.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "DpkgLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357347/+files/DpkgLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] LightdmLog.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "LightdmLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357349/+files/LightdmLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Dependencies.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357346/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] LightdmDisplayLog.txt

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Attachment added: "LightdmDisplayLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873895/+attachment/5357348/+files/LightdmDisplayLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libxcb in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
apport information ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: apport-collected focal ubuntu ** Description changed: Two identical Lenovo E495 laptops with 20.04 installed. The problem occurred initially on the laptop that

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
These are the packages I've tested via a downgrade: $ apt list --upgradeable Listing... Done libxcomposite1/focal 1:0.4.5-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1:0.4.5-0ubuntu1] libxcomposite1/focal 1:0.4.5-1 i386 [upgradable from: 1:0.4.5-0ubuntu1] libxdamage1/focal 1:1.1.5-2 amd64 [upgradable from:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
I'm attaching the complete list of packages upgraded on the second laptop that triggered this bug. The total list is over 300 packages. I've prefixed the unlikely package with #. That leaves 77 possibles all related to X server or display drivers. ** Attachment added: "List of upgraded packages

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] Re: Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
The packages upgraded on the second laptop that are libx related are: $ grep 'Upgrade: hunspell' /var/log/apt/history.log | grep -o 'libx[^ ]*' libxml2-utils:amd64 libxml2:amd64 libxatracker2:amd64 libxcomposite1:amd64 libxcomposite1:i386 libxml2-dev:amd64 libxfixes3:amd64 libxfixes3:i386

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1873895] [NEW] Regression: block staircase display with side-by-side monitors

2020-04-20 Thread TJ
Public bug reported: Two identical Lenovo E495 laptops with 20.04 installed. The problem occurred initially on the laptop that is having package upgrades applied regularly. With dual monitors and the external monitor placed left or right the display has a blocked staircase effect shown in the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 421660] Re: gksu's and gksudo's modal password prompt prevents OnBoard's virtual keyboard input, causing accessibility issues

2019-06-11 Thread TJ
Had a user in IRC #ubuntu today re-rporting this for 18.04 when trying to use Onboard. The user was asked to create a new bug report for their issue but may not do so. Adding this link which may be useful for other users caught by this:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-02-21 Thread TJ
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-libinput in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655752 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-02-20 Thread TJ
@Robie: "It looks like your backport also pulled in upstream commit 116cddba69b37246db564c1ddf772c0144c589f0. Was this intentional?" No, from what I can see the backported commit 72bac84df9ce72f2baf730655ecc23f1692d1e64 removes and re-applies that specific change too. @Timo: My local package

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-19 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (tj) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-libinput in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655752 Title: Xorg cras

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-18 Thread TJ
) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-libinput (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => TJ (tj) ** Patch added: "Debdiff containing backported upstream fix" https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1655752/+attachment/4805807/+files/xs

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-15 Thread TJ
** No longer affects: xorg-server ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #97117 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97117 ** Also affects: xorg-server via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97117 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-12 Thread TJ
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #99390 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99390 ** Also affects: xorg-server via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99390 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-12 Thread TJ
The log file shows the input device(s) being removed upon system idle and the attempt to re-attach it failing. ** Attachment added: "Xorg log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1655752/+attachment/4803510/+files/Xorg.0.log.old -- You received this bug notification

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-11 Thread TJ
The NULL device bubbles up from xserver-xorg-input- libinput-0.18.0/src/xf86libinput.c::xf86libinput_pre_init() where it does is_subdevice = xf86libinput_is_subdevice(pInfo); if (!is_subdevice) { ... } else { InputInfoPtr parent; struct xf86libinput

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1655752] [NEW] Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in libinput_device_config_tap_get_finger_count()

2017-01-11 Thread TJ
Public bug reported: Using Xubuntu 16.04, including light-locker, whenever the screen has been locked the X server will SIGABRT crash as soon as the user has entered their credentials. This happens 100% of the time. The only related information I can find is a Debian bug report:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: [ELAN 3320KD-3100] Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-11-18 Thread TJ
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #98770 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98770 ** Also affects: xinput-calibrator via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98770 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Project changed: xinput-calibrator => libinput

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: [ELAN 3320KD-3100] Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-05-03 Thread TJ
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #117601 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117601 ** Also affects: xinput-calibrator via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117601 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: xinput-calibrator ** Also

