this class and tried to override its abstract
method. But I am not able to get where and what to write to
change column family?
So please provide your suggestions.
Thanks
Shweta
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 08:33 PM, Adam Fuchs wrote
Thanks for all the suggestion.
I read about TransformingIterator and started implementing it, I
extended this class and tried to override its abstract method. But I am
not able to get where and what to write to change column family?
So please provide your suggestions.
Thanks
Shweta
. But I am not
able to get where and what to write to change column family?
So please provide your suggestions.
Thanks
Shweta
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 08:33 PM, Adam Fuchs wrote:
This can also be done with a row-doesn't-fit-into-memory constraint. You
won't need to hold the second column
.
I read about TransformingIterator and started implementing
it, I extended this class and tried to override its abstract
method. But I am not able to get where and what to write to
change column family?
So please provide your suggestions.
Thanks
and tried to override its abstract
method. But I am not able to get where and what to write to
change column family?
So please provide your suggestions.
Thanks
Shweta
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 08:33 PM, Adam Fuchs wrote:
This can also be done
Also, checkout
https://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/apidocs/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/user/TransformingIterator.html
for helping you with this task
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Short answer: no.
Long answer: maybe.
You can write an iterator
This can also be done with a row-doesn't-fit-into-memory constraint. You
won't need to hold the second column in-memory if your iterator tree deep
copies, filters, transforms and merges. Exhibit A:
[HeapIterator-derivative]
|_
| \
