[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-06 Thread Artur Rona
** Also affects: josm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542653 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream + Merge josm 0.0.svn2255-1 (universe) with Debian testing (main) ** Tags added: merge --

[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-03 Thread Neil Perry
Source package josm Source package version 0.0.svn2255-1 Where to sync from: Debian Squeeze ** Summary changed: - Sync with upstream version + josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream -- josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491294 You received this bug

[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-03 Thread Iain Lane
Did you test that the Debian version builds, installs, and functions correctly under Lucid? -- josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-03 Thread Neil Perry
josm depends on libgettext-commons-java (= 0.9.6); however: Version of libgettext-commons-java in the Lucid repo is 0.9-1. Builds, installs fines. However, Class-Path: /usr/share/java/gettext-commons.jar /usr/share/java/metadata-extractor.jar Fatal: failed to locate image

[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-03 Thread Fabrice Coutadeur
Hi, Apart from the FTBFS, the package can't be synced from Debian as some specific Ubuntu modifications has not been integrated there nor in upstream. So please merge the ubuntu's changes with the Debian package, and put back the status as new when finish. Thanks, Fabrice ** Changed in: josm

[Bug 491294] Re: josm 0.0.svn2255-1 sync with upstream

2009-12-03 Thread Matt Trudel
Neil, If you need help with the merge, I'd be happy to lend a hand. There is a report in the JOSM tracker (http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3721) that the patch which Fabrice is talking about doesn't quite work with 2255, that should probably be investigated :) / Matt ** Bug watch added: