Well good thing we have a rigorous SRU process, since I'm failing quite
badly at backporting.
v-failed, uploading new versions again.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-failed-mantic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
I overlooked reverting the build dependency on the new
python3-launchpadlib-desktop package, which I knew I needed to do but
then failed to actually handle. Will do a new upload with this fix
soon-ish.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
verification-needed-mantic
**
** Changed in: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Cinnamon Developers, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056591
Title:
[UIFe] Noble Flavor
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057716
Title:
SRU of ubuntu-dev-tools
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
This release sports both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to
make sure all of our Ubuntu developers have access to these improvements.
[Test Case]
The following development and SRU process was followed:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevToolsUpdates
** Also affects: cinnamon-desktop-environment (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cinnamon (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: cinnamon-desktop-environment (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug
focal autopkgtests passed.
$ for cmd in backportpackage bitesize check-mir grep-merges pull-debian-debdiff
requestbackport requestsync seeded-in-ubuntu sponsor-patch submittodebian
syncpackage ubuntu-build ubuntu-iso ubuntu-upload-permission update-maintainer;
do $cmd --help || echo "Failed:
jammy autopkgtests passed.
$ for cmd in backportpackage bitesize check-mir grep-merges pull-debian-debdiff
requestbackport requestsync seeded-in-ubuntu sponsor-patch submittodebian
syncpackage ubuntu-build ubuntu-iso ubuntu-upload-permission update-maintainer;
do $cmd --help || echo "Failed:
kinetic autopkgtests passed.
$ for cmd in backportpackage bitesize check-mir grep-merges pull-debian-debdiff
requestbackport requestsync seeded-in-ubuntu sponsor-patch submittodebian
syncpackage ubuntu-build ubuntu-iso ubuntu-upload-permission update-maintainer;
do $cmd --help || echo "Failed:
autopkgtests passed for lunar and no additional verification needed for
that release.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-lunar
** Tags added: verification-done-lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release sports both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to make
sure all of our Ubuntu developers have access to these improvements.
[Test Case]
The following development and SRU process was followed:
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release sports both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to make
sure all of our Ubuntu developers have access to these improvements.
[Test Case]
The following development and SRU process was followed:
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This release sports both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to make
sure all of our Ubuntu developers have access to these improvements.
[Test Case]
The following development and SRU process was followed:
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
This release sports both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to make
sure all of our Ubuntu developers have access to these improvements.
[Test Case]
The following development and SRU process was followed:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevToolsUpdates
I do not see what this change was supposed to solve. I disagree with
the *existing* version check in germinate, and do not want to see more
of these - it imposes needless barriers for updating the metapackages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Cinnamon
'TEMP_PREFERENCES': No such file or directory
-
It appears there is a typo around line 907, see attached patch
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** C
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Kevin bush (akjk32002) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-dev-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-
tools/0.175~18.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Scott, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-dev-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-
tools/0.175~18.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Tags added: fr-932
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864571
Title:
SRU ubuntu-dev-tools
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864571
Title:
SRU ubuntu-dev-tools
To manage
This package has passed its autopkgtests, which was determined to be
sufficient for SRU. Marking verification-done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-done-bionic
** Tags added:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:56:24PM -, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> This is the kind of things backports should be used for.
Backports are not used by default, and the backports archive is for when you
want to give users the choice of the old vs the new behavior.
My argument is that for a
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:08:38PM -, Dan Streetman wrote:
> ubuntu-dev-tools in focal have py2 support removed, but bionic still
> supports py2. Are you suggesting adding py2 support back in for the
> bionic backport?
I wasn't suggesting it, because I hadn't realized there were bits exposed
Public bug reported:
[SRU justification]
The ubuntu-dev-tools package is primarily of interest to Ubuntu developers,
providing tools for interacting with the Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu
developer-centric services. Developers should have consistent behavior from
these tools, regardless of which
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Justification]
+ The mk-sbuild command fails to completely set up its schroot environment if
/etc/localtime is a symlink, due to wrong 'cp' options. Since /etc/localtime
is a symlink /by default/, this makes the tool unusable for most users in
xenial.
