What is wrong with porky the pig as the logo?
:)
That's all folks!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Eric Lubow eric.lu...@gmail.com wrote:
Coming from a user's perspective, I would have the following to say:
Anyone who is using Hadoop has an obvious understanding that 1.0
IMO 1.0 for a product typically promises :
1) Reasonable stability of interfaces.
Typically only major version changes break interface compatibility.
While we are at 0.x, it seems to be considered 'okish' to violate this :
but once you are at 1.0 and higher, breaking interface contracts will
Coming from a user's perspective, I would have the following to say:
Anyone who is using Hadoop has an obvious understanding that 1.0 doesn't
really mean much if it's in use (which Pig obviously is). What 1.0 has the
potential to do for someone like me is that I may be able to go to Amazon
and
.
By this definition, 0.7.0 was probably 1.0.0 (given that UDFs were
forced to make code changes).
-sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Alan Gates [mailto:ga...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: 04 March 2011 00:14
To: user@pig.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Pig.next
I agree that there will probably need
Nair
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:35 PM
To: user@pig.apache.org; Santhosh Srinivasan
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Pig.next
The interfaces that pig have are at different levels of maturity, and most of
the interfaces have been marked as stable or evolving to indicate that.
Most of the core
Pig Users and Developers,
We are starting to plan the work after Pig 0.9. One thing we need to decide is
what name/number to give to the next release: Pig 0.10 or Pig 1.0.
I believe that we are ready to declare 1.0. Here are my reasons:
(1) We are mature enough and produce good quality
APIs. We should probably aim for 1.0 around the
same time.
Santhosh
-Original Message-
From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:31 PM
To: user@pig.apache.org
Cc: Olga Natkovich
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Pig.next
I am worried that the new
I am not in agreement with that :)
From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:57 PM
To: user@pig.apache.org
Cc: Santhosh Srinivasan; Olga Natkovich
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Pig.next
by way of crazy ideas -- I kind of feel
I tend to interpret Hadoop 0.21 and Pig 0.9 as Hadoop has had 21 releases and
Pig has had 9 releases respectively.
In keeping with that, Pig version numbers that trail Hadoop seem logically
consistent because Pig, in practice, primarily works off Hadoop (though it can
do local mode, drive non
