I thought the main gain was to get ACID on Hive performant enough.
@Mich: Do you run with ACID-enabled tables? How many Create/Update/Deletes
do you do per second?
best regards
/Pelle
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Jörn Franke wrote:
> I think the main gain is more
I think the main gain is more about getting rid of a dedicated database
including maintenance and potential license cost.
For really large clusters and a lot of users this might be even more
beneficial. You can avoid clustering the database etc.
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 00:46, Mich Talebzadeh
A while back there was some notes on having Hive metastore on Hbase as
opposed to conventional RDBMSs
I am currently involved with some hefty work with Hbase and Phoenix for
batch ingestion of trade data. As long as you define your Hbase table
through Phoenix and with secondary Phoenix indexes on
ok. i'll bite.
lets see the output of this command where Hiveserver2 is running.
$ ps -ef | grep -i hiveserver2
this'll show us all the command line parameters HS2 was (ultimately)
invoked with.
Cheers,
Stephen
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 6:46 AM, patcharee
wrote:
>
Hi,
I use beeline to connect to hiveserver2. I tested with a simple command
and got an error GC overhead limit exceeded
0: jdbc:hive2://service-10-1:10010/default> drop table testhivedrivertable;
Error: Error while processing statement: FAILED: Execution Error, return
code 1 from