+
+ [Test
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569400
Title:
mk-sbuild fails with cp:
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)
--
You received
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569400
Title:
mk-sbuild fails with cp:
Public bug reported:
Whenever I run submittodebian, I wind up having to manually edit my
debdiff to filter out the change from update-maintainer. I'm very
paranoid about this, because I don't want Debian maintainers to ever get
the impression that I'm proposing that Ubuntu take over maintenance
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902233
Title:
submittodebian should intelligently filter
Public bug reported:
My editor leaves backup files behind using the ~ convention. This makes
submittodebian unhappy; after successfully sending the bug report to
Debian, it then tries to clean up the tmpdir and fails:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/submittodebian, line 195,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899399
Title:
submittodebian crashes after successful filing due to editor backup
files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted into natty-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
--
You
Fix confirmed here. Thanks
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880051
Title:
syncpackage crashed with AttributeError in copy(): 'NoneType'
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880051
Title:
syncpackage crashed with AttributeError in copy(): 'NoneType' object
has no attribute
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
Recent versions of update-maintainer seem to use some sort of parser for
debian/control instead of doing a simple substitution into the file.
This is a problem because the parser is buggy - in particular it seems
to fail on stanzas
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756373
Title:
update-maintainer mangles debian/control at the
Well, opensc 0.11.12 has been uploaded to lucid in the meantime by
another dev, bypassing this bug report... so the core issue here is now
fixed in lucid. Marking as such.
Dominik, what exactly was outdated about the copyright? When I looked
at the package in the PPA I found a debian/copyright
Getting binaries for lucid...
[Updating] alien-arena (7.0-1build1 [Ubuntu] 7.33-2 [Debian])
* Trying to add alien-arena...
- alien-arena_7.33.orig.tar.gz: downloading from
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- alien-arena_7.33-2.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
-
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bzr-builddeb
When building packages with bzr bd, the resulting .debs are output in
the parent directory with permissions that don't match my shell's umask.
This is inconvenient when my build directory happens to be on an NFS
share, because I have to
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39334004/Dependencies.txt
--
bzr-builddeb doesn't respect umask when outputting .debs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Ok, the error message means exactly what it says - the maintainer script
that is calling ucf is calling it incorrectly. Reassigning this to the
bandwidthd package.
** Package changed: ucf (Ubuntu) = bandwidthd (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: bandwidthd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
--
sparc
2010-02-04 19:26:48 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2010-02-04 19:26:48 INFOComment: Not ported to python 2.6; LP: #516932
2010-02-04 19:26:48 INFO7 packages successfully removed.
2010-02-04 19:26:48 INFOTransaction committed.
2010-02-04 19:26:48 INFOThe archive will be updated
2010-02-04 19:30:01 INFOcreating lockfile
2010-02-04 19:30:06 INFORemoving candidates:
2010-02-04 19:30:06 INFOsagemath 3.0.5dfsg-4ubuntu2 in lucid
2010-02-04 19:30:06 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2010-02-04 19:30:06 INFOComment: Removed from Debian testing, depends
2010-02-04 20:03:17 INFOcreating lockfile
2010-02-04 20:03:27 INFORemoving candidates:
2010-02-04 20:03:27 INFOvegastrike 0.5~svn12126-2build1 in lucid
2010-02-04 20:03:27 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2010-02-04 20:03:27 INFOComment: Removed from Debian testing, depends
2010-02-04 20:15:54 INFOcreating lockfile
2010-02-04 20:15:59 INFORemoving candidates:
2010-02-04 20:15:59 INFOplplot 5.9.2-3build1 in lucid
2010-02-04 20:15:59 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2010-02-04 20:15:59 INFOComment: Removed from Debian testing, depends
Public bug reported:
The lxdm PAM config references both /etc/pam.d/common-*, and individual
modules provided by libpam-modules. It therefore must have a dependency
on both libpam-runtime (= 0.76-14) and libpam-modules.
See /usr/share/doc/libpam0g/Debian-PAM-MiniPolicy.gz for details.
**
** Also affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Medium
Status: Triaged
--
ia32-libs should be updated with the libraries from Mesa 7.7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Alberto Milone (albertomilone)
Status: Triaged
--
ia32-libs should install libGL.so* in /usr/lib32/mesa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506435
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: wine1.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511101
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: wine1.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511014
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: wine1.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
uninstallable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
8.04.3 was already released when the bug was filed; moving this
milestone to 8.04.4.
Has anyone tested that this package works in hardy and dapper?
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu Hardy)
Milestone: ubuntu-8.04.3 = ubuntu-8.04.4
--
update to 1.5.0-22
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484288
Is this problem reproducible? The ISO build report showed zero
uninstallable packages on this CD, and a test 'apt-get install xubuntu-
desktop^' in a chroot works fine.
Also, one of the packages listed as uninstallable here is libreadline5,
which is *very* unlikely to be caused by an archive
You were using version 0.6-1ubuntu4 of zsync from karmic-updates?
--
zsync 32bit cannot download DVD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403286 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403286
No, this bug is correctly marked as a duplicate; it describes the exact
same problem. If you are seeing this failure on update, then you're not
updating to the final version of mini-httpd included in the
[Updating] getfem++ (4.0.0-2 [Ubuntu] 4.0.0-3 [Debian])
* Trying to add getfem++...
- getfem++_4.0.0-3.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- getfem++_4.0.0.orig.tar.gz: already in distro - downloading from librarian
- getfem++_4.0.0-3.diff.gz: downloading from
The problem described in this bug report was fixed prior to the Ubuntu
9.10 release. Please open a new bug report and describe clearly in your
own words what problem you're having with this package.
** Changed in: mini-httpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
mini-httpd sysv
-picked a couple of your changes from your ppa, hopefully
this is everything that's needed to get this up-to-date.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
Since the fix is being backported for karmic, the concern will be
whether we can assume that your test results with 0.11.12 apply to this
backported version. Even if you're confident that the change stands
alone, there's always the possibility that I've screwed up the backport.
:) So from the
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) = Steve
Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) = Steve
Langasek (vorlon)
--
PKCS#11 signing does not work
Since this is entirely a community-supported package in Ubuntu and we
don't have the hardware resources to regression-test a new upstream
version for karmic, I'm afraid this will be a backport of the one fix in
the case of karmic.
For lucid, I think it's reasonable to pull the new upstream
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: opensc
Hello,
we are using OpenSC to authenticate our users and allow access to our
Intranet. On Jaunty this worked fine
but under Karmic it is e.g. not possible to sign data using our smartcards.
Here the output of my testscript under
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: opensc (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
PKCS#11 signing does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
convertall 0.4.3 is not in Ubuntu, so this is not fixed.
** Changed in: convertall (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
No conversion occurs. It just says converting... but nothing happens!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474341
You received this bug notification because you are a
[Updating] autotrace (0.31.1-14ubuntu2 [Ubuntu] 0.31.1-15 [Debian])
* Trying to add autotrace...
- autotrace_0.31.1-15.diff.gz: downloading from
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- autotrace_0.31.1.orig.tar.gz: already in distro - downloading from
librarian
- autotrace_0.31.1-15.dsc:
Correct, lucid will only support python2.6 - that means that the Debian
package, which calls python2.5 explicitly, *must* be patched to be
buildable and usable in lucid.
So I'm marking this bug as invalid, since the package must not be synced
in its current form. Feel free to reopen the bug and
** Changed in: grub-choose-default (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: grub-choose-default (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
Installs old grub on grub2 karmic systems, breaks update-grub
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476822
You received this bug notification because
2009-12-22 02:05:50 INFOOverride Component to: 'main'
2009-12-22 02:05:50 INFO'plymouth - 0.8.0~-5/universe/x11' source overridden
2009-12-22 02:05:50 INFO
'libplymouth-dev-0.8.0~-5/universe/libdevel/OPTIONAL' binary overridden in
lucid/amd64
2009-12-22 02:05:50 INFO
rapache 0.7-0ubuntu6 in lucid sparc
2009-12-22 03:09:37 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2009-12-22 03:09:37 INFOComment: (From Debian) ROM; abandoned upstream, low
popcon; Debian bug #558123
2009-12-22 03:09:37 INFO8 packages successfully removed.
Confirm this transaction? [yes, no] yes
in lucid
2009-12-22 03:46:26 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2009-12-22 03:46:26 INFOComment: integrated in python 2.6, so obsolete; LP:
#418280
2009-12-22 03:46:26 INFO1 package successfully removed.
Confirm this transaction? [yes, no] yes
2009-12-22 03:46:29 INFOTransaction committed
Getting binaries for lucid...
[Updating] schroot (1.2.3-1 [Ubuntu] 1.3.1-1 [Debian])
* Trying to add schroot...
- schroot_1.3.1-1.diff.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- schroot_1.3.1-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- schroot_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz:
2009-12-22 03:51:30 INFORemoving candidates:
2009-12-22 03:51:30 INFOstanford-pwdhash 1.7-0ubuntu1 in lucid
2009-12-22 03:51:30 INFORemoved-by: Steve Langasek
2009-12-22 03:51:30 INFOComment: replaced by pwdhash; LP: #480805
2009-12-22 03:51:30 INFO1 package successfully
libsfml was not being synced because it had been blacklisted due to an
orig.tar.gz mismatch. Now that there's a new upstream version in
Debian, this is no longer an issue, so I've unblacklisted and synced the
package.
