Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-20 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
Hi Ken (and all), Thanks for your time and patience with this. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:10:49 -0700 Ken Whistler via Unicode wrote: > On 7/19/2018 12:38 AM, Shai Berger via Unicode wrote: > > If I cannot trust that > > people I communicate with make the same choices I make, plain

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-19 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 02:55:17 -0700 Asmus Freytag wrote: > On 7/18/2018 1:51 AM, Shai Berger via Unicode wrote: > > The trade-off you seem to prefer is to make the "plain text > > is universally readable" idea from the core Unicode definition, not > > applica

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-18 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:40:50 -0700 Ken Whistler via Unicode wrote: > > So your complaint seems to boil down to the claim that if you > transmit "Hello, world!" to a process which then renders it > conformantly according to the Unicode Standard (including > UBA), then that process must somehow

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-16 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
Hi Eli and all, On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:07:50 +0300 Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote: > From: Shai Berger > > > > I have no argument with this, but I do think that in such cases it > > is wrong for the app to pretend that it is still treating the text > > as plain. > > What is "plain text"

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-16 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 12:14:35 -0700 Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote: > I would say the problem lies in the attempt to exchange arbitrary raw > data and expect perfectly compatible rendering [...] Editors for > plain text will wrap or not wrap lines on presentation [...] The bidi > case is just

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-14 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:22:51 +0300 Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote: > > Different applications will have different needs here, so there's > definitely a need to provide applications and users with some control > of paragraph direction, and the way to do this is define high-level > protocols

Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-10 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
Hello Philippe, On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:37:56 +0200 Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote: > A plain text editor should not have a default strong LTR default, it > should have a weak undetermined direction, I agree -- but the UTC does not, according to the last entry in

UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext

2018-07-09 Thread Shai Berger via Unicode
Hello all, About two and a half years ago, I suggested adding a FAQ about the applicability of higher-level protocols for bidirectional plaintext, as specified by http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/ -- my suggestion was to clarify that higher-level protocols can only be applied upon agreement