Hi Dmitry,
It depends if the upsert turns into an insert or an update, and it will
share the same characteristics as what it turns into. So if all your
upserts turn into inserts, because none of the rows already exist, then
it's just like if you had done a pure insert workload.
Hope this helps,
d a way to reuse client instance in NiFi while
> still keeping native concurrency benefits of NiFi and our performance
> improved by 10 times at least!
>
> Thanks for your help and ideas! It is quite a relief for us!
> Boris
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:51 AM Jean-Daniel Cr
Some comments on the original problem: "we need to process 1000s of
operations per second and noticed that our Kudu 1.5 cluster was only using
10 threads while our application spins up 50 clients/threads"
I wouldn't directly infer that 20 threads won't be enough to match your
needs. The time it
Hi Vladimir,
As you saw there's no way to do this, although it shouldn't be too hard to
add. I definitely see value in it.
Are you facing timeouts writing or reading? Maybe there's something that
can be optimized in your use case so that you don't even run a chance of
getting timeouts.
Thanks,
;bo...@boristyukin.com> wrote:
> it is possible but I thought Kudu keeps its stuff in its own folders
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Boris,
>>
>> Thanks for reporting back with results!
>>
&
r help, J-D
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm more thinking in terms of the startup IO having some impact on the
>> co-located services, but we really need to know what "went down" means.
>>
One (or three) of us! One of us!
Congrats to all,
J-D
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi Kudu community,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that the Kudu PMC has voted to add Andrew Wong,
> Grant Henke, and Hao Hao as Kudu committers and PMC members. This
>
ither one. I'll get with
> him on Monday to gather more details
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> How exactly did HDFS and ZK go down? A Kudu restart is fairly
>> IO-intensive but
often than
>> that! :))
>>
>> I will report back with our results. So far I am really impressed with
>> Kudu - we have been benchmarking ingest and egress throughput and our
>> typical queries runtime. The biggest pain so far is lack of support for
>> decimals
>
evious query and this time I do not see
> any difference in query time before the first and second time - I guess
> this confirms your statement about " first time ever scanning the table
> since a Kudu restart" and collecting metadata.
>
Maybe, I've been known to be right once or tw
Hi Boris,
Given that we don't have much data we can use here, I'll have to
extrapolate. As an aside though, this is yet another example where we need
more Kudu-side metrics in the query profile.
So, Kudu lazily loads a bunch of metadata and that can really affect scan
times. If this was your
Hi Lee,
There were a lot of improvements recently to copy time, if you have to run
against master then things should speed up on your next refresh. But, TBH,
it still won't be perfect as this isn't done in a streaming fashion. The
source tablet servers sends one block, the destination writes it,
Hi Denis,
I don't directly manage Kudu clusters but what I've seen ranges anywhere
from 0 bytes to 100GB. I wouldn't recommend going much higher than this
because re-replicating 100GB takes a _long_ time, although it should be a
little better in upcoming 1.5.0 thanks to Hao's work.
Sweet spot is
(putting dev@ in bcc again, please be mindful of which mailing list you
write to)
The best way would be to follow the "Batch insert" method described here:
http://kudu.apache.org/docs/kudu_impala_integration.html#kudu_impala_insert_bulk
J-D
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:30 PM, sky
or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. All unintended
> recipients are obliged to delete this message and destroy any pr
es-in-multiple-formats
>
>
>
> 2017-06-16 17:43 GMT+03:00 Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> Cloudera stopped releasing binaries in lockstep with Apache Kudu
>> releases. Right now the Kudu project doesn't publish binaries, on
Hi,
You can find the documentation here:
http://kudu.apache.org/docs/security.html
It could use more information for the client side of things, but basically
there's nothing you need to do (apart from being kinit'd) to get
authentication and wire encryption working. I'd also recommend reading
Hi Juan,
The documentation is a bit late coming, here's a draft:
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/6479/
Cheers,
J-D
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:14 AM, Juan Pablo Briganti <
juan.briga...@globant.com> wrote:
> Hi Kudu Team,
>
> First of all thank you for providing kerberos security feature in Kudu
Hi Alexandre,
Tablet replicas are not tied to a UUID, so removing or reusing one wouldn't
achieve what you want. The main thing missing here is that Kudu doesn't do
tablet re-balancing at runtime, so tabletserver5 will get tablets the next
time a node dies or if you create new tables.
Obviously
It might be supported at some point but I don't know of any timeline.
J-D
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Ladislav Gabčo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have managed to deploy KUDU to cluster (on debian jessie), but was
> unable to install Impala-KUDU (using CM).
>
> I have
Hi Trey,
Kudu currently requires removing all the Kudu data folders on a machine
when one disk fails. This is because Kudu effectively does striping over
all the data disks. Assuming you're not running with replication=1, your
data should already be re-replicated on your other nodes.
Hope this
Hi,
There's been some reports (https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3991) that
the latest Impala Kudu is slower yes, try the one that was released before
that?
Regarding your log, I'd investigate what's going on in 192.168.110.9's
tserver WARNING log around the time of that query.
J-D
On
(with my vendor hat on)
>From a Cloudera perspective, support for Kudu is still in beta. We offer
the bits with no guarantees. If you have more questions regarding parcels,
CM, etc, please direct them to
http://community.cloudera.com/t5/Beta-Releases-Apache-Kudu/bd-p/Beta
Thanks!
J-D
On Wed,
Hi Amit,
There's this jira on the Impala side:
https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3726
I don't know exactly when it'll be available, but I think it's being looked
at.
Dan Burkert also has a Rust shell for Kudu somewhere, I'll let him comment
about it.
J-D
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 5:36
24 matches
Mail list logo