Hi Simon,
You should never confuse Java byte code with compiled byte code. I
understand there are a few superfluous byte codes, but in the end the
JVM determines how to compile it to CPU instructions. Unfortunately I am
not aware of what the JVM actually does with unused values. Does it do
escape
Christopher,
As I wrote already on Feb 17:
There is another aproach, as taken by http://code.google.com/p/log5j/.
It is
a wrapper around log4j. I wish they had made it for SLF4J!
I am still waiting for someone to this for SLF4J. It should not be hard. I did
not yet find the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ceki,
I do understand your reasoning, and thank you for your quick response.
And since Logback natively implements SLF4J, its API will also not be
changed to include any new JSE 5 features, correct? Nor will new method
signatures specific to just Logback be
Sr. Programmer
1-617-772-2403
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/24/2008 09:50 AM
Please respond to
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
To
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
cc
Subject
Re: [slf4j-user] Java 5 version
list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
cc
Subject
Re: [slf4j-user] Java 5 version of SLF4J?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ceki,
I do understand your reasoning, and thank you for your quick response.
And since Logback natively implements SLF4J, its API will also not be
changed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did know that I can parameterize up to 2 parameters, which is nice. But
I also think that it is annoying to have to remember to change the syntax
once you hit 3+ parameters. Along with this, it is also annoying to have
to remember to change syntax when logging
,
Christopher White
Sr. Programmer
1-617-772-2403
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joern Huxhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/24/2008 10:24 AM
Please respond to
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
To
User list for the slf4j project user@slf4j.org
cc
Subject
Re: [slf4j-user] Java 5
Hi Joern,
Christopher White's sums the warts in the SLF4J API pretty well:
I did know that I can parameterize up to 2 parameters, which is
nice. But I also think that it is annoying to have to remember to
change the syntax once you hit 3+ parameters. Along with this, it is
also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice to see that you were on top of this already.
My only issue with your fix is that it can be ambiguous as to which comes
first (params or exception). I'd much prefer putting the exception at the
front of the method signature (as was suggested by another
Has there been any more discussion lately about updating the API to
support varargs and perhaps printf?
*** IMPORTANT
NOTE* The opinions expressed in this
message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
necessarily those of
10 matches
Mail list logo