** Changed in: libsfml (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
[Updating] emesene (1.5-1ubuntu1 [Ubuntu] 1.5.1-1 [Debian])
* Trying to add emesene...
- emesene_1.5.1-1.diff.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- emesene_1.5.1-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- emesene_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz: downloading from
** Also affects: libssh (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac)
Status: New
--
MIR for libssh
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492931
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Accepted into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Also affects: gpsdrive (Ubuntu Karmic)
Accepted into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Changed in: openmpi (Ubuntu Karmic)
Please see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost/+bug/42362/comments/3.
This is not a mode that is expected to work with the static libraries
shipped in Ubuntu.
The problem only manifests on 64-bit because 32-bit and 64-bit systems
have different rules on the use of PIC code.
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
When using plymouth ask-for-password to prompt for a luks passphrase, I
have to type slowly and verify each keypress is registered on the screen
before continuing, because around 30% of my keypresses are not
registered at all by plymouth.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36833143/Dependencies.txt
--
plymouth ask-for-password doesn't register all of my keypresses when typing
passphrase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497115
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
It's not consistent across attempts. On a crypted disk set up for
testing with a passphrase of 'meep', on one occasion I had to type
'mmeeeppenterenter' to get the passphrase fully entered. On another
occasion, 'meeepenter' was sufficient. The backspace key is also
affected.
On another disk
After a few more reboots, my impression is that this is a timing thing:
if I type more slowly, plymouth's success rate increases. It looks like
maybe plymouth ignores any keypresses that happen while it's still
processing the preceding one?
--
plymouth ask-for-password doesn't register all of
This package fails to sync with the following error:
2009-12-14 22:02:39 DEBUG You are receiving this email because you are the
uploader, maintainer or
2009-12-14 22:02:39 DEBUG signer of the above package.
2009-12-14 22:02:39 WARNING Upload was rejected:
2009-12-14 22:02:39 WARNING
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
Updating cryptsetup to integrate with plymouth, I find that I'm
presented at boot with a padlock and an entry field, but no text
explaining what I'm unlocking. This information has been passed as
'plymouth ask-for-password --prompt=my prompt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36795261/Dependencies.txt
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: High
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
On a recent reboot, one of my filesystems had to fscked. There was no
indication on the plymouth boot splash that this fsck was in progress.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Dec 14 15:41:08 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36795483/Dependencies.txt
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
plymouth's boot screen currently includes no animation, making it
impossible to distinguish between a slow boot (for whatever reason) and
a hung system. It's important to have some feedback, at least after an
initial timeout.
ProblemType: Bug
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36795608/Dependencies.txt
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Medium
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
To check on what was taking my system a long time to boot, I tried to
switch VT's with Alt+arrow keys. This caused the console boot messages
to appear briefly, only to be replaced immediately by the plymouth boot
splash again. So something
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36795997/Dependencies.txt
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
switching VT away from plymouth does not reliably show the boot
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
When typing a passphrase into the prompt presented by plymouth ask-for-
password, if the starred-out letters exceed the width of the text box,
they will continue to be drawn off the edge of the box. Plymouth should
do as, e.g., gdm and
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36796381/Dependencies.txt
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
plymouth password dialog lets you type off the end of the box
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: plymouth
When shutting down from X, the splash screen is corrupted; only part of
the Ubuntu logo is displayed, and it's rendered on top of a screen full
of boot-time console messages. When shutting down from the console, I
don't appear to have this
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36796486/Dependencies.txt
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: High
There is also no change in the boot splash when calling 'plymouth
message --text=string', so e.g., there is no feedback on a failed
passphrase. I'm speculating that these two issues have the same root
cause.
--
plymouth ask-for-password doesn't display --prompt argument
[Updating] mythtvfs-fuse (0.6.0-1 [Ubuntu] 0.6.1-1 [Debian])
* Trying to add mythtvfs-fuse...
- mythtvfs-fuse_0.6.1-1.diff.gz: downloading from
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- mythtvfs-fuse_0.6.1-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/
- mythtvfs-fuse_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz:
1 - 100 of 1166 matches
Mail list logo