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: [ELAN 3320KD-3100] Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-05-03 Thread TJ
** Summary changed: - Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly + [ELAN 3320KD-3100] Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-05-03 Thread TJ
I opened up the keyboard dock today to identify the touchpad chip. It is an ELAN 3320KD-3100 in a 64 pin QFN package. It links over Bluetooth using the Broadcom BCM20730 A1KFBG. The device presents over Bluetooth with an ASUS ID: 0B05:8502. ELAN call the touchpad the "Smart Pad":

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2016-04-30 Thread TJ
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #117451 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117451 ** Also affects: xinput-calibrator via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117451 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Project changed: xinput-calibrator => linux **

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Description changed: This is a related but separate issue to bug #1480673 "Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly". - Affecting this digitizer is also bug #1574028 "Asus T300 CHI: Synaptics - Touch Digitizer - missing at boot". + Affecting this digitizer is also bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xinput (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480673 Title: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574028] Re: Asus T300 CHI: Synaptics Touch Digitizer - missing at boot

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Summary changed: - 16,04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot + Asus T300 CHI: Synaptics Touch Digitizer - missing at boot ** Changed in: xinput (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: xinput (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Description changed: This is a related but separate issue to bug #1480673 "Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly". - Affecting this digitizer is also bug #1574028 "Asus T300 CHI: - touchscreen digitiser missing at boot". + Affecting this digitizer is also bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] Re: [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Description changed: This is a related but separate issue to bug #1480673 "Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly". + + Affecting this digitizer is also bug #1574028 "Asus T300 CHI: + touchscreen digitiser missing at boot". Using 16.04 amd64 Ubuntu (unity).

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
** Description changed: + Moved the touchscreen issues to bug #1574341 "[Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics + Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch". + The Asus T300 CHI has a touchscreen and a (bluetooth) keyboard/touchpad combo. Both (touchscreen, touchpad) only work like a mouse (moving pointer, left

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574341] [NEW] [Asus T300 CHI] Synaptics Touch Digitizer V04 - no multitouch

2016-04-24 Thread TJ
Public bug reported: This is a related but separate issue to bug #1480673 "Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly". Affecting this digitizer is also bug #1574028 "Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot". Using 16.04 amd64 Ubuntu (unity). In this case the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574028] Re: 16, 04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
** Summary changed: - 16,04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen missing at boot + 16,04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot ** Attachment added: "lsusb after cold boot"

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574028] Re: 16, 04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
** Attachment added: "ACPI DSDT decompiled" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xinput/+bug/1574028/+attachment/4644326/+files/dsdt.dsl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574028] [NEW] 16, 04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen digitiser missing at boot

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
Public bug reported: Using 16.04 amd64 on an Asus T300 CHI 2-in-1 transformer-book (tablet + docking Bluetooth keyboard/trackpad). At boot-time the USB-connected Synaptics touchscreen digitiser is not recognised but after an S3 sleep/resume it is. Smells like an ACPI issue but so far testing

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1574028] Re: 16, 04: Asus T300 CHI: touchscreen missing at boot

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
** Attachment added: "lsusb after S3 resume showing device" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xinput/+bug/1574028/+attachment/4644316/+files/lsusb.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
1 root root 4096 Apr 23 12:59 unbind tj@T300CHI:~$ lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 008: ID 06cb:11ef Synaptics, Inc. Bus 001 Device 005: ID 04f2:b3d5 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8087:0a2a Intel Corp. Bus 001 Devi

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-04-23 Thread TJ
My loss of the touchscreen seems to be due to my doing a lot of experimenting with evtest and udev's hwdb. After an S3 resume this morning the touchscreen Synaptic devices re-appeared. Thinking about it, it may also be due to some ACPI DSDT experimentation I was doing to try to get the Fn+F5-F7

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1480673] Re: Asus T300 CHI bluetooth Touchpad is recognized incorrectly

2016-04-22 Thread TJ
Confirmed here too... although with 16.04 / Unity there was touchscreen input during live session but after booting the installed system I just realised there is no touchscreen input device. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xinput

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 828893] Re: left mouse button ignored

2015-12-05 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jakob Povsic (jakob-povsic) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1512417] [NEW] fglrx gcc5 patch doesn't fix crash on 4.3 kernel

2015-11-02 Thread TJ Buchanan
Public bug reported: fglrx-installer-updates (2:15.201-0ubuntu2~15.10.2) wily-proposed does not fix crash on startup on the 4.3 stable kernel. Installed from ubuntu mainline ppa. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: fglrx-updates-core 2:15.201-0ubuntu2~15.10.2 Uname: Linux

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1237904] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in OsAbort()

2015-10-21 Thread TJ
The report in /var/log/Xorg.0.log: "_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: server already running" suggests the system (user: gdm, uid: 116) display manager X server on VT7 owns/uses the socket in "/tmp/.X11-unix/" which prevents the user (uid:1000) display manager on VT2 from using the same

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1237904] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in OsAbort()

2015-10-21 Thread TJ
** Tags added: apport-request-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237904 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in OsAbort() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 876520] Re: mouse cursor gone

2015-09-05 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Triaged ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => Medium ** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 876520] Re: mouse cursor gone

2015-09-05 Thread TJ
** Description changed: - The mouse cursor is gone when Oneiric starts. The mouse itself is + The mouse cursor is gone when the GUI starts. The mouse itself is responding, but the pointer is invisible. Very annoying. I do have a workaround. One must simply restart the lightdm interface with

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1479009] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT when browsing aliexpress.com with Firefox

2015-07-28 Thread TJ
** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479009 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1472633] [NEW] Source-code files have Proprietary Copyright License

2015-07-08 Thread TJ
Public bug reported: The explicit copyright text in each source file is Proprietary all rights reserved, not open source. The package copyright file /usr/share/doc/nvidia-340/copyright is less than ideal and only purports to repeat extracts from an email exchange, it is not a copyright license.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1314787] Re: Memory leak

2015-07-04 Thread TJ
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-14.04.3 -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1457017] [NEW] package fglrx 2:14.501-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-05-20 Thread TJ Olaes
Public bug reported: Happened while I was updating via software updater. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: fglrx 2:14.501-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-37.51~14.04.1-generic 3.16.7-ckt9 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-37-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 144178] Re: Silicon Motion X driver fails to correctly restore text mode; requires modprobe vga16fb fbcon

2014-12-12 Thread TJ
Unfortunately this driver has suffered bit-rot upstream since the chip- set is ancient and not widely used, and support for it in the 12.04 and 14.04 releases is poor to non-existant. Marking as Won't Fix since we haven't found the expertise to fix it in 7 years. ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1356111] [NEW] [Trusty] packages have Suggests for non-existent packages

2014-08-12 Thread TJ
-xfree86-nonfree, xfs ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: TJ (tj) Status: Triaged ** Affects: wdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: TJ (tj) Status: Triaged ** Affects: xfonts-terminus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1247736] Re: [SRU] nvidia-opencl-icd-* should not conflicts/replaces on opencl-icd

2014-06-20 Thread TJ
** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247736 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1039916] Re: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer

2014-02-15 Thread TJ
** Changed in: nvclock (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (tj) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039916 Title: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 342926] Re: No PCI IOMEM space available below 4GB

2013-09-12 Thread TJ
Christopher, please leave the bug status as it is now. I was the original reporter *and* member of the Ubuntu Kernel team and I created this bug specifically to track the issue against the mainline kernel. There is no work to be done nor data collection required against Ubuntu, as I have

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 342926] Re: No PCI IOMEM space available below 4GB

2013-09-11 Thread TJ
No point. All work - if any - will be upstream not in Ubuntu and the information required is already available in the initial comment I created for this bug report. ** Tags removed: needs-kernel-logs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 342926] Re: No PCI IOMEM space available below 4GB

2013-09-10 Thread TJ
I did some work upstream but it became too complicated. Others have also tried but nothing has changed. In the meantime the hardware out there that has a 32-bit limit imposed by its southbridge on 64-bit CPUs is all now old legacy gear so I don't foresee the kernel fixing this, ever. It still

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1039916] Re: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer

2012-08-24 Thread TJ
A ray of hope for the alternative. After fixing a bug in the nvidiabl kernel module[1] I can use the standard OS brightness controls to control the backlight. More work needs to be done on that, and it needs to be brought into Ubuntu, but it is the proper solution and it does work for many

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1039916] Re: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer

2012-08-23 Thread TJ
The blacklisted entry was introduced by the latest security patch to the nvidia drivers. nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates (295.49-0ubuntu0.2) precise-security; urgency=low * SECURITY UPDATE: privilege escalation via kernel memory access -

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1039916] Re: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer

2012-08-23 Thread TJ
:292 alignOff = 0 #2 0x00401f43 in unmap_mem () at backend.c:150 No locals. #3 0x004022dd in unset_card () at backend.c:252 No locals. #4 0x0040dd83 in create_config (file=0x61f030 /home/tj/.nvclock/config) at config.c:611 section = hw0 bios

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1039916] Re: Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer

2012-08-23 Thread TJ
Discussion with Adam Conrad on IRC #ubuntu-devel: TJ- A recent change to the nvidia DKMS drivers package has broken another package such that it won't conceivably ever work again. What's the procedure in such cases? infinity TJ-: That might need to be slightly less vague. TJ- infinity: bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 95444] Re: No Screen Backlight Control; Notebooks (Vaio, Macbook, HP/Compaq, Samsung, Zepto et al.) with Nvidia Geforce8/Geforce9/Quadro series graphics

2012-08-22 Thread TJ
The SIGSEGV is being tracked in bug #1039916 Nvidia driver causing SIGSEGV in nvclock and smartdimmer. That bug affects the Fix released status of this bug since this work- around no longer functions. I've nominated this bug for Precise and Quantal, but any fix of the SIGSEGV issue will be done

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1011732] Re: External display blinks off periodically

2012-07-02 Thread TJ
I've got two Samsung P2450 monitors and am seeing something similar. Monitor A was deployed as as the external monitor connected to the Ubuntu laptop docking station using DVI-D. Laptop has Nvidia GeForce Go 7600. Monitor B was the secondary monitor on a Windows XP Gaming PC with Nvidia 9800GT

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1011732] Re: External display blinks off periodically

2012-07-02 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011732 Title: External display blinks off

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2012-04-23 Thread TJ
The original report was on a desktop with an ATI Radeon video adapter running Lucid. I gave up on that system. Now, on a Precise amd64 installation on my primary laptop that has an Nvidia GEForce Go 7600 and the nvidia drivers I've hit the same issue several times today (23 April 2012) after

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2012-04-23 Thread TJ
** Attachment added: Xorg log containing stack backtraces https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/567696/+attachment/3100849/+files/Xorg.0.log.old ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2012-04-22 Thread TJ
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 576648] Re: package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.)

2011-09-26 Thread TJ
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Assignee: TJ (intuitivenipple

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 576648] Re: package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.)

2011-08-27 Thread TJ
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = TJ (intuitivenipple) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = TJ (intuitivenipple) ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = TJ

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 576648] Re: package nvidia-* failed to install/upgrade: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (Unable to determine the target kernel version.)

2011-08-27 Thread TJ
This is caused by a failure to detect the kernel version by the 'conftest.sh' script, which attempts to compile an incomplete kernel module. There are a variety of issues causing the failure. I've current addressed the one that affects builds for 2.6.39 and later (compiler should use

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-18 Thread TJ
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = TJ (intuitivenipple) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-18 Thread TJ
After considering that many different video graphics drivers exhibit this fault, I decided to focus on the kernel's DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) code since it is common to all reports. There has been a lot of change in the DRM code since the Lucid kernel was released with Linux v2.6.32. As a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-18 Thread TJ
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567696 Title: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-18 Thread TJ
I've managed to trigger the fault using kernel v2.6.38 from Natty whilst running the Software Sources update after enabling additional repositories. I noticed in previous debugging sessions that the DRM_DEBUG messages emitted when enabled in the kernel with echo 1 | sudo tee

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-17 Thread TJ
** Summary changed: - [Radeon] [Lucid] [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop + [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567696] Re: [mi] EQ overflowing. The server is probably stuck in an infinite loop

2011-07-17 Thread TJ
** Description changed: - Whilst running an update-manager session for Lucid 10.04 i386 the - update-manager appeared to 'freeze' midway. The rest of the Gnome - interface was similarly unresponsive and the mouse cursor displays the - animated 'busy' circle (but it wasn't being animated). +

  1   2   >